Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

campaign against welfare cuts and poverty

I don't need a financial product with budgeting tools which by the tone of voice the 'provider' is going to charge me for, my credit rating's perfectly good and I've got budgeting down to a fine art. What I need is weekly and fortnightly payments staggered like they are at the moment so the fuckers can't completely screw me over every time one of their departments decides to randomly suspend a payment for two weeks while they 'approve' a change of circumstances. All this 'it's to help you learn to budget for when you get a job' is total bollocks, because for the vast majority of UC claimants the kind of jobs they're going to be getting are low-paid, retail or call centre or labouring type work which is paid weekly anyway.
I know - it's complete bollocks. People on low incomes don't need budgeting tools by and large, they need the reassurance that their payments are secure, that they're not going to be sanctioned for an inordinate length of time for some faux misdemeanor and they certainly don't need to be charged for this bountiful 'advice', which is probably no more than a long recorded message at £1.50 a minute.
 
DWP Latest updates.
Three announcements regarding Universal Credit and the support given to claimants.




Supported accomodation being the most welcome exemption. Hostels, Refuges and their tenents must be breathing a small sigh of relief.

Do you know if this means they will be now be able to include service charges they could with HB, or does it just remove it from the UC benefit cap and allow direct payments?
 
Do you know if this means they will be now be able to include service charges they could with HB, or does it just remove it from the UC benefit cap and allow direct payments?

Had this link opened earlier to post up from HomelessUK Tom , but, I needed to sleep for a while...

Exempt Supported Accommodation UPDATED
The new system of delivery and administration of welfare – Universal Credit (UC) – which will come into effect in late 2013, had presented a real challenge for the DWP in terms of how the housing costs of ‘supported exempt accommodation’ would be managed.
Providing, maintaining and managing accommodation for a vulnerable person costs more than providing general housing. The exempt accommodation rule in housing benefit acknowledges this, and places these costs into housing benefit.
The DWP consulted on how the exempt accommodation rule and service charges will work under Universal Credit, which will centralise the housing costs system. The Department was inundated with responses from the sector.
In our response:
  • We asked the DWP to slow down as the risks in getting this wrong were too high.
  • We stated that the exempt accommodation as a concept is not flawed and;
  • We need a really robust alternative if it was to be changed.
We have continued to raise concerns of the sector both with officials and Ministers. They have listened.
A decision has been reached by the DWP and was announced by Lord Freud, Minister for Welfare Reform, at the Work and Pensions Select Committee on Monday 17 September.
Key points to note are:
  • Under Universal Credit, help towards the costs (both core rent and eligible charges) of supported exempt accommodation will be met outside UC.
  • In the short term this help will continue to be administered by the local authority.
  • Effectively, the housing costs for supported exempt accommodation will not move into UC when it rolls out next year.
  • When a resident in such accommodation makes a claim for UC they will receive the ‘standard allowance’ element but not the housing costs element, which will be delivered managed through the local authority, much the same as it is now.
In the short term help with housing costs for this type of accommodation will remain ‘on demand’. For the longer term DWP is exploring the feasibility of a localised scheme including how any funding mechanism might work.
We welcome this decision and are pleased that the DWP has listened to Homeless Link and others in the sector on the issues and risks.
We have time now to ensure that any new system for managing the costs of exempt accommodation is well planned, tested and workable before it goes live. We will be continuing to seek every opportunity to work with the DWP on developing this.
 
This morning, in a last ditch attempt to move things along, I emailed Liam Byrne and Anne McGuire. The time for "tinkering around the edges" had passed. Oh how I would like to tell you more, but I was clearer than I'd ever been.

Finally, after nearly two years of lobbying, pleading cajoling and VERY hard Paddington bear stares, with just a few days to go before conference, here are the words I've been waiting to hear. Enjoy.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/sep/26/labour-review-sickness-benefits-assessment



Big News!(?)

