revol68
what, fucking what?
You can call it what you like.
My point is terms like uncle tom and coconut are racialised. They draw on historical associations and expectations of what it means to be Black, how black people should behave, who they should or should not align themselves with etc and on what basis. To see them used here and justified for me completely ignores the importance/impact of institutionalised and internalised racism. It suggests to me the person using them does not have a deep understanding of the impact of internalised racism and a reaction to racism. It reinforces historical notions of inherent cultural similarities and ignores the fact that class hierarches and the perception of those things has always existed. Equally that different people's identities are not simply formulated on account of them sharing a shade of skin or shared experiences of racism/oppression they never have been. Black and Asian people are in this way as diverse and complex as everyone else, the expectation that they are not and therefore should only draw allegiances along 'race' lines for me reinforces racism and classism, 'racialised classism' in fact.
No amount of quoting Malcom X at me changes that view by the way. He had his journey, his words you quote were in context, I am sure I can find you a quote of his to support my position too.
I have never denied they are racialised, what I merely did was try to give my reasoning as to why I felt Uncle Tom is generally less problematic than something like Coconut. That reasoning being that Uncle Tom essentially equates to a slave equivalent of "scab", someone who joins in on the oppression of "their own", who sides with the oppressor. Coconut on the other hand is simply a racialised concept of what people should behave like in a much wider cultural sense.
I haven't in any way tried to justify them being used in the manner you suggest, I have simply gave reasons why Uncle Tom is a less racist term, by looking at where it came from and even it's contemporary use where it is more often related to a critique of those with power. Having said that I also stated that I do think it problematic for exactly the reasons you've just laid out.
I'm not quoting Malcolm X at you, I am simply pointing out that terms like Uncle Tom and House Nigger have an origin in black people fighting back against racism despite the issues that arise from them and indeed the black power movements in general.
Equally that different people's identities are not simply formulated on account of them sharing a shade of skin or shared experiences of racism/oppression they never have been.
Again I agree with that but on the otherhand you can't disregard the oppositional identities that do come out of that, that do base themselves around a shared experience of racism or discrimination, and the subsequent contempt these movements will have for those that they deem to have betrayed that shared experience by alligning with the oppressor.
Basically to label the term Uncle Tom racist would involve labeling the likes of the Black Panthers or Revolutionary League of Black workers racist too and that for me is too close to a liberal notion of it being about "attitudes" divorced from history and power dynamics.
Anyway I think we are talking largely at cross purposes cos I've never intended to defend any idiot on here using Uncle Tom as an insult for Mehdi Hasan, or for that matter to attack any other poster on here for not acting in a correct manner. Personally, I've been called a castle catholic and tame taig on urban for not supporting Irish republicanism so I'm quite alert to that kind of bullshit and have absolutely no intention of defending that kind of logic.