Beaten to it!
BTF took years to write and a long time to publish. This was necessary because of the scope and size of the project and was, IMO, well worth it.
Rather than a website/talking shop I would favour a straight forward...
"I am/we are compiling a book of anecdotal recollections of the anti-fascist struggle in the 80's & 90's. It will be readily available (and probably free of charge) as an e-book within 3 months. It will be an organic document in that it will grow with time, so people can add to it as it goes on.
If you would like to contribute... do feel free to do so. If you would prefer a protracted, circular debate about who has the right to publish what, on behalf of whom... do feel free to g'way and fuck yourself"
There is a time for 'democracy' and inclusive discussion... and a time for just getting on and doing a thing.
The young ones need to learn.
The young ones need to learn.
I didn't mean to be patronising - it is just the case that each generation of the Left seems doomed to repeat most of the mistakes of the previous generation
- certainly in terms of inter group sectarianism stopping the Left working together.
Other things though - like an awareness of systematic state infiltration of groups needs to be constantly remembered by activists. For example, the SWP had a state agent on their Central Committee, Roger Rosewall, for over 20 years - for all the years of the IS/SWP's maximum impact in the industrial struggle in the mid 70's , Rosewall was their National Industrial Organiser !
There are also all sorts of operational techniques, intelligence gathering and other methodologies that anti-fascist activists are more effective knowing about - rather than having to re-learn yet again through trial and error.
It was indeed John 'Spurs against the naartzis' Deason.
What new groups? Physical force anti fascism is hardly the tactic that is required currently is it?
I didn't mean to be patronising - it is just the case that each generation of the Left seems doomed to repeat most of the mistakes of the previous generation
- certainly in terms of inter group sectarianism stopping the Left working together.
Other things though - like an awareness of systematic state infiltration of groups needs to be constantly remembered by activists. For example, the SWP had a state agent on their Central Committee, Roger Rosewall, for over 20 years - for all the years of the IS/SWP's maximum impact in the industrial struggle in the mid 70's , Rosewall was their National Industrial Organiser !
There are also all sorts of operational techniques, intelligence gathering and other methodologies that anti-fascist activists are more effective knowing about - rather than having to re-learn yet again through trial and error.
Crivvens, just read through the whole of this thread which took 2 sittings. Noticed someone had pasted the review by ‘Malatesta’ in it (#529). Not sure why the review is ‘sniffy’ as it says that the book is a good read (and its been reread several times here)...
From experience AFA Northern Network was much more anarchist especially in places like Liverpool and Bolton. The book does focus more on London and Red Action and it is debatable that it gives an in-depth description of the activities up north.
We are not talking about an 'Anarchist Cookbook' 'how to...' guide here, are we? To superimpose a 20 year out of date physical anti-fascist model onto the current political situation? That would be the antithesis of everything AFA worked for and believed in.
Despite the best efforts of many lefties to label and deride them, AFA always had an either/or/both methodology when weighing up whether a physical or ideological strategy suited a particular context.
So I don't see a book doing much harm by exposing strategies etc.
And the technology differences.... makes much of the methodology obsolete
and the passage of time... means the old bill would have minimal interest in pursuing any cases... which are all easily deniable.
tbh... All this cloak and dagger stuff is coming across a little bit indulgent, if not leaning towards "Walter Mitty"... IMO anything less than a free and frank passing on of all the knowledge and accumulated wisdom is a betrayal of the next generation... but what we will really be passing on is a mindset ( a way of being and thinking) not a blueprint, because our tactics were 'steam-age'.
Often we never even had mobile phones - as in not a single one! - nowadays digital technology and social media make a nonsense of 'no platform' and many traditional lefty responses.
What new groups? Physical force anti fascism is hardly the tactic that is required currently is it?
So we should write the book in Russian then?
действительно ли Вы безумны?
к черту с этим, другом
Care to write in english. I don't know slavonic languages.
nor do I, Tovaritch, nor do I... (Google is your friend).
and the comments in Russian are as relevant to this discussion as the video you posted... ie not relevant at all.
What new groups? Physical force anti fascism is hardly the tactic that is required currently is it?
I was trying to make the point that physical confrontation was needed in countries such as Russia at the present time. Obviously things here are different. You ain't acting like a tovaritch.
Just pointing out that the two situations ( in GB and the Urals) are totally different and you can't necessarily transpose tactics and strategies from one to the other.
An outstanding contribution to the debate here in a 'review' of red pepper's review of BTF
http://theenglishdefenceleagueextra.blogspot.com/2011/03/working-class-just-doesnt-buy-swps-red.html
This reviewer is clearly a Cavan farmer (out standing in his own field).
Never mind, I'm sure it all makes perfect sense in his own little pea-brain. Reminds me of a number of Urban posters.