Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

America going soft on capital punishment

Single punch killers quite often get charged with murder and convicted of the lesser charge of manslaughter. Often hangs on whether the defendant bubbles himself up to OB. Always have a brief and always say nothing.
In this case there was extremely solid evidence he not only stayed quiet but did loads of work to try to cover up what he'd done- so was convicted of manslaughter and perverting the course of justice.
This is the case. Happened right outside my window and i went to the final day at old bailey. Feels really strange bringing it up again but why he wasn't convicted of murder i don't know.
Man found guilty of manslaughter after crushing teen with car
 
yep. At the time I just felt glad they got the right person but i don't get why this wasn't murder.
Without the facts its difficult to say but i suspect he said he just wanted to chase him and catch him and in no way run him over or hurt him (with the car). So his defence would have been chasing somebody in a car isnt a "virtual certainty" that serious injury or death is likely to happen..unlike Darren Osbourne who intended to run people over.
 
In this case there was extremely solid evidence he not only stayed quiet but did loads of work to try to cover up what he'd done- so was convicted of manslaughter and perverting the course of justice.
This is the case. Happened right outside my window and i went to the final day at old bailey. Feels really strange bringing it up again but why he wasn't convicted of murder i don't know.
Man found guilty of manslaughter after crushing teen with car

Awful. See the driving standard thread in transport for an idea why he got manslaughter not murder, crimes committed with cars seem to cause juries to err on the lenient side of things.

In this case it looks like the killer was some senior gang member enforcing 'discipline', (possibly over drugs?) and the sentence he received was 18 years, 12 of which must be served in prison, so not that far off the lower end of minimum recs for a knife killing (albeit one not related to gangs/drugs, that shit ups the minimum rec).

Sorry you had to endure any part of that :(
 
Last edited:
thanks Bahnhof Strasse. I didn't know he got 18 years. At the time I thought I didn't really care what punishment was meted out as long as they got the right person but find that i do care now. It was horrific, and to know that several local businesses were involved in helping get the dents out of the car put new wheels etc in the middle of the night.
 
You can be charged and convicted of manslaughter without being tried for murder. Example of the top of my head was the ferry disaster where the captain went too close to shore, then abandoned ship (Costa Concordia)..harsh giving him nearly 20 years for an accident, but we live in an age of retribution and revenge, not compassion, understanding and empathy.

He may not have intended to strand the ship or hurt anyone, but his negligence (and subsequent reaction) made him culpable. He deserved that sentence in my view.
 
He may not have intended to strand the ship or hurt anyone, but his negligence (and subsequent reaction) made him culpable. He deserved that sentence in my view.
He shouldnt have got off the ship, the captain should be last, but the damage was allready done. It was something the ship often did, sail close to shore to do a "sail by", waving at people on the cliffs. We have a ship does it once a year near us, it gets pretty close to some trecherous reefs/rocks, lots of old ship wrecks there too. What sentence do you think would be appropriate if he hadnt have left the ship?
 
He shouldnt have got off the ship, the captain should be last, but the damage was allready done. It was something the ship often did, sail close to shore to do a "sail by", waving at people on the cliffs. We have a ship does it once a year near us, it gets pretty close to some trecherous reefs/rocks, lots of old ship wrecks there too. What sentence do you think would be appropriate if he hadnt have left the ship?
don't think one would have been necessary
 
He shouldnt have got off the ship, the captain should be last, but the damage was allready done. It was something the ship often did, sail close to shore to do a "sail by", waving at people on the cliffs. We have a ship does it once a year near us, it gets pretty close to some trecherous reefs/rocks, lots of old ship wrecks there too. What sentence do you think would be appropriate if he hadnt have left the ship?

The incident happened at night. Who the fuck were they waving to? It was negligence on the captain's part and his subsequent reaction compounded his fault.
 
One what?
a sentence

captain-sinking-ship.jpg
 
The incident happened at night. Who the fuck were they waving to? It was negligence on the captain's part and his subsequent reaction compounded his fault.
People on the cliff tops, like to see the ships close up,even at night with all the lights on they do it all the time..he got "too close" this time, a genuine accident. Hes got more time than some child rapists and other scum, i have a problem with over punishing "good people" for negligence.
 
People on the cliff tops, like to see the ships close up,even at night with all the lights on they do it all the time..he got "too close" this time, a genuine accident. Hes got more time than some child rapists and other scum, i have a problem with over punishing "good people" for negligence.

Guiding a ship full of passengers close to a known reef at night for non-essential purposes is the very definition of negligent. That they got with it before is no excuse. He was supposed to be the captain of a ship, not a joy-riding youngster.
 
Guiding a ship full of passengers close to a known reef at night for non-essential purposes is the very definition of negligent. That they got with it before is no excuse. He was supposed to be the captain of a ship, not a jojy-riding youngster.
Many ships do it, its allowed. We used to have the QE2 come by close to us, in our very dangerous waters and it got damn close. Im not saying its ok, just that it is more common than you think.
 
Many ships do it, its allowed. We used to have the QE2 come by close to us, in our very dangerous waters and it got damn close. Im not saying its ok, just that it is more common than you think.

It's only "allowed" when nobody comes to harm and nobody complains. I doubt there's a specific regulation that allows ships to make risky, non-essential maneuvers for the entertainment of people onshore.
 
I think the concordia, was as close as was allowed but got swept in by bad weather. Yes there was certainly negligence in not recognising the dangers that the weather posed at that time and the consequences were catastrophic.
 
People on the cliff tops, like to see the ships close up,even at night with all the lights on they do it all the time..he got "too close" this time, a genuine accident. Hes got more time than some child rapists and other scum, i have a problem with over punishing "good people" for negligence.

His show-boating killed thirty two people.
 
I think the concordia, was as close as was allowed but got swept in by bad weather. Yes there was certainly negligence in not recognising the dangers that the weather posed at that time and the consequences were catastrophic.

He was the Captain of a fucking commercial vessel, not some idiot noob helming a dinky little yacht. That he didn't desist from making that fateful maneuver in spite of being aware of the poor weather conditions makes it worse, not better.
 
Ian Huntley also has to live with his actions for the rest of his life. What has the fact that you live with your actions got to do with anything?
Are you really comparing huntley with the captain of this ship? Im pretty sure huntley couldnt give a shit about his victims.
 
Are you really comparing huntley with the captain of this ship? Im pretty sure huntley couldnt give a shit about his victims.

No, Huntley killed 16th of the number this prick did.

And his 'fell in to a lifeboat' bullshit demonstrates about as much of a shit as Huntley gave to Jessica Chapman & Holly Wells.

Just cos he didn't set out to do it, doesn't absolve him of culpability for the deaths, hence why he's inside for 20 16 years.
 
Last edited:
No, Huntley killed 16th of the number this prick did.

And his 'fell in to a lifeboat' bullshit demonstrates about as much of a shit as Huntley gave to Jessica Chapman & Holly Wells.
I expect the captain was in a state of shock too hes only human, unlike huntley, who carefully pre meditated those vile crimes.
 
Back
Top Bottom