Athos
Well-Known Member
It's not just the legal case (yawn) that's up for discussion surely? It's the public perception and the press's obsession with this woman that's the real topic of discussion.
Yes, both aspects are significant.
It's not just the legal case (yawn) that's up for discussion surely? It's the public perception and the press's obsession with this woman that's the real topic of discussion.
there's women who are undoubted uk citizens in the camps who were trafficked and are told they've no chance of being brought back to the uk
View attachment 266227
there's women who are undoubted uk citizens in the camps who were trafficked and are told they've no chance of coming back to the uk
View attachment 266227
For the purposes of a legal challenge to a decision of the UK Home Secretary bought in the English courts, they're the only forum empowered to decide that point!
No. Pointing out SpookyFrank's mistake as to the legal power of English courts to decide such questions is in no way an endorsement of their morality.and they're an emblem of morality, right?
yes, i was and now i am pointing out there are other women who should not have any obstacles placed in the way of their return, british women, who are basically being dumped in the camps. i thought you might have something other than 'does not compute' to say about this but i see that the slightest deviation from something about citizenship on this thread and you're flummoxed.You're moving the goalposts. You were comparing her case with those of men who've returned.
courts of law not courts of justiceand they're an emblem of morality, right?
yes, i was and now i am pointing out there are other women who should not have any obstacles placed in the way of their return, british women, who are basically being dumped in the camps. i thought you might have something other than 'does not compute' to say about this but i see that the slightest deviation from something about citizenship on this thread and you're flummoxed.
what, women who have been trafficked and raped? what do you want them tried for?I'm not flummoxed at all. I'd like them to be tried locally.
I don't know why you have such a problem with this. He's absolutely right.Oh god. Please not the objective legal expert schtick again.
what, women who have been trafficked and raped? what do you want them tried for?
Because its all he got.I don't know why you have such a problem with this. He's absolutely right.
Tried for any crimes of which they're suspected. If they've been coerced, they should be acquitted. Any British citizen who isn't suspected or who is acquitted ought to be able to return to the UK.
but not i see those found guilty who have served their sentences. i wonder why not.Tried for any crimes of which they're suspected. If they've been coerced, they should be acquitted. Any British citizen who isn't suspected or who is acquitted ought to be able to return to the UK.
Then it's incumbent on the international community to facilitate such fair trials.But where there is no possibility of fair trial so no one can be acquitted, what should happen then do you reckon?
Then it's incumbent on the intensively community to facilitate such fair trials.
I overlooked that group, but you're right - they should be allowed to return, too.but not i see those found guilty who have served their sentences. i wonder why not.
Typo. Corrected.Huh?
Then it's incumbent on the international community to facilitate such fair trials.
Then it's a case of competing priorities, including public safety and principles of natural justice. I'm not sure where to draw the line; whether it's on a general basis, or case-by-case. But, broadly speaking, I'd tend towards bringing even dangerous people back rather than having them rot in limbo indefinitely.In situations where that is not possible?
nothing in any of your posts about timely trials. nothing in your posts about helping people find witnesses who could offer either evidence of innocence or mitigation who in the ebb and flow of war and pandemic may have ended up far afield. not to mention that it may be difficult to find counsel in those parts of the world at the best of times. in a similar situation british courts would struggle to offer any genuine form of justice but i suggest it's going to be a mountain to climb for someone without any secondary education, relatives or indeed money in a foreign country in which she's been assaulted and imprisoned to manage to represent herself effectively.Then it's incumbent on the intensively community to facilitate such fair trials.
Then it's a case of competing priorities, including public safety and principles of natural justice. I'm not sure where to draw the line; whether it's on a general basis, or case-by-case. But, generally speaking, I'd tend towards bringing even dangerous people back rather than having them rot in limbo indefinitely.
nothing in any of your posts about timely trials. nothing in your posts about helping people find witnesses who could offer either evidence of innocence or mitigation who in the ebb and flow of war and pandemic may have ended up far afield. not to mention that it may be difficult to find counsel in those parts of the world at the best of times. in a similar situation british courts would struggle to offer any genuine form of justice but i suggest it's going to be a mountain to climb for someone without any secondary education, relatives or indeed money in a foreign country in which she's been assaulted and imprisoned to manage to represent herself effectively.
is there legal aid available for trials abroad?I think trials should be as timely as possible, and that British citizens should get legal aid and effective representation.
what makes you say that?i'd say it's what she's got between her legs which really differentiates her from the fighters who've come back.
If there's not currently, there's no reason why that can't be changed.is there legal aid available for trials abroad?
because i think it's truewhat makes you say that?
there isn't any aid for iraq or syria Legal aidIf there's not currently, there's no reason why that can't be changed.
why do you think that ?because i think it's true