bluescreen
tofu eating wokerati
TBH I am much more concerned about people going out there in the first place than people coming back.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30048278
After weeks of negotiations PM David Cameron and his deputy Nick Clegg have agreed on new measures to try to stop British jihadists fighting in Iraq or Syria returning to the UK.
The intelligence services have estimated there are about 500 Britons who have gone to fight for the group known as Islamic State (IS).
Under the proposals unveiled by the prime minister during his visit to Australia, British fighters could be banned from coming home for two years.
The plans form part of the Counter-Terrorism Bill that the government hopes will be law by the end of January.
But it is highly contentious and there are serious concerns about whether it is workable given other established laws on citizenship, immigration and human rights.
'Managed return'
Critics fear that excluding Britons from returning to the UK - even if they face the most serious national security allegations - could amount to making them stateless.
There are numerous questions that lawyers and politicians will have about the legality of what is being proposed.
Mr Cameron also promised new powers to enable police to seize passports from would-be jihadists
First, there are the other countries involved. Will Turkey be happy to detain - for potentially months on end - a Briton suspected of illegally fighting for a terrorist organisation if he turns up at Ankara airport but is banned from departing for the UK?
It is not clear if the British government has negotiated any agreements as this stage.
There is also the question of why these people need to be excluded in the first place. Can't they be arrested and charged with supporting terrorism as soon as they arrive back?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30048278