English is my second language, thus foreign verbosity or whatnot - and no one wins any bets about Oxford and P&P (whatever that is). Anyway - fair point with the thread not all being about the ressentiment-thing, it just seemed strange to me that no one had pointed out such an obvious streak to this whole conversation. I did have a lot of fun reading through this stuff (though I did not read all of it, or even most), and there are many interesting points that I do agree with. It just seems unfair to lay all of it on Laurie Pennys doorstep - what is she supposed to do with the middle-class-oxbridge-stuff? Constantly apologize? Shut up? Someone made the same point in this tread about Lena Dunham - why is she to bear the responsibility for something that only makes sense as a problem on a systemic level?
And it's not pop psychology - it's pop philosophy - so much more fun.
And it's not pop psychology - it's pop philosophy - so much more fun.