ska invita
back on the other side
I dont understand Malthouse
With a majority of 50+, she could have pushed through a deal without ERG support. I think that was her plan with calling that election - judging that a majority of 12 wasn't enough to get any deal through. But without any majority at all, that plan went up in smoke. It's one of the many absurdities that she's just blundered on without a hope of success. I can only assume that she hoped Labour would split on the issue and help her out. I don't see what other idea she might have had.Even then it would have been pretty marginal surely... I mean on pure numbers she’d still be losing. Though of course many other factors would be in play, which is why counterfactuals are a bit crap.
It won't pass in Parliament..so don't waste too much brain-space on it.I dont understand Malthouse
doneIt won't pass in Parliament..so don't waste too much brain-space on it.
It won't pass in Parliament..so don't waste too much brain-space on it.
I thought it was still possible to import unicorns tariff-free via the Irish borderI thought the unicorns had been indefinitely detained at Calais.
They all voted against the deal (with Labour).
it wasI thought it was still possible to import unicorns tariff-free via the Irish border
I dont understand Malthouse
Total aside, but did you know on the UK crest like on the passport the lion represents England and the unicorn ScotlandI thought it was still possible to import unicorns tariff-free via the Irish border
Yes, I didTotal aside, but did you know on the UK crest like on the passport the lion represents England and the unicorn Scotland
Read that yesterday
either you've misread 4 independents voting with the tories as 4 independent (group) voting with the tories, or they had it listed wrong. Either way, all 11 independent group members voted against.BBC had them split...
Yes. I assumed most people knew that.Total aside, but did you know on the UK crest like on the passport the lion represents England and the unicorn Scotland
Read that yesterday
Campaigning journalist Carole Cadwalladr pushing the suggestion that the Leave EU lobby's next move will be to convince international allies in Italy (& perhaps Hungary) to veto Article 50 extension. I don't know how credible this is or isn't. Presumably if the EU's senior managers want an extension, then they'll have some fairly weighty & obnoxious leverage of their own to exploit in order to assure the necessary unanimity.
quimcunx likes thishave you ever noticed the quim on the crest?
View attachment 164352
At that point she had the assumed power to drive through a deal without a vote in the house. The High Court changed that.The process was doomed the moment the 2017 election results were announced. I suspect that May has known this all along. But she's blundered on regardless, doing exactly what she was planning to do with the majority of 50-80 that she expected.
I kind of hope A50 does get blocked. Leaves a few days of genuinely meaningful action to sort this out without it dragging on for however long. Same difference bodging it this last week or the last week in May.
And if the link there is true shows up the cuntish forces at work nicely
she also just posted
Good point. I'd forgotten that one in the long list of things this government has lost.At that point she had the assumed power to drive through a deal without a vote in the house. The High Court changed that.
I kind of hope A50 does get blocked. Leaves a few days of genuinely meaningful action to sort this out without it dragging on for however long. Same difference bodging it this last week or the last week in May.
And if the link there is true shows up the cuntish forces at work nicely
she also just posted
I kind of hope A50 does get blocked. Leaves a few days of genuinely meaningful action to sort this out without it dragging on for however long. Same difference bodging it this last week or the last week in May.
And if the link there is true shows up the cuntish forces at work nicely
she also just posted
So it'll be catastrophic no deal or catastrophic revoke a.50.
Hmm
Wonder which parliament would go for
Nobody on this thread seems to know. I bet Pickers could tell you though.How did the Tinge party vote?
Campaigning journalist Carole Cadwalladr pushing the suggestion that the Leave EU lobby's next move will be to convince international allies in Italy (& perhaps Hungary) to veto Article 50 extension. I don't know how credible this is or isn't. Presumably if the EU's senior managers want an extension, then they'll have some fairly weighty & obnoxious leverage of their own to exploit in order to assure the necessary unanimity.
It has been pointed out this morning that in pursuit of an independent trade policy the UK is heading for a no deal in which it puts up tariffs. The price of an imported family car will go up by about £1500. Oh - except if the dealer imports it from IE into NI and then sends it to the UK.
BBC had them split...
That one bit I can answer. The EU ruling (ECJ, was it?) stated that A50 can be unilaterally revoked as long as the UK has followed its own constitutional procedures. That has been widely interpreted as meaning that the government goes to parliament and the parliament votes.- The UK revokes Article 50. This doesn't require agreement of the other EU nations. We're in such a constitutional mess that I'm not sure whether May can just do this unilaterally on behalf of the Government, or requires the agreement of Parliament. If it's the latter, well, I wouldn't put much money on it happening.