butchersapron
Bring back hanging
New idea - lab/con coalition to keep the lib-dems out of national power.
Ipsos MORI poll to be announced tmw:
CON 36%(+4), LAB 30%(+2), LDEM 23%(-9)
Up your two arses.
They've got my vote then. I'd pay anything to see you fighting on tower hill.True i heard they want to give trident to North Korea and cut pensions so they can help Iran build more nuclear weapons.
Apparently they are going to cut child benefit so that they can give more money to illegal immigrants to stage cock fighting on tower bridge.
Identify which employees are involved in the action and whether they are members of the union supporting the strike, members of a different union or non-union members.
Collect all information and communications relevant to the dispute in order to consider legal steps to prevent the planned strike and possible action against employees or the union involved.
£70 for a pair of pants.
the article says cleggs wife went shopping in a store that sells £70 knickers (well, bikini briefs whatever they are), not that she actually bought any.£70 for a pair of pants.
Clegg's wife is a partner in DLA Piper who give advice on how to break strikes here
Miriam is the head of Trade and is based in the London office. Her main areas of expertise are international and EU trade law and policy.
Anyone who thinks Scargill was only in it for himself is a cunt.
it may be one area the company specialises in, but it's not their only specialism, and she doesn't work in that area of the company.I couldn't care less if she personally directs these strike breaking operations or merely works for a company who makes them their specialty. It's rotten either way.
The true desperation is those who just shove everything mentioned on this thread and elsewhere under the carpet and pretend that they don't actually matter. The anti-union approach doesn't matter, the pro-private health care position doesn't matter, the pro-private education position doesn't matter, the 'break up the nhs' position doesn't matter, the neo-liberalism doesn't matter, the lies don't matter, the backhanders don't matter, the deceptions don't matter, the half-truths don't matter, the careful PR doesn't matter, the life of privilege doesn't matter - none of them matter, - the politics, in brief, don't matter - because you're voting for change.
it may be one area the company specialises in, but it's not their only specialism, and she doesn't work in that area of the company.
I doubt there'd be many specialist international corporate law firms that wouldn't have one branch of the firm dedicated to dealing with industrial action, so having a pop at her for joining this firm on this basis is irrational bollocks IMO.
not that I particularly agree with you about her needing to quit, but in the unlikely event that clegg did become PM (yeah right), she's apparently said she would quit her job.How about she stops being an international corporate lawyer?
She is vile as was her PP father.
[wiki]Asked by a Spanish newspaper, Miriam González said that she would quit her job if her husband became Prime Minister.[12]
I'd really like to know what he actually said.guardian said:Clegg said he remained, on balance, "a huge critic" of Margaret Thatcher, but admitted Britain needs to rediscover the zeal she showed when she tackled the unions.
I'd really like to know what he actually said.
All you have to do is look at other countries that have PR. Has capitalism been overturned? Has the neoliberal consensus been overturned? Is the parliament full of decent, honest actual representatives?Most of the arguments put forward for voting lib-dem on here (and let's be honest, there's only two - to stop the tories wining and to get PR) can, with minimal development, be used to support the lib-dems or labour for evermore. The idea that the political scene will inevitably fragment after some form of PR is brought in is a fantasy - politics will still be dominated by three parties and your vote at general elections will be dominated by the same themes as today - blocking one or another from forming a majority govt.
All you have to do is look at other countries that have PR. Has capitalism been overturned? Has the neoliberal consensus been overturned? Is the parliament full of decent, honest actual representatives?
I was told yes they - and directed to Germany where the Greens were in the national govt -only problem is, they were in social spending, pension cutting, workers sacking, NHS gutting, health and safety condition undermining, wage-cutting foreign troops sending govt. They clearly had little influence on their larger partners and were dragged rightwards rather than the big party being dragged leftwards. That was the only example that was found -and no aregumenst were offered as to why the same dynamics would not be at work here.
Most of the arguments put forward for voting lib-dem on here (and let's be honest, there's only two - to stop the tories wining and to get PR) can, with minimal development, be used to support the lib-dems or labour for evermore. The idea that the political scene will inevitably fragment after some form of PR is brought in is a fantasy - politics will still be dominated by three parties and your vote at general elections will be dominated by the same themes as today - blocking one or another from forming a majority govt.
I was told yes they - and directed to Germany where the Greens were in the national govt -only problem is, they were in social spending, pension cutting, workers sacking, NHS gutting, health and safety condition undermining, wage-cutting foreign troops sending govt. They clearly had little influence on their larger partners and were dragged rightwards rather than the big party being dragged leftwards. That was the only example that was found -and no aregumenst were offered as to why the same dynamics would not be at work here.
Of course PR will just be business as usual. But it start to scratch away at the fringes of the westminster club.
Of course PR will just be business as usual. But it start to scratch away at the fringes of the westminster club.
It's at this point that we diverge philisophically. I believe in reformism, and you believe in revolutionary politics. Therefore for you, reforms to the existing system are window dressing, and for me they are slow progress toward a different system.