I couldn't even get past para 3. Reads like something you'd expect if you accidentallied got chugged by a SWPer selling papers.http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/28/post-woolwich-assault-racism-not-just-edl
Workerism? Hermeneutics? Techniques of racialisation? Ideational content?
Really?
The Morning Star is looking for a subeditor! lauriepenny could do this, AND bang out a shit opinion piece for the NS once a week on the train. Boom. No more whining about being enmeshed in a world of povs. You're welcome.
http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/news/content/view/full/446#morstar1
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/28/post-woolwich-assault-racism-not-just-edl
Workerism? Hermeneutics? Techniques of racialisation? Ideational content?
Really?
I couldn't even get past para 3. Reads like something you'd expect if you accidentallied got chugged by a SWPer selling papers.
And replacing lots of words with Gaelic.Some academics seem to end up imitating the writing style of people who they spend their time reading which imo is hilarious. It's a bit like little kids from the south visiting their grandparents in Scotland for a few weeks and coming back home with a Scottish accent..
And replacing lots of words with Gaelic.
Mensch's attack on privilege theory made the Graunid http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/30/reality-based-feminism-louise-mensch
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/28/post-woolwich-assault-racism-not-just-edl
Workerism? Hermeneutics? Techniques of racialisation? Ideational content?
Really?
Which bits do you agree/disagree with?I don't think I've ever read an article where I've disagreed so vehemently with most of it while agreeing so much with another bit of it. It's almost like Mensch is utterly confused.
Idiots like Hodges and Mensch are doing a fine job of discrediting anyone who has issues with privilege checking & intersectionality.
Oh god - lauriepenny is on 10 O Clock News tonight - debating with Christine Hamilton. The kind of TV that makes you want to poke your own eyeballs out
I saw this in the early hours on 4/7. It was a bit meh, with the only decent point being made by Christine Hamilton (bloody hell) that it was fairly much ok for middle class women now, and if anything needed to be done by feminists it was best to concentrate on women whose lives were generally harder. It wasn't really a proper discussion and all three ended up looking a bit divorced from reality.
Well, yeah Throw David Mitchell's piss-taking posh attempts to control the conversation into the mix, and it was more of a point and laugh session than anything else Which was probably the intention.
Angela Epstein was one of the three women btwSounds like the opening line of a joke:
Laurie Penny, Christine Hamilton and David Mitchell walk into a TV studio...
Write your own punchline
Angela Epstein was one of the three women btw
She's another journo/commentariat. Her take on being a woman (and by extension, stance on feminism) is an updated version of those 50s adverts about how to keep a man happy.Who's Angela Epstein? (I know about google, but...)
She's another journo/commentariat. Her take on being a woman (and by extension, stance on feminism) is an updated version of those 50s adverts about how to keep a man happy.
Which bits do you agree/disagree with?
I want to talk about the way that most of the modern feminist movement, at least online, appears to be wasting most of its time in frenzied internal debate about absolutely nothing, and in the process, solving absolutely nothing. It has come to be alien to the vast majority of women, who do not self-identify as feminists, and yet who, if asked, would support feminist goals.
Well, AE was doing "feminism is dead and feminists don't do themselves any favours, and this is what men want" on stage left. CH was centre stage doing "why I didn't go into politics, me me me, politics is not an arena women feel happy in, every woman should vote cos of suffragettes, but yeah feminism should be directed where it's needed at the working class that I heard of once". LP was stage right doing "OMG I can't believe you said that, no let me finish, CAPITALIST PATRIARCHY, and feminism is more important to every women in the world EVER" with accompanying stutters and speaking with hands. David Mitchell using it as opportunity for pisstake. All that was lacking was for Greer to enter stage right and take all 4 out with a 12bore before turning it on herself.I'm probably not regretting that I missed that then.Did Laurie have anything of interest to say, or did they just swap tea-making tips?
Well, AE was doing "feminism is dead and feminists don't do themselves any favours, and this is what men want" on stage left. CH was centre stage doing "why I didn't go into politics, me me me, politics is not an arena women feel happy in, every woman should vote cos of suffragettes, but yeah feminism should be directed where it's needed at the working class that I heard of once". LP was stage right doing "OMG I can't believe you said that, no let me finish, CAPITALIST PATRIARCHY, and feminism is more important to every women in the world EVER" with accompanying stutters and speaking with hands. David Mitchell using it as opportunity for pisstake. All that was lacking was for Greer to enter stage right and take all 4 out with a 12bore before turning it on herself.
Well, it's meant to be a satirical view of events so the satire involves those taking part too, I guess. Massive home goal if you were doing anything other than getting airtime and advertising yourself.Reading your description I'm glad I don't have a TV.
Far more rewarding discussions to be had here
I couldn't even get past para 3. Reads like something you'd expect if you accidentallied got chugged by a SWPer selling papers.