Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

9/11 military tapes released - Pentagon lied to the 9/11 commission

Status
Not open for further replies.
WouldBe said:
The ADS function is uni-directional not bi-directional
Click to expand...
Really? :eek: Then why the fuck did you say:

WouldBe said:
Wouldbe holds his hands up and admits he's made a mistake. After all it has been a few years since I was in the Avionics field. So to Backatcha Bandit I apologise BUT only in part.

I have done a search, on the rockwell collins site for the system that BB tried to link to that doesn't work for me and I found this.
VHF radio
The Collins VHF-4000( ) provides high-speed data communications
Click to expand...
It would seem that aircraft radio CAN transmit and receive data


I did a bit more digging and found CMU-4000 that allows higher speed data comms, can interface with the HF, VHF and satellite radio systems and can interface with other avionics on the 757.
Click to expand...
http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1671895&postcount=200

Wanna carry on, or would you prefer your pet bitch-weasle Loki to do your wriggling for you? :D

I take it your 'failing memory' should be added to the list of reasons that we should believe everything you say? :rolleyes:
 
Backatcha Bandit said:
Really? :eek: Then why the fuck did you say:

http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1671895&postcount=200

Wanna carry on, or would you prefer your pet bitch-weasle Loki to do your wriggling for you? :D

I take it your 'failing memory' should be added to the list of reasons that we should believe everything you say? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Perhaps you should re-read the information posted.

The ADS system is 1-way, aircraft to ground so the carrier can keep track of their aircraft.

The VHF radio system, through which the ADS communicates, is a 2-way system. This does not mean that you can force signals back through a 1-way input and somehow magically control the aircraft. That's as stupid as saying that upgrading the software in your Hi-fi system you can convert it into a radio station.

And you call me a clown. :D
 
Backatcha Bandit said:
Wanna carry on, or would you prefer your pet bitch-weasle Loki to do your wriggling for you? :D
Click to expand...

Here you go clown. http://www.rockwellcollins.com/ecat/at/FCS-700A.html?smenu=105
The FCS-700A is a development of the FCS-700 autopilot flight director system (currently provided as standard equipment on all versions of the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft)
Click to expand...

So that would include the aircraft involved in 9/11

The FCS-700A is a fully digital, fail operational autopilot flight director system. The system, part of the Boeing 747-400 flight control system, performs tasks associated with flight director commands, speed selection, altitude selection, heading selection, autopilot, autoland, and system fault isolation. Utilizing the new FCC-703, system upgrades are much easier and less expensive due to the incorporation of dataload capability via either front connector or rear connector.
Click to expand...

So NOT upgradeable via radio.

Notice the requirement for a MCP as well to be able to input flight data into the FCS. So doesn't look like the flight plan can be updated by radio either.
 
Also, autopilot on a commercial airliner is probably (expert help here please?) not accurate enough to hit a skyscraper.
 
So Backatcha what exactly are your credentials that make you such a reliable expert?

My memory isn't that bad that I've forgotten the chat we had by PM many moons ago. ;)
 
Crispy said:
Also, autopilot on a commercial airliner is probably (expert help here please?) not accurate enough to hit a skyscraper.
Click to expand...

Sorry that was covered ages ago in a threasd that BB has dragged back up.

Autopilot is capable of taking an aircraft off, flying to it's destination and landing on the runway without pilot intervention.

The runway for a 757 only needs to be 96ft ish wide the WTC was 208ft wide. Autopilot could easily hit the WTC.

BUT if autopilot was being used why did the second aircraft nearly miss the WTC? and why did the first aircraft head north off it's flight path instead of south?
 
The FBI are holding your birthday thread and won't release it.

What are they covering up?
That you're actually a 10,000 year old lizard king?
That you are a time traveller and are actually -245 years old?

We demand to know the truth!
 
squeegee said:
State terrorism and government control of the people. It's sooooo boring :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
squeegee whining on and on and on with his dull, fact-free mumblings.

Now *that's* boring!
 
editor said:
squeegee whining on and on and on with his dull, fact-free mumblings.

Now *that's* boring!
Click to expand...

Hard to see the facts when you edit them out, contravening your own clearly stated rule. That's ok. The truth can be a bit boring I know.

Are you saying the petition doesn't list FACTS?

Is it not a fact that the tapes in air traffic control were destroyed, or witnesses have been prevented from testifying at the 911 commission?
 
squeegee said:
Hard to see the facts when you edit them out, contravening your own clearly stated rule.
Click to expand...
I'm getting fed up with your endless lies.

What facts have I edited out please? What rules have I contravened?

You, of course, have regularly broken the FAQ, yet you're still here, but my patience is running out now.
 
Why do you always ask questions that have clearly been stated in previous posts. Why do you wilfully act so ignorant. Even Bob the Lost agreed that my editing was sound, and he's hardly in the squeegee appreciation club.

The petition represents FACTS about the witholding and destroying of evidence as well as evidence that the public have been misled, so why are you acting like they are not facts?

You have not addressed the questions and statements leading to the questions, and the reason I believe is because to do so would mean agreeing with me, and you would do ANYTHING rather than agree with me.

How very representative this is of your debating style (or lack of it) and your general manner. You have not once displayed the slightest magnanimity (look it up in the dictionary thicko computer nerd) or willingness to build bridges.

So you wanna ban me, then ban me. And as for the FAQs that you contravene everyday with your abusive language, it shows you up to be a hypocrite as well.

You just can't take it, can you. Boxed into a corner and now all you can do is make up lies and excuses so you don't have to face being shown up again and again.

Fuck you and goodnight...cunt :mad:
 
squeegee said:
Fuck you and goodnight...cunt :mad:
Click to expand...
Byeeeee!

belangi1.jpg


See you in two weeks!
 
That's funny, I remember being called a cunt on a serial basis by pk, and editor told me to stop reporting it. :rolleyes:

mind you, things have improved since then I guess.
 
Jazzz said:
That's funny, I remember being called a cunt on a serial basis by pk, and editor told me to stop reporting it.
Click to expand...
It's all about context and recent history, sunny jim.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

C
If the US govt organised 9/11 in order to justify a war in Afghanistran...
Replies
12
Views
37K
Citizen66
C
Dillinger4
'9/11 Truth Movement' and Academia
14 15 16 17 18
Replies
537
Views
30K
kyser_soze
K
friedaweed
  • Poll
So 9-11. Who really did it?
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
Crispy
Crispy
DrRingDing
  • Locked
Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job
15 16 17 18 19
Replies
543
Views
34K
FridgeMagnet
FridgeMagnet
M
9/11 a conspiracy?
4 5 6 7 8
Replies
221
Views
13K
Jazzz
Jazzz
Back
Top Bottom