Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Coronavirus in the UK - news, lockdown and discussion

Had forgotten that Gove gaffe- although to be fair to him masks were not yet mandatory when he went for his sarnie, so it's not quite up there with Sunak's three million missing self employed or Cuomo's 12,000 care home dead. Just makes him look like a bit of a twat (which, to be fair, he is) after telling people it was good manners. At least he bothered tucking his shirt in though, which is more than can be said for BoJo.
 
There is some appetite in the press to skewer Johnson to mark the upcoming anniversary of the first lockdown. And no shortage of people behind the scenes willing to drop the deadly shit in it.

This one focuses somewhat on 2nd wave errors. I think this sort of thing would have more teeth if the press in this country widely reported on the second wave by giving a total for 2nd wave deaths rather than mostly only ever mentioning overall totals of various sorts. I will cover the various totals for 2nd wave deaths later this week.


If the BBC want to understand more about various political influences at work in the shockingly shit September decisions, perhaps they could ask their own Nick Triggle why he was busy trying to undermine the modelling projections back then.

I dont think this is the first article recently that has started mentioning how they've learnt it was a meeting on March 14th last year which made clear to government the extent to which their expectations about the scale and timing of the situation were all wrong. But I will cover this subject when I do my next 'on this date in history' post tomorrow, as I'll be covering what happened since my previous Friday 13th date in history recap then. The meeting of the 14th as described is certainly consistent with the pieces of the puzzle we already knew.
 
My mood is too low (because of #20 ) to post what I had intended to today.

This will have to do instead.


The prime minister was even heard to say: "The best thing would be to ignore it." And he repeatedly warned, several sources tell me, that an overreaction could do more harm than good.
 
Last edited:

Bollocks. I guess that my and husband's vaccinations put back a month or so then :(

Ah shite. Just got so excited. Looks like booking has opened for 50+ today, and bf just booked his slots today. So still pleased about that, but really hoped it might be my turn in a couple of weeks, too!
 

Bollocks. I guess that means my and husband's vaccinations are put back a month or so then :(

So complex it's as opaque as it's possible to be. Vials, ingredients, complex processes. At least it's still 2 million a week, a lot more than nothing.
I was thinking the Moderna vaccine is due to be delivered in April, wonder what happened to that. 17 million doses. Wondering about the J&J vaccine too. It's available in the states.
 
Last edited:
Maybe it's already running out? I went for my vaccination on Monday, only to see a handwritten notice in the window saying they were cancelled and to re-book. Upon enquiry I was told the supply hadn't been delivered that day. I've re-booked for Saturday - at a different location - let's see what happens!
 
Bollocks. I guess that means my and husband's vaccinations are put back a month or so then :(
From that story's 'Analysis' by the (often correctly criticised) Nick Triggle :

Nick Triggle said:
What we do know is that for the next two weeks there is "bumper" supply thanks to a large shipment of AstraZeneca from India to supplement UK stocks.
It could mean more than four million doses a week being given.
That was always going to drop in April to under three million.
The latest news suggests it could perhaps go down below two million
which, given significant numbers of second doses need to be given from next month, would mean the rollout to the under-50s would be slower than some had started to hope.

:( :(

But how reliably established are those numbers?

And how easily might they be rectified?

Watch that space carefully, I'd suggest ... there could possibly? be an element of 'worst case scenario' spin included there. Maybe .......
 
Still happening,,according to the BBC story -- it seems to be April that's being highlighted as the main concern .....

It's a non story imo. Supplies will go up and down as batches are released and shipped. One week is a good news story and one week is a disaster story. I've not heard anything about serious issues in the supply chain so almost certainly just natural variation as batches arrive and get used.
 
Being a suspicious personage ...

I'm now wondering if the story about "potential shortages" - especially since Pfizer had a shortfall in February whilst they re-arranged their place at Puurs to actually make more - is intended to make people more eager to get a jab "in case they miss out" ?
and to counteract the publicity given to the European pauses (ref blood clots) - are those nations just stockpiling dozes ?

Or am I just over-thinking the matter ?
 
Being a suspicious personage ...

I'm now wondering if the story about "potential shortages" - especially since Pfizer had a shortfall in February whilst they re-arranged their place at Puurs to actually make more - is intended to make people more eager to get a jab "in case they miss out" ?
and to counteract the publicity given to the European pauses (ref blood clots) - are those nations just stockpiling dozes ?

Or am I just over-thinking the matter ?
It suggests a level of cunning that this government has hitherto conspicuously failed to display...
 
I doubt this will come of any surprise to anyone here, up to 27,000 extra deaths. :mad:

Delaying the winter lockdown caused up to 27,000 extra deaths in England, the Resolution Foundation thinktank has claimed as it accused the government of a “huge mistake” which should be central to any public inquiry into the UK’s handling of the pandemic.

In an assessment of policy over the last year, it said delaying the start of the latest lockdown until January, despite evidence of fast-rising cases before Christmas, led to around a fifth of all fatalities caused by the virus. It said these could have been avoided if restrictions were put in place quickly enough to prevent the death rate rising from early December.

While it praised the vaccination programme – delivering jabs three times faster than Europe – and financial support for firms and workers which has included £6,700 for every household on average, it said mistakes on lockdowns were repeated “three tragic times”. It added that allowing extra deaths did not limit economic impacts, but rather increased them, because it only precipitated longer and more onerous lockdowns.
 
Being a suspicious personage ...

I'm now wondering if the story about "potential shortages" - especially since Pfizer had a shortfall in February whilst they re-arranged their place at Puurs to actually make more - is intended to make people more eager to get a jab "in case they miss out" ?
and to counteract the publicity given to the European pauses (ref blood clots) - are those nations just stockpiling dozes ?

Or am I just over-thinking the matter ?

It seems due to a delay in AZ vaccine coming from India.
 
Being a suspicious personage ...

I'm now wondering if the story about "potential shortages" - especially since Pfizer had a shortfall in February whilst they re-arranged their place at Puurs to actually make more - is intended to make people more eager to get a jab "in case they miss out" ?
and to counteract the publicity given to the European pauses (ref blood clots) - are those nations just stockpiling dozes ?

Or am I just over-thinking the matter ?

Over-thinking and conspiratorial.
 
Perfectly plausible StoneRoad that some people with a background in marketing said it would drive uptake and make the Tory party look good overall, let's see if a story appears with the RAF flying it over next week .
 
Just announced on Sky News, there's going to be an extra Downing Street press briefing today, they assume at 5pm, with Johnson.

Possibly just an attempt to get some control of the vaccine narrative which is drifting away from them? Seems to be what politicians actually bother about rather than any new and useful information.
 
Possibly just an attempt to get some control of the vaccine narrative which is drifting away from them? Seems to be what politicians actually bother about rather than any new and useful information.

I suspect that will be the case, there doesn't seem much else to cover at the moment, beyond reassuring people over the Oxford/AZ vaccine, and explaining the shortfall of doses from India and its impact on the roll-out.
 
Being a suspicious personage ...

I'm now wondering if the story about "potential shortages" - especially since Pfizer had a shortfall in February whilst they re-arranged their place at Puurs to actually make more - is intended to make people more eager to get a jab "in case they miss out" ?
and to counteract the publicity given to the European pauses (ref blood clots) - are those nations just stockpiling dozes ?

Or am I just over-thinking the matter ?

If any legitimate public health professional was anywhere near the messaging on this they wouldn't stand for that kind of truth-twisting. There's enough bullshit around vaccines as it is without the good guys deliberately stirring in a bit more.
 
Back
Top Bottom