Not until I reach the other sideI've a feeling that might not happen
That's not what it says:Dozens of articles if you Google 'AstraZeneca 100%' but start here COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca confirms 100% protection against severe disease, hospitalisation and death in the primary analysis of Phase III trials
Results demonstrated vaccine efficacy of 76% (CI: 59% to 86%) after a first dose,
it's rather more than that, 148,125 with c19 on the death certIt must be of great comfort to the families of the 130k people who have died that the government has finally put on its big boy pants and decided to listen to the experts.
I was being conservative.it's rather more than that, 148,125 with c19 on the death cert
The vaccines success is despite the government, not because of it.
Read it properly. The headline's a pretty hefty hint.That's not what it says:
Indeed.
Vaccine approval isn’t quicker because of Brexit - Full Fact
The MHRA could have given the Pfizer vaccine the same emergency approval when the UK was in the EU.fullfact.orgWhy the EU’s vaccine disaster doesn’t prove Brexit was right
The UK’s vaccine success does not compensate for its catastrophic handling of the pandemic or the cost of leaving the EU.www.newstatesman.comUK vaccine approval: Did Brexit speed up the process?
There have been claims that Brexit allowed the UK to approve a vaccine quicker than the EU, but is that correct?www.bbc.co.uk
Jesus, not those links again, the last time you posted them, you had plenty of replies pointing out that much of what they claim was cobblers, yet you ignored those reasoned replies, and now you inject those links again.
It's always tempting to think that, especially with a Tory government. However, it's not true both the UK and USA went in very quickly with contracts for vaccines. Unfortunately, the EU didn't. Don't get me wrong I'm against the first come first served principle, I reject totally the idea of a patent for the private sector on vaccine production and think that a purely private sector driven vaccine production is inefficient, promises a lot but under delivers. However in the world that we live in the UK government despite being Tories got it right. for the UK. Buy early, buy big and get it distributed asap.The vaccines success is despite the government, not because of it.
Dozens of articles if you Google 'AstraZeneca 100%' but start here COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca confirms 100% protection against severe disease, hospitalisation and death in the primary analysis of Phase III trials
Is there a remix of Politically Unmoored or Tin Foil Army yet ?Oh good this again it’s one of the best songs on the album.
It's improved from the earlier UK study then:Read it properly. The headline's a pretty hefty hint.
The 76% is against contracting the virus at all. The 100% is against hospitalisation/death.
Serious adverse events were observed among 79 participants in the vaccine group and 89 participants in the control group. Serious events determined to be possibly related with ChAdOx1 included hemolytic anemia, transverse myelitis, and fever over 40°C.
Yes, you're right. Unknown long term regarding the 2nd dose but it still makes perfect sense to get as many first doses done as quickly as possible. The comments on The Lancet piece also point out some of the vagaries of the trials.Thanks; not quite what I’d hoped unfortunately; the clinical trials all involved 2 dosing, so although there were no serious illnesses t+22 days, there wasn’t much of a window to examine single dose protection before the 2nd doses were given.
The AZ jab was originally intended to be a single dose (like the J&J) so it would be interesting if they’d found it would have/does in fact work like that. The eventual 2 dose regime was settled on as a bit of belt and braces because they weren’t seeing strong ‘enough’ immune responses in all participants (I think - memory is fuzzy); NB measured immune response is not the same as protection level.
They will still get no credit from me. Just because they finally did the right thing doesn't excuse the multitude of fuckups that resulted in so many needless deaths.It's always tempting to think that, especially with a Tory government. However, it's not true both the UK and USA went in very quickly with contracts for vaccines. Unfortunately, the EU didn't. Don't get me wrong I'm against the first come first served principle, I reject totally the idea of a patent for the private sector on vaccine production and think that a purely private sector driven vaccine production is inefficient, promises a lot but under delivers. However in the world that we live in the UK government despite being Tories got it right. for the UK. Buy early, buy big and get it distributed asap.
It's improved from the earlier UK study then
Is there a remix of Politically Unmoored or Tin Foil Army yet ?
The government took a gamble with the vaccines and got lucky. It has very little to Brexit no matter how much you want it to be true.Jesus, not those links again, the last time you posted them, you had plenty of replies pointing out that much of what they claim was cobblers, yet you ignored those reasoned replies, and now you inject those same links again.
The government took a gamble with the vaccines and got lucky. It has very little to Brexit no mayter how much you want it to be true.
I know Brexit fans are desperate to claim any kind of success from this ongoing, disastrous clusterfuck - even if that includes things that weren't even mentioned or thought of at the time of the referendum - but I'm happy with the links I posted up, thanks.Cobblers, now go back & read the replies you got the last time you posted those links, back on page 3.
Treat them as standing orders, read them & understand them!
I'm not convinced this was down to chance; I'm prepared to accept that our venal, corrupt, esurient 'leaders' are actually better suited to neoliberal gaming than the EU bureaucrats.The government took a gamble with the vaccines and got lucky. It has very little to Brexit no matter how much you want it to be true.
The government took a gamble with the vaccines and got lucky. It has very little to Brexit no matter how much you want it to be true.
any positive outcome would have happened anyway, any negative thing is Brexit's fault.
Putting the vaccination issue to one side, tell me all the positive things that have come out of Brexit so far. Thanks.
I know Brexit fans are desperate to claim any kind of success from this ongoing, disastrous clusterfuck - even if that includes things that weren't even mentioned or thought of at the time of the referendum - but I'm happy with the links I posted up, thanks.
Putting the vaccination issue to one side, tell me all the positive things that have come out of Brexit so far. Thanks.
Keep on spinning, chum.Translation - I'm happy to conflate vaccine procurement and regulatory approval as it fits my agenda, and to totally ignore any reasoned arguments, because they don't.
Jolly good, have a peanut.
Patel can't off-load "illegal" asylum seekers to other EU countries through which they've passed as the UK is no longer part of the Dublin agreement.Keep on spinning, chum.
Oh, and I'll ask you the same question: Putting the vaccination issue to one side, tell me all the positive things that have come out of Brexit so far.
It's certainly led to some friendly and good humoured discussions between people with different opinions here, hasn't it...Keep on spinning, chum.
Oh, and I'll ask you the same question: Putting the vaccination issue to one side, tell me all the positive things that have come out of Brexit so far.