articul8
Dishonest sociopath
another one for pedants corner.All edits are retrospective. Think before you type.
another one for pedants corner.All edits are retrospective. Think before you type.
pedants'another one for pedants corner.
No - I would work with them on community campaigns - at a non-electoral level. But would still call for a Labour vote if they decided stand at a GE.You would do something and continue to do something that you think is a tactical mistake?
Or the tactical mistake would you supporting a non-labour party candidate in a general election? Why, how many divisions do you have?
why do you think they should support labour? what's in it for them?No - I would work with them on community campaigns - at a non-electoral level. But would still call for a Labour vote if they decided stand at a GE.
No - I would work with them on community campaigns - at a non-electoral level. But would still call for a Labour vote if they decided stand at a GE.
he is a member of the labour party after allSo you would support a member of Progress over an actual socialist?
thankfully that isn't the case. if it were I'd understand the logic of standing against them.So you would support a member of Progress over an actual socialist?
Not having a lib dem MP for a startwhy do you think they should support labour? what's in it for them?
that's a very limited change to their lives through a labour vote. what positive things would a labour government do for people iyo?Not having a lib dem MP for a start
thankfully that isn't the case. if it were I'd understand the logic of standing against them.
You would prefer a lib-dem to a tory MP though.Not having a lib dem MP for a start
they would get rid of the bedroom tax. This is a startthat's a very limited change to their lives through a labour vote. what positive things would a labour government do for people iyo?
So, weasel, in all areas without a progress candidate you wouldn't argue against non-labour party candidate involved in some form of anti-austerity activity standing against labour?
they would get rid of the bedroom tax. This is a start
What that it's possible to be a working class MP? Or that outwith the handful of areas with progress sponsored candidates you'll be supporting any and every labour candidate and opposing every candidate against labour? On the latter, above earlier today - on the former, are you denying it?where did I say that?
Nor did i say that you did. At least that would be some basis for your support of them - but no, you highlight that you will support them on an even flimsier basis.I didn't say that every candidate other than Progress ones are all working class MPs of ex-mining stock!
Yes, we know, vote labour, join labour, don't join anyone else, don't vote for anyone else.the prime basis for supporting them is as the only mechanicsm through which to kick out the Tories and LDs and punish them for their peformance in office.
When it comes to electoral interventions, if you are going to stand against Labour, choose your target well and only do so if you can expect to be seen as credible.
As a matter of fact I left the party and backed the Socialist Alliance in 2000 - and wasn't in the party at the time of invasion of Afghanistan/Iraq - both of which I opposed.
or what? or they'll confirm their own irrelevance and fail even in their own terms.Or what, you'll wag your finger whilst waffling on about your participation in activity outside of labour? You'll give them the enormous benefit of your tactical role in winning AV?
There is no 'or what'? You're the one who thinks you're playing chess here.or what? or they'll confirm their own irrelevance and fail even in their own terms.
except I don't act as an apologist for the leadership, I joined precisely to challenge the leadershipBut joined after. Kind of like bolshiebhoy joining the SWP after the Delta affair only even less honest.
Cracking job you're doing. They don't even know that you exist.except I don't act as an apologist for the leadership, I joined precisely to challenge the leadership