According to Sue Marsh(and it sounds a bit like she is claiming success) the LP are to review the WCA, etc, still think the thing will be here in ten years time..

plus Ch4 on Colin Traynor

nothing on the BBC, thought now Thompson had gone it might change...
 
Labour calls for review of sickness benefits assessment
Shadow work secretary Liam Byrne defends decision to introduce Work Capability Assessment but admits it is not working


Liam Byrne, shadow work and pensions secretary. Photograph: Leon Neal/AFP/Getty Images
Labour will call on Thursday for a "fast and fundamental" review of the test that determines who is eligible for sickness benefits, acknowledging that the policy the party introduced while in government is not working.

Launching a consultation with disability campaigners in Glasgow, the shadow work and pensions secretary, Liam Byrne, will defend his party's decision to bring in the Work Capability Assessment, which was designed to reduce the benefits bill, but will argue that the system needs to be reformed.
Speaking on Wednesday, Byrne said: "We have to be brave enough to say that even with initiatives we produced that are not working, we need to change them.

it may actually be significant and the Condems will have to respond,

wonder how the BBC will cover it?
 
Big News!(?)

According to Sue Marsh(and it sounds a bit like she is claiming success) the LP are to review the WCA, etc, still think the thing will be here in ten years time..

plus Ch4 on Colin Traynor

nothing on the BBC, thought now Thompson had gone it might change...
Had the conversation elsewhere that the 'Labourites' would be bouncing about this and taking the credit for convincing Byrne to have a rethink.

Generally the conclusion was come to that Labour were just at it for better poll results knowing that if/when it came to a vote it would be dropkicked out the HoC door by the coalition.

When they have it in their manifesto I'll perhaps consider giving them the benefit of the doubt.

Oh and Sue Marsh does like to pull the "I know something you don't know" nod nod wink wink thing when she can. Last time is was the collusion of charities with Atos/DWP on the new criteria. :facepalm:
 
Part of me thinks it can only be a good thing for labour to review the policy but i just can't see major significant changes happening.

I think it's possible labour will say that descriptors should be changed to better take account of variable conditions and/or new questions added for mental health conditions but it'd still be designed to remove people from benefits.
 
Part of me thinks it can only be a good thing for labour to review the policy but i just can't see major significant changes happening.

I think it's possible labour will say that descriptors should be changed to better take account of variable conditions and/or new questions added for mental health conditions but it'd still be designed to remove people from benefits.

Funny you should say that Tom..

Making rights a reality for disabled people. A discussion paper from the
Shadow Work and Pensions Team
pdf.

Just got this so the usual cuppa, read etc.
 
In November 2001 a conference assembled at Woodstock, near Oxford. Its
subject was ‘Malingering and Illness Deception’. The topic was a familiar one to
the insurance industry, but it was now becoming a major political issue as New
Labour committed itself to reducing the 2.6 million who were claiming Incapacity
Benefi t (IB). Amongst the 39 participants was Malcolm Wicks, then Parliamentary
Under Secretary of State for Work, and Mansel Aylward, his Chief Medical Officer at
the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP). Fraud - which amounts to less than
0.4 per cent of IB claims - was not the issue. The experts and academics present
were the theorists and ideologues of welfare to work. What linked many of them
together, including Aylward, was their association with the giant US income protection
company UnumProvident, represented at the conference by John LoCascio. The
goal was the transformation of the welfare system. The cultural meaning of illness
would be redefi ned; growing numbers of claimants would be declared capable of
work and ‘motivated’ into jobs. A new work ethic would transform IB recipients into
entrepreneurs helping themselves out of poverty and into self-reliance. Five years later
these goals would take a tangible form in New Labour’s 2006 Welfare Reform Bill.

http://www.lwbooks.co.uk/ebooks/Welfare Reform (revise).pdf


Malcolm Wicks MP has just died, he was the N/L minister who can be seen as one of the key architects of the welfare reforms which are bringing misery and penury to millions and in some cases death.He was there right at the start attending the seminal welfare conference(see above) which has ultimately led to what we are witnessing today. Milliband has just described him as ''compassionate and humane''.....
 
