TruXta
tired
Gravity and stuff ...
I've been watching Brian Cox all week but it still hasn't sunk in.
Aye, they can't quite reconcile gravity within a relativism-quantum mechanics synthesis.
Gravity and stuff ...
I've been watching Brian Cox all week but it still hasn't sunk in.
It's just another one of his "god exists" threads, nothing more.
Au contraire, sweetie. Your arrival does.Ah, Beesonthetwatnow finally thinks it safe to poke his inane grinning head above the parapet.
That generally heralds the end of all sensible discussion.
So E=MC2 is basically OK ?
Au contraire, sweetie. Your arrival does.
Or, in the real world, Bees finally starts reading urban after spending xmas drinkingAh, Beesonthetwatnow finally thinks it safe to poke his inane grinning head above the parapet.
Or, in the real world, Bees finally starts reading urban after spending xmas drinking
I am right though, aren't I?
Or, in the real world
Phil's argument so far seems to be that because Darwinian gradualism is less than 100% as a theory this disproves all of Darwin, ergo God. So yes, bees, you're quite right.
Don't flatter yourself sweetie. I was referring, sweetie, to your effect on the level of intelligent debate on threads here.The answer's still no, sorry. You'll have to try a bit harder...
Don't flatter yourself, I was referring to your effect on the level of intelligent debate on threads here.
What's this now? A Jehovah's Twat thinks Beesonthetwatnow is right now?
I don't know if Beesonthetwatnow is too much of a twat now to take this advice now, but I'd advise Beesonthetwatnow to repudiate any advice from this particular quarter now.
Or Beesonthetwatnow might end up looking even more of a twat than he does now.
BTW in case drink has befuddled your brain, being called "sweetie" twice in one post is not a good thing.
This is internet gold this right here. Beesonthetwatnow.
Oh I get it, you're one of those lads that get a really childish sense of humour when you're in your cups. Carry on, son.
Bees
Yes, I see lots of evidence for natural selection, including a clear mechanism at the molecular level.
Using a "gap in the fossil record" to deny natural selection is like denying the earth rotates because it's sometimes too cloudy to see the sky.
Still on page 2 of this thread in my reading. Has this attack on Dwyer's position been refuted by him yet?
For a writer you're pretty fucking boring at times, phil.
is Dwyer still beating this silly drum, christ almighty.
he does this every other year , best to ignore.
Oh I get it, you're one of those lads that get a really childish sense of humour when you're in your cups. Carry on, son.
For a writer you're pretty fucking boring at times, phil.
It's probably a Christmas tradition for the poor bastard.
pretty fucking unconvincing as well. same tired old shit.