Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Alex Callinicos/SWP vs Laurie Penny/New Statesman Facebook handbags

Status
Not open for further replies.
By her own admission (and talent) she only got 'x' amount of donations because she happened to have friends on Twitter with a sphere of influence. There is nothing radical. She simply used an existing system of power to satisfy her artistic demands. There's nothing really to salute here. Maybe she does have some interesting ideas about Occupy and the current political climate. I haven't seen anything yet. I'm happy to be proved wrong.

I expect her answer would be something in terms of letting her produced 'art' magnify what's already there - that she's not a theorist just giving some emotional punch - not satisfactory answers.

Owen Jones is however completely set on turning something like UK Uncut (that has similar problems as Occupy in UK) wholly straight into middle-class Labour or a pressure group.

I am giving MC the benefit of the doubt, if you like, because of the absence of open political statements now.
 
I expect her answer would be something in terms of letting her produced 'art' magnify what's already there - that she's not a theorist just giving some emotional punch - not satisfactory answers.

Owen Jones is however completely set on turning something like UK Uncut (that has similar problems as Occupy in UK) wholly straight into middle-class Labour or a pressure group.

I am giving MC the benefit of the doubt, if you like, because of the absence of open political statements now.

I'm prepared to give her a chance also. At least she's no Eoin Clarke either, trying to hijack the bedroom tax protests for his own Labour Left.
 
One of you is Molly
Honestly, I had never heard of Crabapple until of her association with Penny or this thread. I maintain my criticisms of her. However, if she wants to prove me wrong, that's fine.

There is already a multitude of upper-middle class individuals happy to cash-in on working class struggles, protest and movements.

I'm happy to ignore this vapid art bubble created by Crabapple.
 
I'm not. Take dead aim on the rich boys. Get them in the crosshairs and take them down

Actually I'm with you now after skimming for her politics to find this lunacy:

The Communist Party considered easel paintings, as opposed to murals, bourgeois, because they could only have one owner.

I am not much of a fan of Kara Walker - praised by the US art establishment, but MC thinks she is part of the top 2 of current artists:

I want to give particular mention to two artists who, because of their scale and their social conscience, I see as the heirs to Diego Rivera. Kara Walker is an African American artist who does classic, black-paper silhouettes on a massive scale. Her intricate shadows offer treacherously beautiful looks at slavery’s horrors. SWOON is a New York street artist. She makes giant, graceful woodblock prints of average people, and then risks arrest as she wheat-pastes them in public spaces around the world.

likes reclaiming the n-word as in her pieces

61Cv4qJZaHL._SL500_SS500_.jpg


which plays around with racialist depictions of US blacks:

Kara+Walker+7.jpg
 
it will be a tedious blend of all the mediocre, critique by numbers, left stuff that has come out so far, with a few added swear words, couple of mentions of vaginas, couple of made up stories, the usual self referential stuff about laurie herself (and possibly her vagina), the quote about blair, some cringe inducing stuff about miners and 'the north' and probably at least 500 words or so of introspective stuff about how angry she is which explains why it's taken this long for her to write something about it (nothing to do with the fact of course that she didn't have the guts, insight, connection or ability to actually pen something sooner without first reading everything that's been written so far and lifting from that)
 
it's not up yet. but there is a column advertised as "What's The Point Of An Opinion Columnist These Days?", which i kind of hoped would simply be a link to this thread, but actually she says:

"To be a columnist today is no longer to stand on a stage alone, reciting marvellous soliloquies while a paying audience waits to applaud. Apart from anything else, few publications can now afford to fork out the kinds of salaries that make principled writers lose perspective. Being a columnist today is more like being a street performer – collecting coins in a battered suitcase, telling stories about a better world and understanding that the audience might change the story."

fucksake.
 
Btw, Laurie, if you're reading this, this is how it's done:

Richard Nixon is gone now, and I am poorer for it. He was the real thing -- a political monster straight out of Grendel and a very dangerous enemy. He could shake your hand and stab you in the back at the same time. He lied to his friends and betrayed the trust of his family. Not even Gerald Ford, the unhappy ex-president who pardoned Nixon and kept him out of prison, was immune to the evil fallout. Ford, who believes strongly in Heaven and Hell, has told more than one of his celebrity golf partners that "I know I will go to hell, because I pardoned Richard Nixon."
I have had my own bloody relationship with Nixon for many years, but I am not worried about it landing me in hell with him. I have already been there with that bastard, and I am a better person for it. Nixon had the unique ability to make his enemies seem honorable, and we developed a keen sense of fraternity. Some of my best friends have hated Nixon all their lives. My mother hates Nixon, my son hates Nixon, I hate Nixon, and this hatred has brought us together.
Nixon laughed when I told him this. "Don't worry," he said, "I, too, am a family man, and we feel the same way about you."
It was Richard Nixon who got me into politics, and now that he's gone, I feel lonely. He was a giant in his way. As long as Nixon was politically alive -- and he was, all the way to the end -- we could always be sure of finding the enemy on the Low Road. There was no need to look anywhere else for the evil bastard. He had the fighting instincts of a badger trapped by hounds. The badger will roll over on its back and emit a smell of death, which confuses the dogs and lures them in for the traditional ripping and tearing action. But it is usually the badger who does the ripping and tearing. It is a beast that fights best on its back: rolling under the throat of the enemy and seizing it by the head with all four claws.
That was Nixon's style -- and if you forgot, he would kill you as a lesson to the others. Badgers don't fight fair, bubba. That's why God made dachshunds.
Nixon was a navy man, and he should have been buried at sea. Many of his friends were seagoing people: Bebe Rebozo, Robert Vesco, William F. Buckley Jr., and some of them wanted a full naval burial.
These come in at least two styles, however, and Nixon's immediate family strongly opposed both of them. In the traditionalist style, the dead president's body would be wrapped and sewn loosely in canvas sailcloth and dumped off the stern of a frigate at least 100 miles off the coast and at least 1,000 miles south of San Diego, so the corpse could never wash up on American soil in any recognizable form.

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/07/he-was-a-crook/308699/

If the right people had been in charge of Nixon's funeral, his casket would have been launched into one of those open-sewage canals that empty into the ocean just south of Los Angeles. He was a swine of a man and a jabbering dupe of a president. Nixon was so crooked that he needed servants to help him screw his pants on every morning. Even his funeral was illegal. He was queer in the deepest way. His body should have been burned in a trash bin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom