CrabbedOne
Walking sideways snippily
Proposes the US:
- Creates a series of "safe zones" in Syria
- This to include the US endorsing a permanent Turkish presence
- Guaranteeing a permanently divided Rojova with two Apoist statelets
- Giving the PKK heavy weapons on a promise to hand them back after Raqqa
- While offering bribes in the form of aid to ensure that
- Putting in US troops to eventually serve as peacekeepers
- And then waiting until Assad falls at some unspecified date in the future and reuniting Syria
I'm a bit afraid that something along these lines is what happens by default if Trump focuses on Syria. Bashar is 51 and might well still be in power in 2030. It's likely the PKK and Turks will still be going at each other at that date. Turkey actually can't leave as its rebels cannot stand up to the PKK or even what is left of IS. There is going to be an Eastern Rojova that's firmly in the R+6 orbit and a Western one that the US may have influence in but this may also gravitate to Damascus as without a repaired relationship with Turkey Assad is really the only viable commercial partner for their bulk hydro-carbons and the regime now controls a GLOC to the comrades in Afrin.
As for reunifying a soft partitioned Syria consider the autonomous KRG set up in the 90s began with a intra-Kurdish civil war and it never really reintegrated into Iraq. It never even unified its rival party militias. It's viable mainly because Barzani reconciled with the Turks. He'd have been wiser to also build a better balancing relationship with Baghdad and not endlessly bang on about an unlikely independence. Lately it has suffered like authoritarian Rojava from the domination of a single party if to a lesser extent. Heavy US support to the KDP has only made this worse. The KRG is far from perfect but it is a genuinely US friendly Central Asian Stan. Too little attention has been paid to Irbil's fraying legitimacy as it was mainly valued as a partner against IS. It needs pushing in better directions and so does Rojava which may prove far less stable than the KRG.
This may be a transitional arrangement as IS is likely to linger on as an insurgent actor but the US has to focus on the mess it's partly created in NE Syria in the struggle against IS not simply declare victory and drift away once Raqqa has fallen. That means being almost as worried the war in SE Turkey as the Turks are. Seeing broader Turkish-Kurdish relations as being key to regional stability in a way Palestinian-Israeli squabbles simply are not anymore.