Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

British IS schoolgirl 'wants to return home'

why do you think that ? :rolleyes:
because of the way she has been demonised in a way that no one else with any possibility of returning has been. and then you look at the women who are undoubted british citizens as in the link i posted and they're being effectively left to rot. i think there's more than a hint of misogyny about the whole thing
 
because of the way she has been demonised in a way that no one else with any possibility of returning has been.
I don't think the press would be obsessed with a male Shamima in this way, and I don't think the male Shamima's thread would be this many pages on here either, but the idea that the government wouldn't have stripped male Shamima of his citizenship doesn't follow at all, imo.

eta i hate the ruling, i'm a person with the same conditional citizenship as her (just because my parents were born elsewhere) and i didn't know that and think its completely wrong. But i don't think its sexism.
 
I don't think the press would be obsessed with a male Shamima in this way, and I don't think the male Shamima's thread would be this many pages on here either, but the idea that the government wouldn't have stripped male Shamima of his citizenship doesn't follow at all, imo.
i would be frankly astonished if there's not a man in the same position as regards nationality as her. 900 or so men went to fight for daesh and many of them must have had south asian heritage.
 
i would be frankly astonished if there's not a man in the same position as regards nationality as her. 900 or so men went to fight for daesh and many of them must have had south asian heritage.
yeah, i thought this had been done to others , like them. Has it not then?
eta oh it has, plenty. i think these are mostly men.
 
yeah, i thought this had been done to others , like them. Has it not then?
eta oh it has, plenty. i think these are mostly men.
from the 2019 link BillRiver and i have posted you'll see they don't say whether or how many people have had their citizenship withdrawn because they went to join daesh
 
Not particularly. If I'm discussing whether the UK state is racist or not I'm not particularly bothered about whether it's followed its own laws or not.

I would be, but that definitely wouldn't be all I'd be interested in with regard to that issue. Far from it.
 
I see, but you suspect that none of these were Daes- joining men because the gov haven't disclosed so you reckon it's because she's female that this has happened to her? I remain unconvinced.

I think the others weren't solely British citizens.

I think a number of factors (her age, her sex, the fact she was a British schoolgirl, her children...) led to her getting more media attention than them.

I think the media attention led to a "court of public opinion" scenario based on minimal facts which influenced the UK government.
 
I see, but you suspect that none of these were Daes- joining men because the gov haven't disclosed so you reckon it's because she's female that this has happened to her? I remain unconvinced.
i am not surprised

she has been more harshly treated than anyone (bar john amery) who was involved with the british freikorps. i don't myself see what she has done is on a par with someone who took up arms for daesh: you do. i repeat, i am not surprised.
 
Not particularly. If I'm discussing whether the UK state is racist or not I'm not particularly bothered about whether it's followed its own laws or not.
It's not like Athos is constantly raising the issues though. Other people are. If people keep making the same mistakes, as BillRiver has done here, he's correct to point them out.
 
Athos appears to be stuck in the mentality of an undergrad law student, still imagining the law is black & white, with no grey areas at all...
 
she has been more harshly treated than anyone (bar john amery) who was involved with the british freikorps...

A good number of them got a Paveway through the windscreen. You can argue whether death is a more severe treatment than Begum has received, but let's not pretend that the others got 2 days cessation of chocolate ration.
 
i am not surprised

she has been more harshly treated than anyone (bar john amery) who was involved with the british freikorps. i don't myself see what she has done is on a par with someone who took up arms for daesh: you do. i repeat, i am not surprised.
i don't know what it is you're trying to say but if its that i'm probably a big misogynist okay.
 
This is wrong:



Athos has told you why.
No, he's explained the legal reasoning behind the decision. He's also explained the difference between de jure and de facto citizenship. De facto meeting any reasonable person's definition of 'actually having a usable dual nationality' which Shamina Begum doesn't. The fact that they've rules on the basis of de jure citizenship is neither here nor there. It just makes you happy because it's what you want.
 
The court found that she did have Bangladeshi citizenship (automatically, by virtue of her parentage, as per Bangladeshi law).

And yet Bangladesh disagreed.

As I pointed out already and am happy to keep repeating.

Things really aren't as black & white as you seem to believe/wish they were.
 
Back
Top Bottom