butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Odd how Clegg based his attacks on labour and tories during the election squarely on the IFS's analysis of their proposals. If it's good enough for that clown...
Some people in the City may not think it's the biggest problem, you are right that there other problems. To state no-one in the city thinks it's the biggest problem seems a rather bold assertion though.
Thew3 IFS report was actually based on the treasury's own figures and included the effects of benefits cuts and tax changes which the OBR deliberately removed from their own calculations. You're going to have to do better than this if you want to rubbish it. Do you intend also to rubbish the IMF's and the OECDs substantially identical analysis too?
I don't support the Lib Dems but I think there is a lot of misinformation and misconception about the Lib Dem's behaviour in recent months and I want to help portray a fairer picture with the help of my partner who will supply the information for this thread.
More to come soon...
LOL.
It's reasonble, there is a massive Lib Demsmear campaignrealisation of what's actually going on.
Oh noez its a conspiracy Wonder if the Jews had anything to do with it?It's reasonble, there is a massive Lib Dem smear campaign going on.
It's reasonble, there is a massive Lib Dem smear campaign going on. You must be aware all of Labour's attack dogs are focusing on the party at the moment becuase they see it as the weak link in the Coalition. It's niave to think that all those spin doctors don't have an impact, Labour's media machine is massive.
i saw this banner at an exhibition on the industrial revolution today, and thought it had a new resonance.
Oooh I like this!!!
but both of those were earmarked for the chop in the Tories' manifesto anyway...We have had one term of Parliament since the election, in that we have the Identities and Document Bill which is scrapping ID cards and the closure of the ContactPoint Database,
actually, that the last budget hit the porest hardest was more or less proven by detailed analysis carried out by teams of qualified tax accountants (like LBJ said - "auditors") and no-one in the libdems has seriously queried or challenged their number-crunching. Those findings were NOT just 'opinion'.Different Economic Think tanks have their own methodologies and means of analysis.
PLease explain - SPECIFICALLY - how this is a 'myth', given that it is a centuries-old stratgem of those resisting real change, to fob people off with a cosmetic concession. AV will NOT deliver true proportionality, and it has not, anywhere else it has been introduced.Matthew Elliot from the Tax Payers Alliance who is running the NO2AV campaign will be peddelling the myth that AV will be barrier to PR and attempting to split the Yes vote. This type of attitude will result in the status quo. Labour will probably even promise PR to win back votes and lie again to people and fail to deliver anything like last time.
OH ffs!This is the most pointless post, I could easily say the same about people who blindly go on thinking having a massive defecit isn't a problem and that we can ignore problems that would result with losing our AAA credit rating.
alright, cap'n pedantic, how about this; "going by feedback received from the extensive number of City contacts I have acquired over the years, it seems there is an overwhelming, near-universal consensus that the deficit isn't the biggest problem UK plc faces, nor the hardest to solve".Some people in the City may not think it's the biggest problem, you are right that there other problems. To state no-one in the city thinks it's the biggest problem seems a rather bold assertion though.