friedaweed
Me and me girl named Jane
Having met both of you in person I'll refer you to my earlier cigarette paper analogy.Pah. Even I won't get banned for calling Bellend a cunt!
Having met both of you in person I'll refer you to my earlier cigarette paper analogy.Pah. Even I won't get banned for calling Bellend a cunt!
Not the sort of thing they mention on news at tenWho is paying the 20 year old legal fees here
Tanya1982 , obs the only one who could afford it.Who is paying the 20 year old legal fees here
I'm not sure it was that rosy in the first place. There is the possibility that the extremely rich person, whomever that is, at the centre of all might end up providing such a service via agents."The firm that the young person has instructed to contact the BBC is not a modest, high street firm, they are a multinational practice so they know what they're doing.
They have repeatedly emphasised that their client alleges this is a breach of their privacy."
Good. I hope the mum did get some £££ from the Sun for her story because its probably cost her her relationship with the 'child' she was so worried for.
If there's the decent prospect of a big payday courtesy of News International I can see very expensive lawyers falling over themselves to do this pro bono.Just the sort of firm a 20 year old with no connections would use.
Who is paying the 20 year old legal fees here
Thought same.I'm not sure it was that rosy in the first place. There is the possibility that the extremely rich person, whomever that is, at the centre of all might end up providing such a service via agents.
Knowing which door to walk through thoughIf there's the decent prospect of a big payday courtesy of News International I can see very expensive lawyers falling over themselves to do this pro bono.
I think it’s fascinating from a media culture point of view - same as the Schofield circus. I really couldn’t give a toss who it is, the gossip side is of limited interest to me. The press in the UK is unreal - they aren’t happy until they kill someone, which depending on how it’s measured they’ve done a few times, and then after a day or a drip feed of obsequious shite they feed on the corpse.if they were to successfully sue the sun for printing shit about their client (after the 'victim' told them not to print) there'll be loads of money to share, any self respecting lawyer would take a punt on that i reckon. Plus the publicity.
Lots of people will know this person's name and where they live.Knowing which door to walk through though
I find this so bizarre its interesting,Thought same.
Do feel sorry for the mum
Oh Frieda. That’s a metaphor, not an analogy.Having met both of you in person I'll refer you to my earlier cigarette paper analogy.
The brief you want for this sort of thing isn't the sort whom has their clerk make unsolicited sales callsLots of people will know this person's name and where they live.
I'd put a spoiler on that. As much as I think the site owner would love to see his demise I don't think it's fair to speculate that the U2 frontman might have anything to do with this case.If there's the decent prospect of a big payday courtesy of News International I can see very expensive lawyers falling over themselves to do this pro bono.
You are correct. I've had a long day and I am in no fit place to arbitrate between you pair of likeable cunts.Oh Frieda. That’s a metaphor, not an analogy.
So, basically, he's been wasting his money on the anti-histamines?Oh Frieda. That’s a metaphor, not an analogy.
They do have some strange stuff in Iceland.Come back Bejam all is forgiven
That the Beeb are untrustworthy scum and should be abolished.
My suppose arteries are working just fine thanks.So, basically, he's been wasting his money on the anti-histamines?
There are just too many ways to parse this sentence, I’m going to have to ignore it.So, basically, he's been wasting his money on the anti-histamines?
And that Rupert Murdoch is......better? Somehow?That the Beeb are untrustworthy scum and should be abolished.
The link isnt what it used to be, Comcast have owned Sky since 2018. Murdoch doesnt have 21st Century Fox these days either, Disney got it. He's still got Fox News though.You'd think is some kind of link between the Sun and the world's biggest subscription TV service they way they've been trashing a license-fee TV model broadcaster for years.
I'm thinking s/he might have the twitchiest bottom right now.Sensing that the big winner here is going to be the crack dealer.
The link isnt what it used to be, Comcast have owned Sky since 2018. Murdoch doesnt have 21st Century Fox these days either, Disney got it. He's still got Fox News though.
Could be anyone with a grade against the sunWho is paying the 20 year old legal fees here
Well as much as I know you can't trust what's written in the Sun (back in the day my Mum never recognized her stories when they bought them) . However taking what's been published at face value the Mum has fairly decent motives. The Beeb fella no matter what, is in damage limitation and the 20 year old, most likely will end up feeling deprived of a gold egg laying goose. Agree though it is the 20 year old life and their life choice.I find this so bizarre its interesting,
I mean of all the people to feel sorry for in this shitshow why the mum ?
Maybe you can imagine being so upset about your 20 year old child's life choices that you feel you have no choice but to phone the Sun Newspaper against their wishes?