Supine
Newt Member
I'm in awe of people with that level of dedication tbh.
I only see doctors who have trained by watching DVD’s of House doing differential diagnosis.
I'm in awe of people with that level of dedication tbh.
I watched ER from the start during lockdown so am pretty much a fully-qualified doctor.I only see doctors who have trained by watching DVD’s of House doing differential diagnosis.
As promised here is my attempt to graph positive cases by age group for the London region. Obviously this wont show up any trends that are more localised than that.Mainly late 20s/early 30s.
I don’t think I can overstate the difference in perception that I observe between this message board and those I come into contact with in outside life, regarding how much a problem COVID is.
It's getting to the point where most of my friends and colleagues have had it at least once. I agree, it's definitely not at the same fear level as back in March 2020. And that's probably a good thing I think.This is just an observation, not a judgement. I am purposely leaving my own subjective opinion out, because it isn’t really relevant and I’m not even sure what it is anyway.
I don’t think I can overstate the difference in perception that I observe between this message board and those I come into contact with in outside life, regarding how much a problem COVID is.
For context, the people I come into contact with in outside life are those at work (the City), those in my living environs (a Surrey village), family and a handful of friends that don’t fit into other boxes. Almost to a person, it is clear that they just view COVID now as a background inconvenience that might make you ill for a bit but then you get better, so they aren’t going to worry about it. They’re fully vaccinated and that = safe in their eyes. They’ll comply with mask wearing when the rules ask them to (because rule obeying is baked into them), but they’re doing it because they obey rules, not because they’re actually fussed personally.
At work, as I’ve mentioned before, there is zero mask wearing in the building. Today was the Christmas do for the finance function — about 100-200 people in a basement room of a bar, no masks. A really high proportion have had COVID at some point in the last six months, and they got ill for a bit then got better. They‘re not bothered. It’s universally blamed on their kids getting it first. I don’t know about the wider City, but judging from behaviour in cafes I would say the same thing applies across the board.
In the village, there are a couple of people that remain worried about COVID, no doubt. Other than this small handful, though, when you talk to people, they dismiss the idea that there is something to worry about. They’re all fully vaccinated. Many of them have had COVID — they got ill for a bit then they got better. They caught it from their kids.
Family are a bit more circumspect but all of those with kids have had COVID, despite actually trying quite hard to avoid it. My sister finally ended up with it a few weeks back after 18 months managing to avoid it. It came from her son. Anyway, although I say they are more circumspect in theory, none of them are really avoiding living normal things in their lives.
I would say there is definitely a two-speed society developing on this. There are those whose availability bias has worked to deemphasise risk, because their experiences are that everybody just gets it in the end anyway and it’s not that bad anyway if you’ve been vaccinated. And then there are those whose availability bias has worked to re-emphasise risk, because they are avoiding places that might have it and watching the news, which is full of worries.
This is just an observation, not a judgement. I am purposely leaving my own subjective opinion out, because it isn’t really relevant and I’m not even sure what it is anyway.
I don’t think I can overstate the difference in perception that I observe between this message board and those I come into contact with in outside life, regarding how much a problem COVID is.
For context, the people I come into contact with in outside life are those at work (the City), those in my living environs (a Surrey village), family and a handful of friends that don’t fit into other boxes. Almost to a person, it is clear that they just view COVID now as a background inconvenience that might make you ill for a bit but then you get better, so they aren’t going to worry about it. They’re fully vaccinated and that = safe in their eyes. They’ll comply with mask wearing when the rules ask them to (because rule obeying is baked into them), but they’re doing it because they obey rules, not because they’re actually fussed personally.
At work, as I’ve mentioned before, there is zero mask wearing in the building. Today was the Christmas do for the finance function — about 100-200 people in a basement room of a bar, no masks. A really high proportion have had COVID at some point in the last six months, and they got ill for a bit then got better. They‘re not bothered. It’s universally blamed on their kids getting it first. I don’t know about the wider City, but judging from behaviour in cafes I would say the same thing applies across the board.
In the village, there are a couple of people that remain worried about COVID, no doubt. Other than this small handful, though, when you talk to people, they dismiss the idea that there is something to worry about. They’re all fully vaccinated. Many of them have had COVID — they got ill for a bit then they got better. They caught it from their kids.
Family are a bit more circumspect but all of those with kids have had COVID, despite actually trying quite hard to avoid it. My sister finally ended up with it a few weeks back after 18 months managing to avoid it. It came from her son. Anyway, although I say they are more circumspect in theory, none of them are really avoiding living normal things in their lives.
I would say there is definitely a two-speed society developing on this. There are those whose availability bias has worked to deemphasise risk, because their experiences are that everybody just gets it in the end anyway and it’s not that bad anyway if you’ve been vaccinated. And then there are those whose availability bias has worked to re-emphasise risk, because they are avoiding places that might have it and watching the news, which is full of worries.
Yeah, this. I recall the feeling that my IT abilities enabling me to move my various works online more or less at the snap of my fingers seemed like a huge Big Win at the time, but with hindsight (not that I'd do it any differently again), the smoothness and novelty of adapting to the initial crisis made it very easy - too easy - to withdraw into a safe bubble. Which I have had to work hard to overcome the psychological effects of, and which have undoubtedly contributed to the range of symptoms of depression and anxiety that I then began to experience, and am only now beginning to struggle past.Good post, and I’d broadly agree with this. I think people who have HAD to work outside the home throughout are generally less bothered because they are used to being out and about.