Well treelover, I'd like to say that I'm compassionately and humanely sorry to hear of his demise. I can't though and won't. Kinda hope he spins in infinity, the git TBH...
 
New Civil Penalty for Claimant Error pdf

From 1st Oct 2012.

What are Civil Penalties?
Civil penalties: A new Civil Penalty of £50 is being introduced for claimants who incur an overpayment caused by:

either (a) negligently making incorrect statements and failing to take reasonable steps to correct the error

or (b) failing, without reasonable excuse, to provide information or to disclose changes in their circumstances.
The penalty will only be for cases of claimant error. If the claimant is successfully prosecuted for a fraud or offered an administrative penalty or caution they cannot then be issued with a Civil Penalty for the same offence.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will impose a Civil Penalty where appropriate whilst for Local Authorities it is a Permissive Power and they may impose a civil penalty.
The Civil Penalty will only apply if the overpayment is incurred wholly after the date of commencement of the legislation, which is from 1 October 2012.
 

I fear this is going to become a substantial revenue stream for the government as advice services get overwhelmed. Does it detail what might be considered "reasonable steps" to correct an error. Presumably the vast majority of people won't know they've made an error until they get fined so that's just bullshit isn't it?
 
What the suffering fuck now.

I fear this is going to become a substantial revenue stream for the government as advice services get overwhelmed. Does it detail what might be considered "reasonable steps" to correct an error. Presumably the vast majority of people won't know they've made an error until they get fined so that's just bullshit isn't it?
I bet they can still sanction you as well as this fine.

They're probably planning to use it to show that their 'war on benefits claimants' is creating revenue.
 
According to Guardian CIF comments, Ed Balls on 5 Live has said he will not be reversing the Condems abolition of DLA/:mad: PIP plans...

Do these people have any relatives who are sick or disabled, i watched Jim Murphy(ex pres NUS) play football against the Journo's and it was obvious they have no awareness of what it is like to be chronically sick, etc even more survive on benefits..

btw, i presume Murphy( who as welfare secretary initiated ESA)goes to see his local team play, can you imagine a similar politician who had (for example) brought in the Means Test in the 1930's being welcomed to the ground, not a chance, , what a de-politicised country we now live in...
 
Axemen ATOS face £40m payday for work making disabled Scots miserable
Daily Record.

Titled “Atos Risk Management Plan”, the dossier shows a predicted £40,535,679 profit from the £206million Atos contract for Scotland and northern England.
That would pay the disability living allowance of 10,851 people for a year, based on the average weekly payment of £71.84

SNP Aberdeen MSP Stewart used freedom of information laws to request details of the deal for Scotland and northern England.
The DWP tried to keep the vast Atos profits secret by blacking out the figures before sending the paperwork. They claimed, to Stewart’s fury, that they were protecting “commercially confidential” information.
But the blundering bureaucrats failed to censor the documents properly, and the staggering sums became visible when transferred to another computer format.
:facepalm:
 
Food banks have become part of the system, part of our so-called welfare state, almost without anyone noticing. They planned this.

Household incomes in Wales fell by an average of £80 per month in one year, official figures have shown.
Office of National Statistics figures from 2009/10 to 2010/11 say average UK weekly income fell from £373 to £359, with average household income in Wales 12% lower than the country as a whole.
At the same time over the past year, the number given food parcels in Wales has reached a record 23,000.
"It was gut-wrenching [to ask for help]. Not even a second-class person, something beneath a slug. Food prices keep going up and wages just stay the same."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-19785134
 
Food banks have become part of the system, part of our so-called welfare state, almost without anyone noticing. They planned this.<snip>
Food banks also made the local (London) ITV news last night - with a woman who used one saying how ashamed she was to apply for benefits and what a relief it was to be able to go to a food bank instead. :mad:
 
