nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Busted flushes and one of them is a war criminal. Your choices say a lot about you.
Corbyn & Cabinet in the Media
- Thread starter ska invita
- Start date
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
A microscopic increase compared to the other parties, while the UKIP vote collapsed.
You're a glass half empty type, aren't you?
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Are you addressing that question to me?
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
there is no chance of anything decent with MarkyMarrk.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
you're very generous
quite, so stop poking him.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
who, MarkyMarrk?
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
c4u
Am I not allowed to type my opinion, because some can't argue with it?
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
show us an opinion, perhaps one which won't make you an object of derision.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
but answer came there none
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Typical. I think you'd really prefer this man.
I'd rather have Sir Stifford Crapps, over Killary Benn.
brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
Speaking as one, it is very evident that you really are the child of war children.
This is typical of the attitude of Corbynistas:
stethoscope
Well-Known Member
It isn't typical of anything you tit, its just some random fucking twitter conversation 
Now, how about offering up some actual political opinions and then robustly defending them?
Now, how about offering up some actual political opinions and then robustly defending them?
Nylock
I hate 'these days'...
find tweets by 80% of those who voted corbyn expressing the same regret and you will be correct in saying this is 'typical' of 'corbynistas'. Until then it's just more of the same disingenuous bullshitting by a bitter blairite.
existentialist
Tired and unemotional
tbh, the moment someone starts flinging around terms like "Corbynista" without irony, I start getting suspicious that there's an agenda (and that's as true of someone talking about "Cameronites" or "Blairites").
There's nothing wrong with having an agenda, so long as you're upfront about it, though. What's made this thread interesting for me, as a somewhat disinterested observer, is watching people debate in a civilised way without fucking the thing up with covert agendas. Or has, until now.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
It isn't typical of anything you tit, its just some random fucking twitter conversation
Now, how about offering up some actual political opinions and then robustly defending them?
Another case of MarkyMarrk shaping the evidence to fit his thesis.
Anyway, he's a Blairite/moderate/"sensible" Labour. He doesn't have any political opinions except the old my way or the highway schtick. Perhaps he was Peter Mandelson's wank sock in a past life?
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
MarkyMarrk's problem is that hardly anything he's retailing on here is (his own) original thinking, it's just simplistic nose-thumbing and chest-thumping rendered into "talking points".
Find a forum, facebook page or twitter stream that's done by a "moderate", and you see the same sort of quasi-incestuous mutual congratulation and hatred and contempt for "the other" that you'll also see on websites such as FreeRepublic. It's not exactly edifying to see, but it amusing to anyone who isn't wearing political blinkers.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
The Labour right can't be upfront about their agenda. Going back to the public saying "we want to carry on where the Tories leave off, but we'll do it with a smile on our faces" won't play, and they know it.
So instead they're utilising the very meme coined by the Establishment to corral Ed Miliband - they're projecting a pall of "far-leftism" onto someone whose leftism is both Parliamentarian and moderate. If Corbyn were as far left as some of "the resistance" and the media are happy to claim, he'd eschew Parliament for revolutionary activity, and if (as others claim) he's an entryist, then he's a sleeper who's played a convincing role for 40 years. They realise that if they can turn Corbyn into a folk devil, they can subvert his leadership. The problem is that they don't appear to realise that the folk devil of the powerful is often the folk angel of the ordinary people.
Can you try this without the homophobia please? It is objectionable and beneath you (I hope. I suggest so on the limited evidence I have).
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
for does it not say in the good book 'the devil rides a clapped out bike and comes bearing a flask of tea'?
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
There is no homophobia, except in your head. I could have said you were Margaret Thatcher's knicker gusset to achieve the same meaning - that your opinions are neoliberal dribblings.
Nice try, though.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
And that "verily he shall pretend to expose the corruption in the temple by not expelling the priests who join the maquis".
What a bastard, and how prescient was the good book!!!
But you didn't, and wouldn't. And the reason you didn't and wouldn't is because of not-very-well-hidden homophobia.
Similar threads
- Poll
