CrabbedOne
Walking sideways snippily
In The National The tale of two victories against Syria's worst killers
There are Shia towns nearby but Aleppo certainly isn't a Shia city, neither has it been a Salafist one. Both could be thought of as alien intrusions and it’s biased to blame the former entirely for the latter. The sectarian and occasionally genocidal rhetoric of parts of the revolt is not new just growing more blatant. It is at least partly a product of this ultra-conservative regional trend. Neighbouring Idlib has become steadily more Salafist. A product of radical preachers funded by Gulf donors for decades. It’s proving a fine nesting spot for AQ.
The Syrian revolt is mainly a provincial and rural affair. The commercial capital Aleppo was slow to rise. There were some protests in the university area but it was Salafi of various strains coming in from the urban slums and countryside that really kicked things off.
It's often overlooked in our press but most of the city’s population (75%) has remained in regime hands. Plainly that part contains a lot of loyalists and sophisticated folk who would rather keep their heads down. They are mostly conventionally lax Sunni Arabs who were not doing too badly in 2012. The sort of stern Wahhabi Sharia much of the revolt in Idlib now favours often isn’t welcome.
Really there are two sieges in Aleppo in place. One side’s offensive has air power the other human ordinance. You could consider Idlib and Aleppo as one strategic area. This counter siege came in from the Northern countryside supplied via Turkey.
Hassan Hassan isn't often so critical of the rebels and he compares them unfavourably with the PKK here....
More disturbing was the name the rebels chose for the battle to break the siege in Aleppo. The operation was dubbed the "Ibrahim Al Youssef battle", after the militant who gunned down dozens of his colleagues at the Artillery Academy in June 1979, as part of a Muslim Brotherhood insurrection against the rule of Hafez Al Assad. Captain Al Youssef reportedly separated Alawites from Sunnis and killed them. During the offensive in Aleppo, a spokesman for the JFS-led forces said they would do the same to Alawites today.
None of the participant groups, which ranged from moderates to jihadists, objected to the name choice. As it turned out, a non-jihadist group was the source of the name. One of Al Youssef’s sons, Yasser, is a commander with the Zinki, a faction that took part in the operation and was until recently backed by the United States.
Yasser posted a message he said he received from Ahrar Al Sham’s political officer, Mr Al Nahhas, who is often portrayed as a moderate. In the message and separate posts, Mr Al Nahhas glorifies the militant and depicts the operation in Aleppo as revenge for Al Youssef. Referring to Al Youssef, the message posted by Yasser reads: "Today is your day, our day, the day of the father, those who fought as strangers and who were wronged by everyone. Today, we give them back the respect and regard they deserve."
Similarly, a member of a currently US-backed group near Damascus said this about Al Youssef: "My dear sir, my commander, the mission has been completely successfully. What you started in the past is being completed today by your sons."
This was unmistakably a new low for the Syrian rebels. Even Muslim Brotherhood officials have distanced themselves from Youssef, who was a pioneer of the Fighting Vanguard, a militant Brotherhood offshoot.
The sentiments shown towards his legacy also say a lot about the extremism of the government side, especially given the growing presence of foreign Shia militias in Aleppo, a predominantly Sunni city. But it is also clear that extremist rebel forces are seeking to drag more people into their unabashedly sectarian rhetoric, which the opposition should resist if it wants to avoid helping Bashar Al Assad in the same way the Fighting Vanguard helped his father.
...
There are Shia towns nearby but Aleppo certainly isn't a Shia city, neither has it been a Salafist one. Both could be thought of as alien intrusions and it’s biased to blame the former entirely for the latter. The sectarian and occasionally genocidal rhetoric of parts of the revolt is not new just growing more blatant. It is at least partly a product of this ultra-conservative regional trend. Neighbouring Idlib has become steadily more Salafist. A product of radical preachers funded by Gulf donors for decades. It’s proving a fine nesting spot for AQ.
The Syrian revolt is mainly a provincial and rural affair. The commercial capital Aleppo was slow to rise. There were some protests in the university area but it was Salafi of various strains coming in from the urban slums and countryside that really kicked things off.
It's often overlooked in our press but most of the city’s population (75%) has remained in regime hands. Plainly that part contains a lot of loyalists and sophisticated folk who would rather keep their heads down. They are mostly conventionally lax Sunni Arabs who were not doing too badly in 2012. The sort of stern Wahhabi Sharia much of the revolt in Idlib now favours often isn’t welcome.
Really there are two sieges in Aleppo in place. One side’s offensive has air power the other human ordinance. You could consider Idlib and Aleppo as one strategic area. This counter siege came in from the Northern countryside supplied via Turkey.