Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

14th November Movement for Left Unity

desperate is what you are doing here to try and legitimise your own position.
No, I'm realistic about the limitations and prospects of work within the LP. But I don't see any alternative on the electoral level now, and am pretty unimpressed by TUSC's apparent desire to fall flat on its face (however well motivated it might be). I won't taken any satisfaction in being proved right. I will be exasperated.
 
No, I'm realistic about the limitations and prospects of work within the LP. But I don't see any alternative on the electoral level now, and am pretty unimpressed by TUSC's apparent desire to fall flat on its face (however well motivated it might be). I won't taken any satisfaction in being proved right. I will be exasperated.
but you won't be proved right, you'll be proven a wanker's wanker time and time and time and time again.

it's often said principled people left the cp after hungary '56. you've had your hungary moments and you fluffed them all. when the labour government bombed yugoslavia, precipitating the kosovo crisis. when the labour government went into afghanistan. when the labour government went into iraq. not to mention all the shit things they did at home. for example, you were doubtless up in arms at the student fees in 2010. but who introduced tuition fees? was it not the er labour party?
 
And, oddly, he claims political descent from those who left in 56.
yet he's been an ardent supporter of the party which brought in great limits on protest, such as the prohibition on demonstrating near parliament - more severe than the auld sessional orders. he's what auld tankies refer to as a right-wing shit
 
No, I'm realistic about the limitations and prospects of work within the LP. But I don't see any alternative on the electoral level now, and am pretty unimpressed by TUSC's apparent desire to fall flat on its face (however well motivated it might be). I won't taken any satisfaction in being proved right. I will be exasperated.

If you want to hang out with/vote for the Bombers then fine. Hang out with them. But why waste your time on this thread telling other people they can't do X or Y? Is that one of your things? Telling people you don't know what they can/can't do? Bit creepy-weird.
 
And, oddly, he claims political descent from those who left in 56.

yet he's been an ardent supporter of the party which brought in great limits on protest, such as the prohibition on demonstrating near parliament - more severe than the auld sessional orders. he's what auld tankies refer to as a right-wing shit

Well the Labour Representation Committee has groups in it like the New Communist Party and Socialist Action which still venerate capitalist China and Russia. Has anyone considered that they might just really, really like authority?
 
If you want to hang out with/vote for the Bombers then fine. Hang out with them. But why waste your time on this thread telling other people they can't do X or Y? Is that one of your things? Telling people you don't know what they can/can't do? Bit creepy-weird.
he makes out he's a good old labour sort of guy. but he's just a run of the mill twat.
 
you've had your hungary moments and you fluffed them all. when the labour government bombed yugoslavia, precipitating the kosovo crisis. when the labour government went into afghanistan. when the labour government went into iraq.
As a matter of fact I left the party and backed the Socialist Alliance in 2000 - and wasn't in the party at the time of invasion of Afghanistan/Iraq - both of which I opposed.
 
As a matter of fact I left the party and backed the Socialist Alliance in 2000 - and wasn't in the party at the time of invasion of Afghanistan/Iraq - both of which I opposed.
which makes it worse that you see nothing wrong with being a member of the party now, after everything they've done. when did you rejoin the party?
 
the handful of lefts that include - for example - people in the leadership of Britain's biggest trade union (for example)? At least a dozen MPs (a dozen more than any putative left group will have the other side of the election). And a fair percentage of the membership given the last NEC election results...

So, whilst it would be wrong to argue that the left is anywhere near running the show, it's not as minimal or marginalised as all that.
Yes and they suffer from a form of Stockholm syndrome. A dozen MPs is not an impressive number given Labour's total number of MPs. In fact,that just shows how marginalised the Left is within Labour. Kinnock witch-hunted most of the socialists out of the party and those left-wing MPs who were left behind are ineffective.
 
Well done. (Got a job out of it as well didn't you? And look at what it's helped do to you). In what way does joining in 2007 mean that you didn't join the party that had done all these poisonous things?
 
