Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Who will be the next Labour leader?

Who will replace Corbyn?


  • Total voters
    161
I'm still trying to find any evidence of what AD actually believes in. There's bugger all on her website or her old MEP site, it's all mindbogglingly vague. Apparently she thinks companies should pay taxes, which is nice.
 
Anneliese Dodds, Shadow Chancellor
why do you like her? I really can't find out anything about her policy wise. She is for tax justice and has some (academic) experience in her field. But beyond that.....? Can you actually point to any coherent economic viewpoint she has ever come out as supporting?
 
Barbara Keeley. Was in Corbyn’s shadow cabinet. Not really part of his circle, more a party loyalist. Nevertheless always struck me as firmly on the left. She supported starmer in the leadership race and is (it would seem) delighted he won it. Not sure what this means (other than she wants to keep her job - which i hope she does)

Well she didn’t keep her job.
 
Why?

Does Keely has talent that her replacement doesn't have? (I have no idea, it's not my field of interest...), or are you angry that a sychophant has been fired?

Her sycophancy was weird - I took it as an attempt to keep a role which appears to itself have disappeared. Keeley was excellent in her role - and advocated for issues that many in the Labour Party wouldn’t go near (institutional abuse, ECT eg)

She had a ‘constituency’ (mental health and social care) and she fought for it. She kept out of factional battles. She took the initiative to speak to people and groups that political parties have long ignored - and recognised that improving MH services wasn’t as simple as just increasing funding. She got stuff that most wouldn’t.
 
Why?

Does Keely has talent that her replacement doesn't have? (I have no idea, it's not my field of interest...), or are you angry that a sychophant has been fired?
She's too old for Starmer, I think. 68 now, 72/3 by the next election. He wants exciting young guns! Who happen to be a bit more right-wing too.
 
Steve Reed is in. Bit right wing isn’t he? Did get ‘Seni’s law’ through so fair play to him on that.
 
why do you like her? I really can't find out anything about her policy wise. She is for tax justice and has some (academic) experience in her field. But beyond that.....? Can you actually point to any coherent economic viewpoint she has ever come out as supporting?
I liked the appointment because she comes across as bright and very competent in interviews & is somebody who is respected by all “factions”, including John McDonnell. Somebody like Rachel reeves, who loads of people were speculating would get the job, would have caused a big uproar.
 
Alinn-Khan has got the MH brief (which makes sense). Social care being lobbed in with Health (Ashworh’s brief).
 
Does any Oxford-dwelling Urban know what

fakeplasticgirl said:
Anneliese Dodds, Shadow Chancellor

is/was like as Oxford East constituency MP? :confused:

My mate who lives there doesn't rate her, but he's a mega-Oxford United supporting anarcho-syndicalist :cool: :p ;)
 
Does any Oxford-dwelling Urban know what



is/was like as Oxford East constituency MP? :confused:

My mate who lives there doesn't rate her, but he's a mega-Oxford United supporting anarcho-syndicalist :cool: :p ;)

She's only been MP since 2017 when the longstanding incumbent (Andrew Smith) retired (she was previously an MEP).

I've not lived in that constituency for a while now so can't judge her competence but she's part of that Oxford University Labour crowd. Privately educated then Oxford and her partner's deputy leader of Oxford City Council. That's as much as I know really
 
Good to have Oxford being discussed anyway :) -- my mate lives in Rose Hill**
I now know Oxford really well for someone who's never lived there myself.

**(and another good mate lives in Kidlington -- Oxford West).
 
Last edited:
not happy about social care being lumped in with health,.
the, official, Department is now the Dept of Health & Social Care, so it makes sense for them to copy that. I can't see who was actually responsible for SC under Blair/Brown, they don't seem to have had a specific minister at all then.
 
the, official, Department is now the Dept of Health & Social Care, so it makes sense for them to copy that. I can't see who was actually responsible for SC under Blair/Brown, they don't seem to have had a specific minister at all then.
Think that the LP could easily shadow the current arrangement with someone vaguely competent showing up Helen Whately for the lightweight former private health corp lobbyist that she is.
 
can’t speak for treelover, but my concern is twofold: 1) that putting health and social care together result in SC getting far less attention than it needs and 2) that separating MH and social care kind of misses the point in terms of what’s wrong with MH (which is largely that there’s nowhere near enough funding for and availability of social care services - this was something Keeley understood, not sure if RAK has the same knowledge of this but happy to find otherwise)
 
She doesn't seem to be winning the argument here

 
Back
Top Bottom