Do you not remember the plot of How the Grinch Stole Christmas? They just gave him a shot of AZ and that sorted Whoville's problems right out.
Anyway, one of my housemates got his second jab today, he was just telling me about when my (vocally) anti-vax housemate appeared behind him and started up with "but it is not 100% effective..." Luckily my just-vaccinated housemate likes getting into big shouty arguments much more than I do, so I was able to pretty much leave them to it. There was one proper weird moment, after my other housemate had gone off to his room, when anti-vax housemate asked me "and you, you are still not planning to get it?" and seemed quite shocked to learn that I'd already had both shots, since he'd somehow managed to convince himself I shared his views on the subject.
There's definitely more dedicated conspiracy beliefs at the heart of it - he's previously expressed the belief that the US elections were rigged but the Belarusian ones were fair, and at one point he seemed to be approaching the position that AZ/Pfizer were bad but Sputnik might be alright, which is the purest expression of "this is your brain on RT" that I can imagine. But today he was mostly arguing more reasonable-sounding stuff about there not being enough information on long-term effects and how it should be an individual choice rather than mandatory.What's your housemate's justification hitmouse - some hippie thing, a more dedicated anti-vax conspiracy thing, or something else?
There's definitely more dedicated conspiracy beliefs at the heart of it - he's previously expressed the belief that the US elections were rigged but the Belarusian ones were fair, and at one point he seemed to be approaching the position that AZ/Pfizer were bad but Sputnik might be alright, which is the purest expression of "this is your brain on RT" that I can imagine. But today he was mostly arguing more reasonable-sounding stuff about there not being enough information on long-term effects and how it should be an individual choice rather than mandatory.
I mean, that was a while back, he does now have switched to just being against the vaccines which is... I suppose a bit more consistent? On the other hand, the other housemate I was talking to seems to have gone from being vaccine-skeptical but agreeing to get because "the fuckers" won't let him travel without it, to now actually being pro-vaccine, so that's progress I suppose.Sounds like some leftie anti-imperialist conspiracy mishmash. Arguing the AZ/Pfizer aren't OK, but Sputnik is, is definitely a novel position...
Sounds like a handy way to save face...I mean, that was a while back, he does now have switched to just being against the vaccines which is... I suppose a bit more consistent? On the other hand, the other housemate I was talking to seems to have gone from being vaccine-skeptical but agreeing to get because "the fuckers" won't let him travel without it, to now actually being pro-vaccine, so that's progress I suppose.
Sounds like a handy way to save face...
In fairness, I think he has genuinely come round - in discussions with the anti-vax housemate, I tend to go for the much more neutral "no, I cannot guarantee that there's no long-term effects and I can't 100% guarantee that people who've been vaccinated won't catch Covid, but I think the odds are much better doing it this way than just going through life hoping I never get it" approach, whereas my other housemate is now much more willing to get into a more animated "so, you think every single government on earth is secretly working together on this, how exactly does that work eh?" approach.Sounds like a handy way to save face...
Duh, it's where the Illuminati have their secret HQ everyone knows that, the temple is built around the crash site of the Lizard People's spaceshipIn fairness, I think he has genuinely come round - in discussions with the anti-vax housemate, I tend to go for the much more neutral "no, I cannot guarantee that there's no long-term effects and I can't 100% guarantee that people who've been vaccinated won't catch Covid, but I think the odds are much better doing it this way than just going through life hoping I never get it" approach, whereas my other housemate is now much more willing to get into a more animated "so, you think every single government on earth is secretly working together on this, how exactly does that work eh?" approach.
On a possibly-related note, a few months back my house had a very interesting debate about the existence of the sunken city of Atlantis - I bet you can't guess which of my housemates was convinced that it exists as a real physical place.
The ones I’ve encountered are convinced they’re the real resistance, the only thing standing in the way of a total police state. Very brave, much rebellion, so subversive.I wonder if some of the hardcore "rebel" anti lockdown lot realise they are playing right into the governement (political part of it) exact desires:
re open as fast as possible
my late evening drunk cod psychology job done
Ended up engaging with one of the conspiracy / anti-vaxx people over the weekend. Asking for some links to articles that support their views. They sent a video, some pathologist spouting nonsense being interviewed by Anna Brees. 53 minutes of debunkable waffle. They sent another video of a clip from some US government committee with a guy claiming asymptomatic transmission wasn't possible, referring to a couple of studies. I found the studies and sent the links plus explained why they don't say what the guy on the video claimed they did. Was then sent a bmj study that directly contradicted the no asymptomatic transmission idea. Again explained what the study was saying, that asymptomatic transmission was less of a driver of transmission than first thought. Then they switched to the do your own research thing, which they all seem to do after sending a couple of meaningless context free, source free videos.