I feel a bit sorry for the people who have had the luxury of locking themselves away. During 2020 it was a great thing to do but i worry some won’t get back to normal, especially if they spend all their time reading about every little covid development.
I’m somewhere in the middle. Always out but still mask wearing and avoiding crowds.
Great appraisal, most people I know are also in the '54000 cases a day is of little concern" camp and as you say on other forums its slipped down the list of subjects below stuff like - Aldi have an offer on frozen shredded animal todayThis is just an observation, not a judgement. I am purposely leaving my own subjective opinion out, because it isn’t really relevant and I’m not even sure what it is anyway.
I don’t think I can overstate the difference in perception that I observe between this message board and those I come into contact with in outside life, regarding how much a problem COVID is.
For context, the people I come into contact with in outside life are those at work (the City), those in my living environs (a Surrey village), family and a handful of friends that don’t fit into other boxes. Almost to a person, it is clear that they just view COVID now as a background inconvenience that might make you ill for a bit but then you get better, so they aren’t going to worry about it. They’re fully vaccinated and that = safe in their eyes. They’ll comply with mask wearing when the rules ask them to (because rule obeying is baked into them), but they’re doing it because they obey rules, not because they’re actually fussed personally.
At work, as I’ve mentioned before, there is zero mask wearing in the building. Today was the Christmas do for the finance function — about 100-200 people in a basement room of a bar, no masks. A really high proportion have had COVID at some point in the last six months, and they got ill for a bit then got better. They‘re not bothered. It’s universally blamed on their kids getting it first. I don’t know about the wider City, but judging from behaviour in cafes I would say the same thing applies across the board.
In the village, there are a couple of people that remain worried about COVID, no doubt. Other than this small handful, though, when you talk to people, they dismiss the idea that there is something to worry about. They’re all fully vaccinated. Many of them have had COVID — they got ill for a bit then they got better. They caught it from their kids.
Family are a bit more circumspect but all of those with kids have had COVID, despite actually trying quite hard to avoid it. My sister finally ended up with it a few weeks back after 18 months managing to avoid it. It came from her son. Anyway, although I say they are more circumspect in theory, none of them are really avoiding living normal things in their lives.
I would say there is definitely a two-speed society developing on this. There are those whose availability bias has worked to deemphasise risk, because their experiences are that everybody just gets it in the end anyway and it’s not that bad anyway if you’ve been vaccinated. And then there are those whose availability bias has worked to re-emphasise risk, because they are avoiding places that might have it and watching the news, which is full of worries.
Around one in six adults in Britain believe that life will never return to what it was pre-pandemic, according to a new survey by the Office of National Statistics (ONS).
The results mark the highest proportion to share this view since the start of the pandemic.
The ONS opinions and lifestyle survey, conducted between 18 and 28 November, found that 16% of adults believed that life will never return to normal. This compares to 11% between 20 and 31 October.
OJ perhaps I will squeeze in one last comment about myself now.What gets me the most though, is the apparent discrepancy emotionally. I feel like we have been through (are going through) something very traumatic. All these drastic changes. I'm like - EVERYTHING CLOSED FOR SEVERAL MONTHS, SEVERAL TIMES, it seems quite...errr...major! (Let alone the illnesses and deaths, but those abrupt changes to routine and being unable to be close to loved ones were what affected me personally the most). My nervous system still feels like it's cut to shreds, and it would feel more appropriate to me to have a period of some kind of mourning and adjusting, rather than be flung back headfirst into capitalist consumer maelstrom. And I do wonder if this dissonance is also partly what is affecting MH for others.
One in four care home residents are reportedly yet to receive a booster shot, despite government promises that they would be offered one by the start of November.
Citing figures from NHS England, the Telegraph reports that only 72% of care home residents have so far received a booster dose.
At a press conference on 15 November, Boris Johnson said that 80% of eligible people in care homes had received a booster, but charities claimed the new data raises questions over the prime minister’s claim.
Meanwhile, government departments were reportedly cancelling Christmas parties yesterday, ignoring calls by the prime minister to go ahead with them.
The Times reports “Omi-shambles in Whitehall” as multiple government departments call off festive celebrations.
The education department has already suspended plans for its annual talent show, reports the newspaper, and the business department has decided against putting on a staff Christmas party.
It comes despite calls from senior government figures - including Boris Johnson (see also 9:33), Rishi Sunak and Sajid Javid (who has said the health department will not have a big party, but that he will take some staff out for dinner) - for big Christmas celebrations to go ahead, despite the threat posed by Omicron.
The British Medical Association (BMA) has said that people should be encouraged to “avoid large groups” and, where possible, meet outdoors during the festive period.
“The message to people is fairly straightforward, which is keep calm, carry on with your Christmas plans,” he told Sky News this morning. “We’ve put the necessary restrictions in place, but beyond that, keep calm and carry on.”
It comes after an influential scientist last night warned that he wouldn’t feel safe going to a Christmas party this year. Prof Peter Openshaw, a member of the Government’s New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (Nervtag), said the “chances of getting infected were too high” to have a party.
He told the BBC’s Question Time:
Asked about the prime minister’s comments on Christmas plans, he said:We have not been planning to have a Christmas party. Because with things as they are, regardless of Omicron, we thought that the chances of getting infected were too high.
Personally, I wouldn’t feel safe going to a party at the moment, if it involves being indoors in an enclosed space where you’re close to other people, and people are not wearing masks. Even if they’ve been tested and vaccinated, I wouldn’t feel safe.