Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Woolwich soldier killed (was "Did cops just shoot 2 dead in woolwich?")

I hope I'm wrong but I can see this type of action becoming a game changer.

If it ends up a game changer I suspect it will be down to 'our' response to it, rather than the quantity of such attacks.

Because as with other forms of terrorism I think there are a couple of large barriers that prevent there being a large number of such attacks on a semi-regular basis:

1) There are not all that many people actually prepared to carry out such attacks.

2) A portion of those that are will spend ages fantasising about it and will blab to others about their plans and end up nicked as a result.
 
I've read enough reports of things like the Iranian embassy and what not to know that there's no such thing as a shoot to wound policy. Happy to be corrected, if you want to produce something. Funny how nobody walks away from armed response shootings alive, though.

Inaccurate. They don't tend to walk away alive if they're hit by multiple rounds. Single rounds won't necessarily kill you.
 
TBF, I don't reckon old Pickers meant any harm by it though. A lot of people do have an often, at least partially, justifiable downer on afficionados of the white and the B, but I just couldn't see how Banhof read about this and the lightbulb above his head immediately illuminated whatever damp & mildew smelling room he found himself in with sixty watts of crackhead. Bag snatchings, bike thefts, shoplifting? Yes. Beheadings? Hardly an everyday gig.

Think I got the wrong end of the stick a bit to be honest, knackered and a bit stressed.

But that's just down to ignorance and stories about people in the US eating each other's faces and stuff. And an inability to distinguish between crack and PCP.
 
Think I got the wrong end of the stick a bit to be honest, knackered and a bit stressed.

But that's just down to ignorance and stories about people in the US eating each other's faces and stuff. And an inability to distinguish between crack and PCP.
an apology for your foul slur would show a nice spirit
 
If Willie Whitelaw could describe uproar in 1970s NI as an "acceptable level of violence", the Powers that Be can probably tolerate the odd random beheading here and there. Your mileage may vary of course.

I remember being taught that at uni, it's not specific to Northern Ireland it's a general tendency. They recognise it's more or less impossible bar some dystopian police state to prevent individual acts of barbarity like this. They might be able to stop large terrorist networks with more complicated plans but stuff like this what can you do? The doctrine of accepting you can't ever fully elimate terrorist but can only aim to reduce it to an "acceptable level of violence" is shared quite widely in different countries dealing with different terrorist groups.
 
I remember being taught that at uni, it's not specific to Northern Ireland it's a general tendency. They recognise it's more or less impossible bar some dystopian police state to prevent individual acts of barbarity like this. They might be able to stop large terrorist networks with more complicated plans but stuff like this what can you do? The doctrine of accepting you can't ever fully elimate terrorist but can only aim to reduce it to an "acceptable level of violence" is shared quite widely in different countries dealing with different terrorist groups.
so it is in fact NOT a general tendency, it is an attitude shared by some governments: quite a difference.
 
??

I thought he was referring to the way in which people stigmatise drug users, my like certainly was not agreeing with the idea that they should be. Have had enough problems in my own family with that to think that.

Forget it mate, bit stressed at the minute and I got the wrong end of the stick.
 
Back
Top Bottom