Delusion level 10 reply from them.
" considering I've posted quite a few things to back up what I've been saying, it's not within my interest to keep doing so, quite frankly, I would much rather keep on with my study & research, than in here.
I'm sure you are quite capable - though use a search engine such as Duckduckgo, which isn't censored or tracked to get a truer picture of your searches
Have you heard of Dr Mike Yeadon? - perhaps start there
so many people are on their own level of awakening- some have more time than others to research- & others don't ( have time) or research at all & perhaps rely on the mainstream media to tell them.
There is so so much going on both at surface level & also bubbling beneath the surface -
Most of what you see on the top surface is pure theatre- but those who dare to question & scratch beneath the surface, soon find that there is such deepness & evil darkness- it's almost unfathomable! & the mega fabricated web of lies that cover it, plus the mass hypnosis & psychological warfare to add - it's no wonder that some of the people are bowing under pressure!
But there are many others of us that can smell & see the BS - Loud & clear- some see a wall where we see a window!
Join up to telegram if you haven't already - you'll get a truer uncensored picture of what is going on"
I wonder if some of the hardcore "rebel" anti lockdown lot realise they are playing right into the governement (political part of it) exact desires:
re open as fast as possible
my late evening drunk cod psychology job done
Ended up engaging with one of the conspiracy / anti-vaxx people over the weekend. Asking for some links to articles that support their views. They sent a video, some pathologist spouting nonsense being interviewed by Anna Brees. 53 minutes of debunkable waffle. They sent another video of a clip from some US government committee with a guy claiming asymptomatic transmission wasn't possible, referring to a couple of studies. I found the studies and sent the links plus explained why they don't say what the guy on the video claimed they did. Was then sent a bmj study that directly contradicted the no asymptomatic transmission idea. Again explained what the study was saying, that asymptomatic transmission was less of a driver of transmission than first thought. Then they switched to the do your own research thing, which they all seem to do after sending a couple of meaningless context free, source free videos.
Delusion level 10 reply from them.
" considering I've posted quite a few things to back up what I've been saying, it's not within my interest to keep doing so, quite frankly, I would much rather keep on with my study & research, than in here.
I'm sure you are quite capable - though use a search engine such as Duckduckgo, which isn't censored or tracked to get a truer picture of your searches
Have you heard of Dr Mike Yeadon? - perhaps start there
so many people are on their own level of awakening- some have more time than others to research- & others don't ( have time) or research at all & perhaps rely on the mainstream media to tell them.
There is so so much going on both at surface level & also bubbling beneath the surface -
Most of what you see on the top surface is pure theatre- but those who dare to question & scratch beneath the surface, soon find that there is such deepness & evil darkness- it's almost unfathomable! & the mega fabricated web of lies that cover it, plus the mass hypnosis & psychological warfare to add - it's no wonder that some of the people are bowing under pressure!
But there are many others of us that can smell & see the BS - Loud & clear- some see a wall where we see a window!
Join up to telegram if you haven't already - you'll get a truer uncensored picture of what is going on"
Love that they think duckduckgo will save them. No mention of VPN or anything else to hide what you're looking at. Still it's probably best they stay away from adverts. Perhaps we should just direct them all to the dark web.
Could you elaborate on this a bit? I'm not sure what you're getting at.
I think the former was to massage the figures down a bit (cynical) or (more realistic) at least give a consistent measure since people have been dying of the effects almost a year later in some cases, and recording such deaths ‘now’ might be misleading as the event causing death occurred a long time previously. They are separately recording where Covid is mentioned as a cause/contribution to death on death certificate so those numbers still exist.Apologies if this point has been dealt with but what is the justification for all deaths within 28 days of a COVID Diagnosis being counted as a COVID-related death but not all adverse health events within a short space of a COVID Vaccination being counted as a Vaccine-related reaction/death?
They are separately recording where Covid is mentioned as a cause/contribution to death on death certificate so those numbers still exist.
Apologies if this point has been dealt with but what is the justification for all deaths within 28 days of a COVID Diagnosis being counted as a COVID-related death but not all adverse health events within a short space of a COVID Vaccination being counted as a Vaccine-related reaction/death?
Struggling to make sense of what you're after, especially the second bit. Do you mean any health events, or ones related (or possibly related) to the vaccine?
For the first bit have a read of these...
Behind the headlines: Counting COVID-19 deaths – UK Health Security Agency
The official blog of the UK Health Security Agency, providing expert insight on the organisation's work and all aspects of health securitypublichealthmatters.blog.gov.uk
New UK-wide methodology agreed to record COVID-19 deaths
The publication of daily data on coronavirus deaths will resume from today, following a review by Public Health England (PHE) of the methodology used to calculate the figures.www.gov.uk