Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Black and Track

Yeah, Stanley, the same person who got banned and his posts deleted for telling a train driver, who had someone jump in front of his train and kill himself, that he should pull his socks up and his article in the experience was shit. Yeah, fucking great poster that.

You're another fucking idiot I take it?
Once again, Im not fussed about your opinion.

The fact you cant see how you're behaving or how you look speaks volumes.
You've lost control.
 
Lower body fat content, higher bone density = less buoyance = more effort put into staying afloat and subsequently less energy for speed.

Its physiologically simple.

Dunno about sprinting tho - can't think of any obvious physiological racial differences that would have an impact.

Yeah, I am aware that the Kenyan long distance runners have an advantage due to genes that are particularly well adapted to high altitude, which gives them an advantage at lower altitude in terms of oxygen take up in the blood!
 
Boo fucking hoo, another fucking idiotic monkey gets upset.

You should fuck off urban again.
 
*dances to Firky's tune*

See I reckon you would actually be alright if you weren't so precious, you do have some good stuff to say now and again. You just have a habit of making yourself look like an idiot (yeah irony intended).
 
See I reckon you would actually be alright if you weren't so precious, you do have some good stuff to say now and again. You just have a habit of making yourself look like an idiot (yeah irony intended).

You on the otherhand are admired and revered for your intelligence, maturity and openmindedness. :D
 
Yeah, I am aware that the Kenyan long distance runners have an advantage due to genes that are particularly well adapted to high altitude, which gives them an advantage at lower altitude in terms of oxygen take up in the blood!

Long distance runners have a greater amount of slow twitch muscle fibres, sprinters more fast twitch. Now whether that is genetic and therefore giving someone a predisposition to be good at one or the other or whether this is due to adaptation of the slow/fast twitch fibres (the 3rd type that are neither) that become differentiated after training.

I find it really interesting - time to brush up on the muscle physiology methinks:)
 
Yeah, that's right. And in your head the guy who mentioned jungle was insinuating what exactly? :rolleyes: I really expected more than that of you, haylz. Manipulatation, eh? I know you have a habit of loyally defending some of the biggest idiots on urban but I didn't think you'd go to this level.

She is a fucking monkey. I play the same tune and she dances. A fucking monkey.


oi you- think better of me indeed im a wrongun like you you muppet, but i dont like your vibe with rutita - never have and you do get a kick out of donning the same double entendres time after time.......

Level??????- check yours you idiot:D
 
I wonder how much, climate, environment, nurture etc... can influence though.

Yeah, of course its going to have some impact, but as far as I'm concerned the main elements for someone to be an elite athlete are genetics, training and grim determination (not necessarily in that order)
 
Yeah, of course its going to have some impact, but as far as I'm concerned the main elements for someone to be an elite athlete are genetics, training and grim determination (not necessarily in that order)

Well yes, that's what i've always thought. I can see that certain body shapes/types have an advantage, not least because they are easier to train and get results....for me that's where the genetics angle comes in.

I know some folk with extremely athletic builds but are the laziest and least physical folk. Maybe it's a question of potential.
 
Long distance runners have a greater amount of slow twitch muscle fibres, sprinters more fast twitch. Now whether that is genetic and therefore giving someone a predisposition to be good at one or the other or whether this is due to adaptation of the slow/fast twitch fibres (the 3rd type that are neither) that become differentiated after training.

I find it really interesting - time to brush up on the muscle physiology methinks:)

It is interesting. It's also something which probably does have a genetic factor, even if it is enhanced by training - after all, it's unlikely they would have gone through that much training if they didn't have an aptitude for the sport.

And genetic traits can cluster in certain areas. That doesn't mean that black people tend to be better at athletics no matter where they're from, just that, if your ancestors are from an area that has that gene cluster (for environmental reasons that led to that trait giving evolutionary advantage), you're more likely to be better at that particular type of athletics.

It shouldn't be controversial, really. It's almost the same as saying that, if your ancestors are from Scandinavia, you're more likely to have blue eyes.
 
Back
Top Bottom