The root of Todd’s problems
“From an early age, my grandfather instilled in me one key value: never, ever forget your roots,” Bianca Todd announced in The Guardian newspaper earlier this month, as she accused Ed Miliband of forgetting his.
In the 1980s, her grandfather, Ron Todd, was the most powerful trade unionist in the land, the general-secretary of the Transport and General Workers’ Union, whose massive block vote was the principle obstacle in the path of Neil Kinnock’s efforts to steer Labour into the centre ground. Todd’s granddaughter is a leading light in the Unite union and of Left Unity, which seeks to pull together the disparate groups left of the Labour Party.
An employment tribunal last week awarded three former staff of a Leicestershire youth organisation, Children: Homes, Advice and Teaching Ltd (C:HAT Room), more than £2,000 in unpaid wages and other monies owed to them. They had worked for C:HAT Room for about six months without being given contracts. The company’s head of service is Bianca Todd – she who never, ever forgets her roots.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...when-youve-got-fancy-restaurants-9215416.html

Hope this is just muckraking by the Blairite McSmith, but Bianca will have to answer this
 
Well done. (Got a job out of it as well didn't you? And look at what it's helped do to you). In what way does joining in 2007 mean that you didn't join the party that had done all these poisonous things?

There has never a time in Labour's history when it was possible to endorse the overall character of its politics. Just as previous entryists have joined to try to advance the case for an entirely different politics altogether, there is still a case for it.
 
Well, the left in general is ineffective in it's own terms. That is a reflection of the period we've been going through.
 
There has never a time in Labour's history when it was possible to endorse the overall character of its politics. Just as previous entryists have joined to try to advance the case for an entirely different politics altogether, there is still a case for it.
yes. but you're not making it.
 
There has never a time in Labour's history when it was possible to endorse the overall character of its politics. Just as previous entryists have joined to try to advance the case for an entirely different politics altogether, there is still a case for it.
Such sense of responsibility. All the good things (where's your list) = me, all the bad things =you (and anyway i joined after they happened and my role in the continuing existence of the party that wil allow them to do further bad things at a future date is irrelevant). Just pathetic politicians weaseling. You now mock the entryists for their failure and where its led them whilst pretending that your even more pathetic isolated entryism is actually going to be really different this time - despite the objective conditions it takes place in being incomparably worse and the subjective political composition of the party and wider society being even less welcoming to such nonsense. You are a fantasist as much any workers power cadre droning on about workers defence squads.
 
Well, the left in general is ineffective in it's own terms. That is a reflection of the period we've been going through.
This is marvelous stuff, you're now arguing that we should put out shoulders to the wheel of an ineffective group of labour MPS because they will bring catastrophic conditions for the working class. Don't you think things through before replying? I would expect a grandmaster of strategy like yourself to think a few steps ahead at the very least?

Btw, why 10 years after you argued that the handful of left labour mps were mere cover for the actions of the leadership - powerless window dressing - what has changed to convince you that the opposite is now the case?
 
All you're doing a8 ,is regurgitating the arguments that you have read that others made at various times in the labour parties history - most obviously in the Bevan/Gaitskill confrontations and the non-labour lefts reasons for entryism at that point, and the same debates around Bennism of the late 70s to mid-80s. These were living issues at that point due to a number of factors that no longer apply (mass working class membership and participation most obviously). Which is why regurgitation is all you have left - and you're too busy doing that to notice that most of the actors have left this particular stage. Come into the modern world.
 
I "mock the entryists for their failure" - where?! As for the "fantasist" stuff I've acknowledged that prospects for success are very limited in the short term. I spend very little time campaigning with/for Labour, and far more time campaigning with local anti-cuts group, community housing campaign, and fast food workers campaign.
 
I "mock the entryists for their failure" - where?! As for the "fantasist" stuff I've acknowledged that prospects for success are very limited in the short term. I spend very little time campaigning with/for Labour, and far more time campaigning with local anti-cuts group, community housing campaign, and fast food workers campaign.
What was my full sentence? Stop being a politician weasel.
 
. These were living issues at that point due to a number of factors that no longer apply (mass working class membership and participation most obviously). Which is why regurgitation is all you have left - and you're too busy doing that to notice that most of the actors have left this particular stage. Come into the modern world.

a significant % of the w/c will STILL (in 2015!) look to the election of a Labour government as the only way of kicking out the Tories/LDs and punishing them for the austerity they have inflicted (even if they recognise that what Labour is offering is a slightly ameliorated version of much the same thing).

But even those, possibly especially those, really pissed off with what Labour is offering are alienated *precisely because* they are judging it in relation to the efforts of the 45 government - like Loach. So they have to answer how it's more possible for a new formation to begin from scratch (without the institutional support of a major section organised Labour movement, the financial/political advantages that provides, and the degree of established public profile it enjoys) and make what is essentially a re-formed Labour party work where the orginal hasn't....
 
Back
Top Bottom