Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

A thank you to Brexiteers.

Indeed.


Jesus, not those links again, the last time you posted them, you had plenty of replies pointing out that much of what they claim was cobblers, yet you ignored those reasoned replies, and now you inject those same links again. :facepalm:
 
The vaccines success is despite the government, not because of it.
It's always tempting to think that, especially with a Tory government. However, it's not true both the UK and USA went in very quickly with contracts for vaccines. Unfortunately, the EU didn't. Don't get me wrong I'm against the first come first served principle, I reject totally the idea of a patent for the private sector on vaccine production and think that a purely private sector driven vaccine production is inefficient, promises a lot but under delivers. However in the world that we live in the UK government despite being Tories got it right. for the UK. Buy early, buy big and get it distributed asap.
 

Thanks; not quite what I’d hoped unfortunately; the clinical trials all involved 2 dosing, so although there were no serious illnesses t+22 days, there wasn’t much of a window to examine single dose protection before the 2nd doses were given.

The AZ jab was originally intended to be a single dose (like the J&J) so it would be interesting if they’d found it would have/does in fact work like that. The eventual 2 dose regime was settled on as a bit of belt and braces because they weren’t seeing strong ‘enough’ immune responses in all participants (I think - memory is fuzzy); NB measured immune response is not the same as protection level.
 
Read it properly. The headline's a pretty hefty hint.

The 76% is against contracting the virus at all. The 100% is against hospitalisation/death.
It's improved from the earlier UK study then:

Serious adverse events were observed among 79 participants in the vaccine group and 89 participants in the control group. Serious events determined to be possibly related with ChAdOx1 included hemolytic anemia, transverse myelitis, and fever over 40°C.
 
Thanks; not quite what I’d hoped unfortunately; the clinical trials all involved 2 dosing, so although there were no serious illnesses t+22 days, there wasn’t much of a window to examine single dose protection before the 2nd doses were given.

The AZ jab was originally intended to be a single dose (like the J&J) so it would be interesting if they’d found it would have/does in fact work like that. The eventual 2 dose regime was settled on as a bit of belt and braces because they weren’t seeing strong ‘enough’ immune responses in all participants (I think - memory is fuzzy); NB measured immune response is not the same as protection level.
Yes, you're right. Unknown long term regarding the 2nd dose but it still makes perfect sense to get as many first doses done as quickly as possible. The comments on The Lancet piece also point out some of the vagaries of the trials.
 
It's always tempting to think that, especially with a Tory government. However, it's not true both the UK and USA went in very quickly with contracts for vaccines. Unfortunately, the EU didn't. Don't get me wrong I'm against the first come first served principle, I reject totally the idea of a patent for the private sector on vaccine production and think that a purely private sector driven vaccine production is inefficient, promises a lot but under delivers. However in the world that we live in the UK government despite being Tories got it right. for the UK. Buy early, buy big and get it distributed asap.
They will still get no credit from me. Just because they finally did the right thing doesn't excuse the multitude of fuckups that resulted in so many needless deaths.
 
Is there a remix of Politically Unmoored or Tin Foil Army yet ?

No, the original did fairly well for a few years, but then it dawned on people that the promotors were a bunch of massive twats - I think there's a few diehard followers about, but they don't have the skill required to produce a remix.
 
Jesus, not those links again, the last time you posted them, you had plenty of replies pointing out that much of what they claim was cobblers, yet you ignored those reasoned replies, and now you inject those same links again. :facepalm:
The government took a gamble with the vaccines and got lucky. It has very little to Brexit no matter how much you want it to be true.
 
Cobblers, now go back & read the replies you got the last time you posted those links, back on page 3.

Treat them as standing orders, read them & understand them!
I know Brexit fans are desperate to claim any kind of success from this ongoing, disastrous clusterfuck - even if that includes things that weren't even mentioned or thought of at the time of the referendum - but I'm happy with the links I posted up, thanks.
 
I know Brexit fans are desperate to claim any kind of success from this ongoing, disastrous clusterfuck - even if that includes things that weren't even mentioned or thought of at the time of the referendum - but I'm happy with the links I posted up, thanks.

Translation - I'm happy to conflate vaccine procurement and regulatory approval as it fits my agenda, and to totally ignore any reasoned arguments, because they don't.

Jolly good, have a peanut.
 
Translation - I'm happy to conflate vaccine procurement and regulatory approval as it fits my agenda, and to totally ignore any reasoned arguments, because they don't.

Jolly good, have a peanut.
Keep on spinning, chum.

Oh, and I'll ask you the same question: Putting the vaccination issue to one side, tell me all the positive things that have come out of Brexit so far.
 
And let’s not put the vaccine issue aside, you keep claiming it isn’t Brexit related and keep trying to back that claim up by conflating it with vaccine approvals, yet my friend Varnia still can not see her mum cos the over 80’s in Portugal are still waiting for a jab, but I will have mine on Monday, aged 48. My step-mum’s aunt is still dead cos she lived in Holland and not the U.K.
 
Back
Top Bottom