After Russia suspended the treaty with the USA over nuclear weapons has that put the world in a new cold war?
is Russia alone in this cold war against NATO and USA or will they drag China in with them and how close is the world to a new world war if things escalate?
That last sentence rings true. The recent quite forthright talk from China describing the west as adversaries seems almost like something Putin would say and combined with the negative appraisals coming out of the US administration don't encourage a positive path, making the likelihood of China supplying arms to Russia seem a real possibility....then what happens?War in Ukraine defining new world order, says thinktank
Poll reveals west more united but gulf growing with countries such as India that do not subscribe to post-cold war viewwww.theguardian.com
'Almost a year after Russia’s war against Ukraine started, it has united the west, according to a 15-country survey – but exposed a widening gulf with the rest of the world that is defining the contours of a future global order.
The study, by the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) thinktank, surveyed opinions in nine EU member states, including France, Germany and Poland, and in Britain and the US, as well as China, Russia, India and Turkey.
It revealed sharp geographical differences in attitudes to the war, democracy and the global balance of power, the authors said, suggesting Russia’s aggression may be a historic turning point marking the emergence of a “post-western” world order.'
“The paradox of the Ukraine war is that the west is both more united, and less influential in the world, than ever before,” said Mark Leonard, the thinktank’s director and a co-author of the report, based on polling carried out last month.'
you say that. but the security of the suez canal relies on the stability of the arab states, notably egypt and saudi arabiaI'm not sure that's the right way around - as the west uses less oil, it becomes less interested in the security of the gulf kingdoms (as well as a view forming that supporting them is more trouble than it's worth) and you can add the US's slaps on the wrisst of KSA for their brutality in Yemen to that general mood music, so KSA et al are starting to look outside their traditional 'partners' for their security.
I would add that KSA has always had an eye on an 'or else...' option - it's relationships with the west have never just been about being friends(ha!) with the west, but about not being friends with the Sovs. And to be be a realistic threat, they've always had to maintain a relationship with the Sovs/Ira/etc..
you say that. but the security of the suez canal relies on the stability of the arab states, notably egypt and saudi arabia
if there's a desire to project power into the pacific then i suggest you do want the suez canal open. this doesn't mean the burden should fall entirely on eg the uk and usa. you'd have thought the people sending stuff (merchandise) through the canal would have as much interest in keeping things flowing as the people receiving it.It does, but that also falls under the 'is this more trouble than it's worth?' idea - would it be catastrophic if instead of having to maintain (almost) client relationships with these states in order to have safe passage through the Suez Canal, we simply put more fuel in our ships, sailed them round South Africa, and let the ME get on with it?
I think it's a bit simplistic, and ignores the ability of the ME to reach out and purely thinks about our need to reach in, but I think we need to address the elephant that if the ME matters a great deal less than it once did, do we need to be quite so involved in what goes on there...
Is that to make them more electable?Relevant (jokes about relevance of the green party accepted on a postcard only please)
Green Party abandons opposition to NATO
The party now supports reform of the alliancebright-green.org
I doubt it's a cynical as that, I think it's a sign of the shift in public thinking about UK and the military... Aulde New cold war mentallity take overIs that to make them more electable?
It isn't only right wingers like Peter Hitchens who have been pointing out that yesterday's CND types are now often enthusiastic NATO fans and enthusiasts for 'liberal interventionism..'I doubt it's a cynical as that, I think it's a sign of the shift in public thinking about UK and the military... Aulde New cold war mentallity take over
Saw some interesting stuff about Taiwan's importance in microchips Council Post: The Microchip War Requires Strategic Innovation To Win
That's where the real action will focus
they're not worth as much as they used to be, hands off warnings.Hasn't the US issued a 'Hands off Taiwan' warning?
Tbf CND themselves are not of that position.It isn't only right wingers like Peter Hitchens who have been pointing out that yesterday's CND types are now often enthusiastic NATO fans and enthusiasts for 'liberal interventionism..'
This has been building since the 1990s. At the time of the Kosovo war, there was a Doonesbury strip where the hippy character expresses his bemusement at the fact that they now had pro-war rallies. The persistent problem of human rights violations, including torture and sexual violence, commited by the forces sent to do the "liberal intervening" has rarely penetrated the consciousness of those who advocate "liberal interventionism".It isn't only right wingers like Peter Hitchens who have been pointing out that yesterday's CND types are now often enthusiastic NATO fans and enthusiasts for 'liberal interventionism..'
No. I was thinking more of the types who were once likely to support their aims.Tbf CND themselves are not of that position.
Isn't that pretty much the same for every country?, sure some pretend that the countries they don't deal with is because of moral factors but they always seem to be coincidently unstable countries anywayPotentially Leaning more towards China benefits both parties here. PRC doesn’t care where is oil comes from as long as it’s stable.
Loads of these types on urban. Add in the anti capitalist self identified posters, the ones with huge enthusiasm for that Uber capitalist organisation the EU and it’s time to scratch one’s head.It isn't only right wingers like Peter Hitchens who have been pointing out that yesterday's CND types are now often enthusiastic NATO fans and enthusiasts for 'liberal interventionism..'
No it's just showing their true colours.Is that to make them more electable?