Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Green Party is shit

Where were you studying? Did you graduate?

Yes, I did and I have no reason to tell you what I was studying or where I did. Love how I'm getting interrogated for posting an opinion and for expressing my democratic right to vote in an election.

Expected more of a welcome on here if I'm being honest. Not the most inviting place.
 
Yes, I did and I have no reason to tell you what I was studying or where I did. Love how I'm getting interrogated for posting an opinion and for expressing my democratic right to vote in an election.

Expected more of a welcome on here if I'm being honest. Not the most inviting place.
it's an initiation ritual. we've all been through it. and in all honesty you're getting an easier ride than a lot of people.
 
Is the class composition of the Scottish Greens different to the English and Welsh Greens?
 
you see, if I were an actual member I'd know that sort of thing.

Now you mention it, I did now what, but had forgotten.

So ok the green party south of the border has also had a 6-7k increase in membership.
You will be come may - delivering last minute leaflets, posters etc
 
the cap fits though doesn't it. Just look at the last few pages to see exactly what I'm talking about.
You see calls for ideological purity on this thread? When you were campaigning for the lib dems in 2010, were the people telling you then that you were making a mistake doing that too?
 
yes, increases in membership: but people leave political parties, sometimes in great numbers (e.g. bnp, labour) and sometimes rises in membership can disguise great turnover in membership, as happened with the bnp for some years.
no idea then, I don't know where I'd be able to find those numbers.

If there were significant numbers leaving as well, then that'd make it even more likely to be a different composition now than in 2011.
 
You see calls for ideological purity on this thread? When you were campaigning for the lib dems in 2010, were the people telling you then that you were making a mistake doing that too?
in future he should preface any political activity with the words 'as someone who once campaigned for the lib dems i know what it's like to make a mistake. and i'm probably making a mistake here too.'
 
Is that how it works though? You just get enough people to vote for a suitably left wing party and things change?

I'm just trying to think through how that's meant to work in the context of the example I mentioned a couple of pages back, where you've elected some councillors and they have to decide whether to try to get the least-worst compromise on an austerity budget or dig in for a proper fight with central government by refusing to pass an austerity budget, with all the risks to services that that entails.

It seems to me that for the second option (or any real challenge to the neo-liberal TINA consensus) to be realistic you need something better than a bunch of disillusioned floating voters who've drifted away from the Lib-Dems or nuLabour.

You need committed support from a section of the community who have a clear view of where their interests lie, how picking that fight is potentially going to further them, what's at stake and what the risks are etc.
 
Is that how it works though? You just get enough people to vote for a suitably left wing party and things change?

I'm just trying to think through how that's meant to work in the context of the example I mentioned a couple of pages back, where you've elected some councillors and they have to decide whether to try to get the least-worst compromise on an austerity budget or dig in for a proper fight with central government by refusing to pass a budget, with all the risks to services that that entails.

It seems to me that for the second option to be realistic you need something better than a bunch of disillusioned floating voters who've drifted away from the Lib-Dems or nuLabour.

You need committed support from a section of the community with a clear view of where their interests lie, how picking that fight is going to further them, what's at stake and what the risks are etc.

+contacts/networks/communication +chance of spreed though similarity of conditions. That's exactly how we did the poll tax. Hope lies outside the town halls.
 
+contacts/networks/communication +chance of spreed though similarity of conditions. That's exactly how we did the poll tax. Hope lies outside the town halls.

Sure but it doesn't seem to me that having representation the town halls is a totally bad thing, just so long as it is actually expressing the interests of a politically conscious mass of people of which it's an organic part, rather than being arbitrarily picked by bunch of floating voters who think democracy is some sort of shopping between 'brands' ...
 
Sure but it doesn't seem to me that having representation the town halls is a totally bad thing, just so long as it is actually expressing the interests of a politically conscious constituency, rather than being arbitarily picked by bunch of floating voters who think democracy is some sort of shopping between 'brands' ...
tell you what, if people standing for election had to be branded each time they stood you'd see far fewer of them doing it.
 
Not a fan of an unelected head of state myself, but like all systems, democracy isn't perfect but IMO it's the best we have.

For real? A minority of the populace pin the tail on the donkey once every five years and the declared winner has free reign to not do anything they promised once at the levers of power. That's democracy?
 
Back
Top Bottom