MrSki
Who am I to say you're wrong
Shame I thought this was is launch video.if I was an LP member, but she seems to be aiming to rival Barry Gardiner in the charisma bypass stakes.
Shame I thought this was is launch video.if I was an LP member, but she seems to be aiming to rival Barry Gardiner in the charisma bypass stakes.
So it looks like it will be Starmer. Happy with that, but now wondering if the Sunday tory press will start releasing whatever dirty they have on file.
They’ll also portray him as soft on immigrants and asylum seekers, a threat to nation security, part of the metropolitan elite etc.
Anyone is going to get that tbf. They can't be picking a leader on the basis of 'who won't the right wing press attack' as that person doesn't exist.
If it is Starmer, the Tory press’ strategy will be three-fold: (1) he’s pro EU, tried to block Brexit, can’t trust him that he won’t try and rejoin etc.: (2) hold him responsible for every scumbag who wasn’t prosecuted under his watch as DPP; (3) attack him for providing legal representation for individuals and groups deemed unpatriotic.
These lines of attack - especially the first two - will be very effective, no matter how bullshit they are.
Given that the majority of Labour members, as opposed to voters, are/were apparently Remain supporters, Starmer's stance may not be an obstacle to becoming leader.Starmer's problem with attack line 1 is that it is true. His ultra remain position alone makes him utterly unsuited for the task that Labour faces. That the conclusion he seems to have drawn from the disaster is that Labour wasn't remain enough brings into focus questions of basic competence. As for the latter two points of attack, there is no getting around his background as a key mover and shaker of the liberal narrating class. He needs to own it and deal with it.
Given that the majority of Labour members, as opposed to voters, are/were apparently Remain supporters, Starmer's stance may not be an obstacle to becoming leader.
It's after that that the problems would start.
lisa who?Leadership frontrunners both appoint pro-Corbyn figures to campaign teams - LabourList | Latest UK Labour Party news, analysis and comment
Both frontrunners in Labour’s leadership race – Rebecca Long-Bailey and Keir Starmer – have appointed key Corbynite figures…labourlist.org
LB appoints Lansmann as campaign director, Mat Cousins, Starmer more wider, Kat Fletcher(wasn't shein Workers Liberty once) and Simon Fletcher key Corbyn aides, but also Kendalls former L/S Bid organiser, Morgan McSweeney.
wondering who Lisa is appointing.
Exactly, the media and Tories will say very little at this point. But if Starmer wins, his position - which was to ignore the leader and conference, and keep pushing for a full remain position will be used to hammer him again and again. Wrong, disloyal and anti-democratic. Not a good look.
Starmer's problem with attack line 1 is that it is true. His ultra remain position alone makes him utterly unsuited for the task that Labour faces. That the conclusion he seems to have drawn from the disaster is that Labour wasn't remain enough brings into focus questions of basic competence.
Possibly, though maybe in a few years time, when the dire impact of actually existing Brexit is felt by the public, staunch remainerism may not be viewed so negatively. I suspect though the Tories and their faithful lapdogs in the vermin media will find some boogy man to blame for the country’s economic woes that the gullible public will fall for yet again.
Given the riots and strikes in France - as workers and unions fiercely resist the imposition of the EU's austerity agenda by its stooge Macron - it's clear that there are dire impacts from being part of the supra state too. The idea that there is going to be some popular clamour to rejoin a sinking club of neo-liberalism in a year or two is barmy. Even by your standards.
It must happen though, otherwise the party might as well disband.From what I've read in the last few weeks I'm not sure anybody can bring the labor factions together. All sides seem intent on ideological purity rather than forming a left of centre force that can win elections.
Possibly, though maybe in a few years time, when the dire impact of actually existing Brexit is felt by the public, staunch remainerism may not be viewed so negatively. I suspect though the Tories and their faithful lapdogs in the vermin media will find some boogy man to blame for the country’s economic woes that the gullible public will fall for yet again.
Agree that Labour Councils implementing austerity has made them unpopular. I've posted upthread about this and that local community minded people I know in Lambeth / London joined Labour party when Corbyn to try to change how a New Labour/ Blairite Council like mine worked.
However in my patch Brexit is not an issue. My local Council ward ( Coldharbour ) was in the top 10% most deprived wards in the country yet was 80% Remain.
Seem to me that Labour vote in Leave areas transferred to Tories as they wanted Brexit done. Not the same in my area. And Labour vote held up. Inner London is the new red wall.
However all the issues of a Council adminstration dominated by Blairites and the local working class feeling they are not represented still holds in my area. They know this but voting Tory is beyond the pale in my area.
Childrens centres etc have been an issue I my area.
When my popular local ward Clllr was kicked out by the Blairites because she could no longer stomach there way of running the Council they replaced her with the partner of another Blairite Cllr. As the New Labour lot control the selection of Ward Cllrs.
From the start my local Cllrs opposed Corbyn. They were not keen on the new increase of membership.
My popular ward Cllr who was kicked out ( Rachel a long time Cllr) told me that with Blair/ Iraq the membership had dropped off so much it was difficult to fill posts in local ward party. People thought what's the point in staying a member. She was a supporter of the Third Way. But as it progressed she got more fed up with it at a local level.
Given that the majority of Labour members, as opposed to voters, are/were apparently Remain supporters, Starmer's stance may not be an obstacle to becoming leader.
It's after that that the problems would start.
This is presumably what Starmer is counting on - that the UK will be even more immiserated post Brexit than it was to start with, and everyone will suddenly realise they voted the wrong way after all. Then he will triumphantly declare "I told you so!" and be swept to power on a wave of popular support.
I wonder how that strategy will work out for him.
Majority Labour voters, 2 to 1 broadly, voted remainGiven that the majority of Labour members, as opposed to voters, are/were apparently Remain supporters, Starmer's stance may not be an obstacle to becoming leader.
It's after that that the problems would start.
What are Labours plans to regenerate those forgotten towns given the fact that the EU failed to do so?Obviously that’s fanciful, but Starmer isn’t saying that tbf.
And unless you believe Tory Brexit is going to deliver prosperity to those forgotten towns and those using foodbanks at some point there will be at least some accounting for the opportunism and bullshit of Brexiteers.
That's not my recollection, though I may be wrong.Majority Labour voters, 2 to 1 broadly, voted remain
?
Groundhog Day subject this
Obviously that’s fanciful, but Starmer isn’t saying that tbf.
And unless you believe Tory Brexit is going to deliver prosperity to those forgotten towns and those using foodbanks at some point there will be at least some accounting for the opportunism and bullshit of Brexiteers.
Of course he's not saying it, the strategy is to wait until people realise they got it wrong. Then he'll say it.
While the Tory interpretation of the referendum will indeed not satisfy people, that does not mean that a political position of "we were right all along" will be of any use.
What are Labours plans to regenerate those forgotten towns given the fact that the EU failed to do so?
I really doubt that is going to be the message going forward. It may be ‘you should have made a deal that protected jobs etc’ but unless the whole shebang has gone utterly tits up no one is going to seek to refight the referendum.
There's quite a lot in it about funding local councils. Starting with the very first line of the Communities and Local Government section, Labour will reverse the Tory decade of austerity for local government and aim to restore council spending powers to 2010 levels over the lifetime of the Parliament.Yes, that's a very good point - for all the radical proposals in the manifesto there was nothing about funding local councils.
Majority Labour voters, 2 to 1 broadly, voted remain
That's not my recollection, though I may be wrong.
Are you/your source referring to Labour voters in 2017, 2019 or at some unspecified point in the past?