Puddy_Tat
naturally fluffy
So, who's risking more going into this meeting, and who's got better odds of coming out of it on top*?
*which, in this context, generally means not as deep in shit as the other.
has to be auld corbyn as there's no more that can be said about him to rubbish him more than he has been already
dunno really.
i can't see this going well.
if the talks don't lead to anything and we end up with no-deal, then the tories and their friends in the press can say it's all corbyn's fault (and the labour /remain voters will be pissed off) -
or if we end up with a long extension to article 50 then same again but with the labour / leave voters pissed off.
or if the outcome is a softish brexit, then the tories and their friends in the press will say corbyn has betrayed brexit and it's all his fault (and the labour / leave voters will be pissed off because it's not really brexit, and the labour / remain voters will be pissed off because it's still a brexit of some sort)
i'm inclined to think that a principled decision would be to tell the tories this is a shambles of their own making and not to get involved, but i can see that wouldn't play well.
i don't think corbyn has got the political / weasel skills to come out of this well. i can't see the press - whatever the outcome - hailing corbyn as the country's saviour for sorting out this bloody shambles.
Tbf, Osborne's on-going feud with May does produce some good LES headlines...
the line of the evening sub-standard over the last year or two has tended to be how bloody awful may is but corbyn would be worse