ManchesterBeth
Well-Known Member
goodnight, been nice chatting.
Wow. this thread is a hot take machine.
Huh no it doesn't.Not that many men have responded to the question. I did and I gave an honest response. ‘Admitted’ makes it sound as if we’re deliberately lying. I may be naive but I’m not a liar.
I know men with these attitudes! I haven’t seen the two I’m thinking of for quite a while but I know em, peripheral friend group from time ago. One’s ended up with a sequence of live-in Thai girlfriends, who do all the domestic work for him and always dress nicely and he pays them, i remember the conversation in which he explained that he’s had enough of trying to navigate the waters of having to try to treat women as equals and prefers to pay money to be absolved of that baffling challenge.Exactly...so few men on this thread have admitted to having mates with dodgy attitudes. And yet these men are everywhere...they gotta be someone's mate.
Unacceptable. Leave now.Says a cis man. You're the biggest hypocrite in the world, wouldn't be surprised if a woman comes out in the future alleging all kinds of things.
This isn't on at all.Says a cis man. You're the biggest hypocrite in the world, wouldn't be surprised if a woman comes out in the future alleging all kinds of things.
Unacceptable. Leave now.
Im actually cringing for you, and won’t interact with you further.
Excellent post. EspeciallyI'll admit that in the past I've had mates with dodgy attitudes. One in particular who treated women really badly - series of girlfriends, who he would always leech off, manipulate etc, as well as making lots of everyday sexist kind of comments. I think for a long time I took the attitude that it wasn't my place to get involved with other people's relationships - and the thing is with arseholes, they aren't one-dimensional, he could be the most generous and helpful person going at times. What made me take action in the end was that he got sucked into an alt-right anti-feminist worldview, which of course completely justified how he behaves, and after a furious row at a party (where he was later beaten up by the partner of a woman he belittled in some way) we parted company. I'm not really proud of the fact that it was much easier to confront him over political views than his actual real-world actions.
There are other people in my wider circle of friends, who are more acquaintances really, who I know have a bad reputation with women. They're not men I'd go for a drink with, just people I know, friends of friends, people who go to the same parties etc. I've had to help women friends avoid some of these characters at times. Ideally, people would collectively deal with these people, eject them etc rather than trying to manage the situations they create, but these men are often the type who quickly turn to violence, they are often charismatic and popular, despite how they might behave.
On another occasion I witnessed a man who I knew slightly drunkenly say something grossly sexual in a threatening way to a female friend in a pub, completely out of the blue. At the time I didn't confront him, but walked her home in case he followed. Then the next day I was fucking incensed and discussed it with people involved with the venue, people who lived in the same community (he was a boater) and tbh I got no support whatsoever. The general feeling was 'oh that's Paul for you, he's a disgusting sleaze, what can you do?'. From men and women. I think we are so conditioned not to make a fuss, and lots of people have the attitude that this is just something that happens that can't be changed, like the weather.
and the thing is with arseholes, they aren't one-dimensional, he could be the most generous and helpful person going at times
This is not on and he has been banned from the thread.Says a cis man. You're the biggest hypocrite in the world, wouldn't be surprised if a woman comes out in the future alleging all kinds of things.
I’m the biggest hypocrite in the world, he says. THE BIGGEST. You know that person you thought was a hypocrite? Yeah, even bigger than that.
Oh hang on, he doesn’t have a fucking clue who I am or anything about me. Other than that though, he must be right.
How are those memories of 1980-83 when “we” had a curfew coming on for you?
I think a men's march, to end/against male violence, would be powerful. Yes I know a to b marches don't change things, but as an act of solidarity that you yourselves organised, I would like that. Because for fucks sake, male violence is killing men too. Honour women, honour young men, get youth groups involved. Do something.
Since when was this a consideration?I'd happily go on that.
...but it'd get attacked by the cops and men defending themselves would be shown as violent men in the media and ....well, y'know.
I view any man who seeks peer approval and aspires to lead with deep suspicion.
Oh so what? Come up with your own plan then, but police brutality didn't stop women last night so do something. Reads like you (pl) don't actively intend on organising anything. Get your house in order. Talk to each other. I'm out.
I think a men's march, to end/against male violence, would be powerful. Yes I know a to b marches don't change things, but as an act of solidarity that you yourselves organised, I would like that. Because for fucks sake, male violence is killing men too. Honour women, honour young men, get youth groups involved. Do something.
I was thinking of this and in the context of the original post, a self-organised curfew for, I don't know, maybe even just one night, would be a powerful thing. Would never happen though because #myrights.In the current circumstances it really would be something for men to self-organise and show a public display of solidarity like this, and what that would communicate to other men especially those who harbour abusive attitudes to women, often not overtly.
I was thinking of this and in the context of the original post, a self-organised curfew for, I don't know, maybe even just one night, would be a powerful thing. Would never happen though because #myrights.
I like it far less than a march which I think would be very powerful, bringing it into the open, and a communication that it can be thought about, together, with other men. A curfew takes it out of the public and shared space and is hidden.
A self organised curfew would only work if enough people took part, which at the moment probably wouldn’t be enough to be noticeable.I dunno. I think the idea of a Friday or Saturday night (post-lockdown) where town centres, and pubs, and takeaways and streets are empty (or at least noticeably emptier) of men would be very powerful.
Like - a bit - when the streets are temporarily empty of cars.
The difficulty, of course, is getting enough men to do it so that it is notable.
Also, of course a self-curfew doesn't preclude a march and vice versa. I'd happily try both.
I dunno. I think the idea of a Friday or Saturday night (post-lockdown) where town centres, and pubs, and takeaways and streets are empty (or at least noticeably emptier) of men would be very powerful.
Like - a bit - when the streets are temporarily empty of cars.
The difficulty, of course, is getting enough men to do it so that it is notable.
Also, of course a self-curfew doesn't preclude a march and vice versa. I'd happily try both.