not a trot
Well-Known Member
All he has to do is walk in with a rolled up copy of the DM under his arm, ask where the bog is, and she'll be putty in his hands.
Or as Abbott would have it 98754321%.I'm certain the right's obsession with Abbott is 100% healthy and above board.
Fuck off.Or as Abbott would have it 98754321%.
"Hello Theresa, if you could just show me where you keep the magic money tree...?"
Got to be worth 20 bil. Then do what the DUP did and vote against her anyway.If the DUP's support when it suits them is worth a billion.....
Let's be fair, it's been a collective effort.Saying PM has "made his job irrelevant"
he was a junior minister in the department for exiting the EU.Chris Heaton-Harris, junior minister in the department for attempting to exit the EU has resigned. Saying PM has "made his job irrelevant"
Who he?
Why didn't the Leader of Change UK appear?
The moment when "that guy" joins the conversation at a party and everyone stops talking
Most interest news of the day I think.. The next step
Who would win from that?
The moment when "that guy" joins the conversation at a party and everyone stops talking
If the DUP do what they say they'll do, they'll put revoke ahead of May's deal. That leaves it in Labour's court, just about. In that situation, if every Labour MP voted 1. Labour deal 2. Revoke, then one of those two should get through.May's deal or revoke. Probably May's deal I think.
Is one of many obvious questions. It was billed as a 'joint press conference', so my guess is Umunna was there as their spokesperson doing the speaking.Why didn't the Leader of Change UK appear?
Dont want to get too ahead of ourselves, but if Labour Deal (which means CM2) or Revoke won, how are the Tories going to implement that?If the DUP do what they say they'll do, they'll put revoke ahead of May's deal. That leaves it in Labour's court, just about. In that situation, if every Labour MP voted 1. Labour deal 2. Revoke, then one of those two should get through.
If that is CM2, which I hope it is (as in it includes a largely preserved freedom of movement and means scrapping the settlement scheme), it's actually the easiest brexit to implement, practically speaking - certainly loads easier than May's thing. Revoke, meanwhile, is really really easy to implement. Can do it in an afternoon. As for the political practicalities, well that's their problem.Dont want to get too ahead of ourselves, but if Labour Deal (which means CM2) or Revoke won, how are the Tories going to implement that?
LOL
Only to break a tieIndicative vote tied, 310 noes and ayes.
Speaker cast his vote no. I didn't think he could vote?
Yeh, just watching it now. I didn't think I could get anymore confused with this shite.Only to break a tie
But wawasn this a vote for further debate?And then only in favour if it's not a final vote, so if there was to be further debate he could vote aye.
I wasnt clear, I meant how will May implement it without having her party kick her out before she finishes uttering the words! Fact is no Tory party leader would be allowed to implement what would be seen as a Labour plan, and against the stated party membership. Now that would be a constitutional crisis if it gets that far!If that is CM2, which I hope it is (as in it includes a largely preserved freedom of movement and means scrapping the settlement scheme), it's actually the easiest brexit to implement, practically speaking - certainly loads easier than May's thing. Revoke, meanwhile, is really really easy to implement. Can do it in an afternoon. As for the political practicalities, well that's their problem.
I'm keeping my money firmly in my pocket, but I'd be betting first on something like CM2 and second on Revoke at this moment. Thing with Revoke is that on the day it happens, it may feel momentous, but we'll all wake up the next day to find that its only effect is that nothing has changed. I would predict brexit dying with a whimper rather than a riot in such an eventuality.
But wawasn this a vote for further debate?
But wawasn this a vote for further debate?