Food banks also made the local (London) ITV news last night - with a woman who used one saying how ashamed she was to apply for benefits and what a relief it was to be able to go to a food bank instead. :mad:

:facepalm::mad::mad:
 
Labour will make cuts to welfare budget if it wins 2015 election, says Liam Byrne
Shadow work and pensions secretary points to resentment of benefit claimants and says social security must be 'reinvented'

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/oct/02/labour-cuts-welfare-liam-byrne

N/L to continue its onslaught on claimants and the welfare state, no mention that they created much of that resentment with their constant 'anti-fraud' campaigns leaks to the tabloids, ministers like Blunketts comments about sick people on IB ''sitting around watching TV all day''

are delegates going to sit there, clap, etc or are they going to speak out...

btw, they really pick odious twats like Byrne(former banker) to be DWP Secretaries, etc, I also smell Purnell in all this...

This now gives carte blanch to the Tories to keep cutting, etc, triangulation still lives..
 
Should claimants be paid vouchers to stop spending on 'vices'?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politic...66#TWEET248904
'Feckless' claimants
Labour MP Debbie Abrahams, an aide to shadow health secretary Andy Burnham, said she backed the idea, in principle, of using pre-paid benefit cards to encourage people to make healthy eating choices by offering discounts on fruit and vegetables, for example.

But she rejected the "obnoxious" suggestion that "feckless" benefit claimants blew all their money on "fags and booze", instead of feeding their children.

In the United States, people on "food stamps" are given a pre-payment card that they can use to buy food and other essentials -but not luxuries such as alcohol and tobacco.

The introduction of the Universal Credit next year, which will see six work-related benefits rolled up into a single payment, potentially opens the door to a similar system in the UK.

The speed all this is happening at, is breathtaking, and NL endorsing it but on positive health grounds is just sophistry...

Some, including Mastercard, which sent along a representative to the Demos fringe meeting, are pushing for the combined payment to be loaded on to a pre-paid card. If such a card were to be introduced, explained Matthew Mayo,
Mastercard's head of business development in the UK and Ireland, claimants could be blocked from using online gambling sites, for example, but not from buying booze at a supermarket. Cards could also be used to incentivise healthy behaviour, he added, and some local authorities are already experimenting with such a policy

Ah, the corporates smell money and of course, how democratic is all this?....
 
Income Management for Liverpool’s Destitute?

Here we go...

Liverpool City Council’s (LCC) Citizen Support Scheme (CSS) will replace Crisis Loans and Community Care grants on the 1st of April 2013. One of the scheme’s proposals is to abolish cash payments in favour of food vouchers and utility pre-pay cards. Liverpool City Council offer no clear justification for abolishing cash payments other than it being part of, what they describe as, “holistic support”.
We see it as control over the poor.
Until April 2013, Crisis Loan and Community Care grant recipients will have the autonomy to purchase the items they require from the stores they choose. The CSS will remove that autonomy and replace it with restricted, and potentially monitored, methods of payment.
The Australian government has been trialing what could be the eventual conclusion of ‘reforms’ to the UK Social Fund: Income Management for the poor.

Income Management is a policy which "quarantines" 50 – 70 per cent of Centrelink payments onto a BasicsCard. This card can only be used to buy "priority items" at government approved stores. http://www.sayno2gim.info/
Income Management targets people in poverty with punitive measures that encourage the treatment of welfare recipients as feckless, and would fit neatly into the UKGov’s tales of fraud, criminality and disorder allegedly rampant in the districts of Blighty. Personally, we call those tales survival, but it makes no odds to the privileged-in-power intent on wiping out welfare on behalf of their Capitalist chums.

CSS is punitive, demeaning, and a potential precursor to a UK-version of Income Management; we also see similar control measures being put into place in other areas of welfare, particularly relating to disability & back-to-work welfare.
 
Back
Top Bottom