Not sure where to put this but wanted to get it off my chest. I do Housing Benefit work and just had a woman who has had the new "living" wage increase on her pay which worked out at a whopping £8 a week. This has now been reduced by a reduction in housing benefit and council tax support of £7.13 a week. so her net increase is 87p a week. what a complete con.
BBC reporting on pay to stay council rents are describing it as an end to subsidised rents (used this term twice).
Today in Parliament I think, last night 11.30.On which programmes, please?
Today in Parliament I think, last night 11.30.
what stinks there is that they know the money for appeals will be there, that govmnt will pay the deparments bills. So the idea to charge has nothing to do with money saving and everything with trying to reduce the embarrasing figures showing appeals being won overwhelmingly more often than lost. The devios shitsSecret DWP plan to CHARGE disabled people to appeal benefits decisions revealed
DWP had secret plan to start charging for disability benefit appeals never actually put forward as policy I think
Amusing poll at the bottom, do you trust the dwp? 99% say no
Loach film on shame of poverty in Britain moves Cannes to tears
Director Ken Loach denounced the British government's "conscious cruelty" towards the poor Friday after his film about the poverty and humiliation inflicted upon them by welfare cuts had critics at the Cannes film festival in tears.
The left-wing director, who turns 80 this year and is known for shining a light on the downtrodden, also got lengthy applause and shouts of "Bravo!" at a press conference after "I, Daniel Blake" was screened.
It tells of carpenter Daniel Blake's Kafkaesque journey to get benefits in Britain after suffering a heart attack and being told by doctors he can no longer work.
The movie's writer Paul Laverty said the research team was stunned at how people with mental health issues and disabilities were targeted by the welfare cuts.
He said people interviewed within the Department for Work and Pensions told them "they were humiliated at how they were forced to treat the public. There is nothing accidental about it."
The story taps into the despair over rising unemployment and austerity in Europe after the financial crisis.
"When I read the script I thought we have really got to make this straight away, it's such an important story to tell," producer Rebecca O'Brien said.
The movie was warmly received by critics and Variety magazine called it "a work of scalding and moving relevance."
Loach film on shame of poverty in Britain moves Cannes to tears
do they serve spam?
Ah I should explain there was a shedload of spam postings above that one of mine concerning some eating establishments but they've been removed now.At room temperature, in thick slices.
Ah I should explain there was a shedload of spam postings above that one of mine concerning some eating establishments but they've been removed now.
Shoulda happened.tbh I hadn't thought of that.
A project run by Oxford city council and the Department for Work and Pensions found long-term jobless claimants were 2% less likely to find work for every pound of income lost through housing benefit cuts.
The EU-funded project sought to help unemployed claimants who faced housing benefit cuts as a result of the government's benefit cap and other welfare changes.
Every week Charlotte sees desperation at first hand – outside the job centre
Frances Ryan
Her group have been helping jobseekers exposed to the vagaries of Britain’s benefit system. She says people feel like criminals in a culture of fear
It will be two years this summer since Charlotte Hughes and her group of activists in Ashton-under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, first gathered outside the local jobcentre to try to address some of the damage they believe it’s causing.
Hughes’s heavily pregnant daughter, then 19, had just been hit with a three-year benefit sanction. Her offence, Hughes says, was telling a workfare interviewer that she was pregnant, which meant she couldn’t take part in the unpaid labour needed to keep her benefits. “She was crying afterwards,” Hughes tells me. “She had to come back and live with me – she had no electric, gas, or food.”
Hughes made a decision there and then to get justice for – in her words – the “sitting ducks” exposed to Britain’s benefit system: jobseekers, low-waged workers, and claimants struggling with disability or mental health problems. On a Thursday morning in August 2014, the 44-year-old stood outside Ashton-under-Lyne’s jobcentre for two hours with a few friends: offering words of support to people going through the doors, pointing out local services, and handing out information leaflets on benefit rights (correcting misinformation given by the jobcentre is key, Hughes says).
They have been there every week since. The size of the group fluctuates, from three to 30: it includes retired people, the self-employed and former benefit claimants who have seen the system first hand. The important thing, Hughes says, is that they’re a constant presence. “Welfare rights are overrun. Citizens Advice too. But we’re right outside. Every week. They know where to find us,” she says. “That space outside the jobcentre is a safe place. Because they’ve not got one inside.”
Every week Charlotte sees desperation at first hand – outside the job centre | Frances Ryan
have you ever thought of doing something similar?Well done Charlotte and group, wish there were more like you.
Andy was badly injured on an oil rig. Yet he’s been judged ‘fit for work’
Frances Ryan
He’s apparently not disabled enough for sickness benefits – but he’s too disabled to stand a chance in the job market, and he’s hungry
Andy was badly injured on an oil rig. Yet he’s apparently still ‘fit for work’ | Frances Ryan
Still the brutalities continue.
WTAF?