Given that Flavour's contributions today have been deranged nonsense about Russian invasion, a call for the EU's non-existent airforce to shoot down a Belarusian MIG inside Belarus, and now this misinformation/ "far right" nudge-nudge wink-wink about some logo he pulled out of wikipedia's arse, I think we can conclude that he's not really posting on this thread in good faith.
What exactly does "posting in good faith" mean? They're separate observations but seeing as you've got your knickers in a twist over it allow me to elaborate.
1. I would not support a Russian invasion of Belarus, and appreciate people's comments here saying they'd have no reason to do so: but the idea that Russia
would never invade Belarus is preposterous. If the opposition protests had looked like toppling Lukashenko do you really think Russian intervention on the ground would have been
unthinkable? Given their previous form in several other ex-Soviet states and ongoing conflict in Ukraine, I find it rather easy to imagine such a situation unfolding. Repeat: I would not support any such action. I hate Lukashenko and Putin.
2. I did not
call for the EU to send fighter jets into Belarusian airspace nor claim they
should shoot down Belarusian jets. Jesus Christ. I am saying that from the EU's point of view, geopolitically, in order not to get fucked over and humiliated on the world stage and particularly with regards to Russia, then that would have been the way to react to this. Obviously such action is next to impossible in real terms, but this might push the EU towards more integrated military structures. DISCLAIMER: I would
not support a more integrated EU military nor would I have
supported military action against Belarus by this hypothetical quick-drawing EU Air Force. I'm merely observing that one of the reasons Belarus knew it would get away with this is because it knew the EU would not respond, would not call their bluff in the moment. Many others have made similar comments. I do not support the EU.
3. The fact that Belarus's shitty authoritarian government pulled this shit against Ryanair/the EU, an action which I wholly condemn, does not make an iota of difference to who the journalist was who got kidnapped and arrested. I had
never heard of him before this incident, which I would say is probably true for nearly everyone on this thread, besides you. Be that as it may, I am not a fan of the "enemy of my enemy" doctrine and therefore the fact this guy got arrested did push me towards his Wikipedia page, yes. It's the first source of info for so many things... it's hardly "pulling it out of Wikipedia's arse" -- your language seems to suggest resentment and frustration... but why with me? Because I've read the Wiki page of someone I'd never heard of? Get over it.
4. The Wikipedia page does claim he has been a member of this Young Front group since 2011. Are they wrong? If not, what's the problem with saying it? How is that misinformation? It's just information which doesn't fit a very neat black and white narrative of the young journalist hero-martyr. I do not support his arrest and kidnapping, for the nth time... but I'm still interested in who he is and what he thinks (because of this incident)... that doesn't necessarily have to mean
his politics are commendable. Opposition to Lukashenko comes from many different sections of society, including, as
seems to be the case with Roman Protasevich, the right. I will happily retract "far right", which I only said I got whiff of from that Instagram picture because that symbolism is very common among far-right ultras across Eastern Europe and indeed Russia itself. Didn't say he
is far right. But I'll happily say he
seems to come from that Christian Right scene, which, despite being in opposition to Lukashenko, is not a scene I have any time for. Doesn't mean I don't want him to freed immediately. But nor would I necessarily want the guy anywhere near a position of power in Belarus, for a variety of reasons, as goes for basically all people who mix Christianity with nationalism and stuff.