Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Corbyn & Cabinet in the Media

Kier Starmer's wikipedia page is very thin on the ground when it comes to political beliefs. What is he about? What does he stand for?
Politically he's pretty untested - only became an MP last year. Decent record as human rights lawyer before becoming the public prosecutor. Parachuted into a safe seat when Frank Dobson retired.

Here's his voting record so far. Not that bad. Voted against bombing Syria at least. Pro-fracking.
 
Milliband The Elder is in the USA. Come on mate, name someone that is ready to take the helm. Be serious for a second.

Miliband. D still sees himself as "the king over the water", although his petulance after Miliband. E won the leadership contest soured some of his devotees to his "charms".
One of the possible effects of the Corbyn turn is that given re-democratisation of constituency parties, Miliband. D may find it much harder to find a safe berth - or any sort of berth - within a system where candidates aren't centrally-imposed/"parachuted in" to CLPs.
 
Miliband. D still sees himself as "the king over the water", although his petulance after Miliband. E won the leadership contest soured some of his devotees to his "charms".
One of the possible effects of the Corbyn turn is that given re-democratisation of constituency parties, Miliband. D may find it much harder to find a safe berth - or any sort of berth - within a system where candidates aren't centrally-imposed/"parachuted in" to CLPs.
can't see dm ending as an alkie in rome tho stranger things have happened
 
Yes, I posted at the same time as you. You'll have to explain who that is, sorry. Is he the ex-soldier?

No, he's the former DPP/head of the CPS. He's about as political as a dry hump - one of those people who is attracted to and by power.
Dan Jarvis - the ex-soldier - may have "leadership skills" (although I'd argue whether modern military leadership skills - i.e. managerialist bollocks superimposed onto a pragmatic military command structure - aren't really what you need to lead a party), but he's about as politically-experienced as Miliband, and hasn't yet got over his need to be liked. Possible future party leader 10-15 years down the line, but now?That'd be a poor wager.
 
Kier Starmer's wikipedia page is very thin on the ground when it comes to political beliefs. What is he about? What does he stand for?

He doesn't really have any beyond a wishy-washy alignment to a little light Blairism. He's just another neoliberal pretending not to be a neoliberal.
 
Who wouldn't?

Oh, you meant up there as party leader. I thought you meant "...have Hilary Benn right up there" as in with a bayonet up his arse.
yeh he'd rather a vacuous red tory was leader of the lp, a man with less political nous than any of his intake at westminster. says a lot about mm and none of it good.
 
Pragmatic, anti-Tory.
There's lots I don't agree with him on, but that's OK. He's broad-church Labour, and I'm in favour of that.

Being anti-something is not something you stand for.

And being anti-Tory? Shouldnt that be kinda a pre-requisite for being Labour leader? This impresses you?

Plus pragmatism is a euphemism for "I'll bend as far as you want me to, here, take my arse" So I can see how that impresses you.
 
yeh he'd rather a vacuous red tory was leader of the lp, a man with less political nous than any of his intake at westminster. says a lot about mm and none of it good.

The only thing Killary has over the others is back-bench experience.
Just glad that limp dick Will Straw got knocked back at the GE. Ten quid Draw would have been a shoo-in as leader among some of the star-fuckers in the Labour Party - the sort who think Starmer is a contender, or who fawn over "the British Obama".
 
Back
Top Bottom