I've drank with gosub he's sound. It was a shit joke though.There are plenty of legitimate reasons why someone might want to criticise Diane Abbot, but the attacks on her numeracy are clearly motivated by misogyny and racism.
I've drank with gosub he's sound. It was a shit joke though.There are plenty of legitimate reasons why someone might want to criticise Diane Abbot, but the attacks on her numeracy are clearly motivated by misogyny and racism.
It’s just the poster in question has never come across as racist or mysogynist to me in the past.There are plenty of legitimate reasons why someone might want to criticise Diane Abbot, but the attacks on her numeracy are clearly motivated by misogyny and racism.
Thank you.It’s just the poster in question has never come across as racist or mysogynist to me in the past.
Youtube has been dishing me up a lot of Norm Mcdonald. A genius when in the zone, but... Algarhthyms [emoji102]I've drank with gosub he's sound. It was a shit joke though.
Your list of legitimate reasons has been tested and given the all clear for being free of misogynistic and racist motivation, we can assume?There are plenty of legitimate reasons why someone might want to criticise Diane Abbot, but the attacks on her numeracy are clearly motivated by misogyny and racism.
What does this mean? The side socialists should be taking is the side of the working class, that means the not picking one team of capital over another.I suppose as a socialist you have to take a side. As in: you can't be partly for the cause that you espouse if you want them to disappear. That you have contempt and disgust at this establishment. Not that it is all somber discipline. On the contrary, it is fellowship for a justice that is commanded by basic rights, and the right thing to do.
We know where their way has led for so many and where it is leading to for so many more. Therefore, oppose if you going to oppose and team up against them. Its sounds dramatic but something needs to switch. That may require great change, but why should we be wary anymore? There is still more than enough for us all in the present and the unclaimed future. It's not a pipe dream. It is self-evidently the correct way to do things. It comes down to survival and justice.
i supposed that 'as a socialist' you'd already have a sideI suppose as a socialist you have to take a side.
i supposed that 'as a socialist' you'd already have a side
I’d have gone fries and coleslaw.I went for fries. Should have been good and picked coleslaw.
i supposed that 'as a socialist' you'd already have a side
should have been good and picked your proper chipsI went for fries. Should have been good and picked coleslaw.
Did you see Chuka and the gang at Nandos?I went for fries. Should have been good and picked coleslaw.
Did you see Chuka and the gang at Nandos?
They seem like pretty reasonable guys, who also like evidence-based policies and finding common ground.Of course. I'm always at Nando's.
I like those guys. They're proper ordinary people who like spicy chicken just like me.
They seem like pretty reasonable guys, who also like evidence-based policies and finding common ground.
Vegetarian. Like Hitler.Not like that Marxist Jeremy Corbyn. I bet he never goes to Nando's.
Vegetarian. Like Hitler.
You referring to the TIGgers or the staff in Nando's?They seem like pretty reasonable guys, who also like evidence-based policies and finding common ground.
Vegetarian. Like Hitler.
And me. I'm worse than Hitler.
That guarantees your face won’t be used for target practice though.
because the paras have never heard of youBecause I'm vegetarian?
Because I'm vegetarian?
I went for fries. Should have been good and picked coleslaw.
Coleslaw is apparently worse for you than fries, the "good" side dishes are stuff like raw carrots, but who's going to go to a restaurant and pay money for raw carrots? The Guardian could probably make this into an extended Brexit analogy.
because the paras have never heard of you
because the paras have never heard of you