Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Who will be the next Labour leader?

Who will replace Corbyn?


  • Total voters
    161
By this stage she knows she's not going to be leader (if she didn't a long time ago) it's about positioning herself afterwards
Certainly the 'Leader' of blueLab, now...and probably already calculating positioning for when Starmer's lurch to the right fails at the next GE.
 
Certainly the 'Leader' of blueLab, now...and probably already calculating positioning for when Starmer's lurch to the right fails at the next GE.

I don’t think so. On both counts. Her policy ‘offer’ is deliberately impenetrable in places and often contradictory. But what emerges when she has been pressed on the detail are politics very similar to Starmer. She’s a better communicator. She cloaks the analysis in northern common sense language (as opposed to Starmer’s metropolitan narrating class pomposity) but fundamentally she ends with the same diagnosis as him.

On your second point I think she is trying to do two things here: ensure a high profile shadow cabinet role once Starmer is elected and I expect her to try to rack up enough votes to get Starmer in on second preference votes
 
I don’t think so. On both counts. Her policy ‘offer’ is deliberately impenetrable in places and often contradictory. But what emerges when she has been pressed on the detail are politics very similar to Starmer. She’s a better communicator. She cloaks the analysis in northern common sense language (as opposed to Starmer’s metropolitan narrating class pomposity) but fundamentally she ends with the same diagnosis as him.

On your second point I think she is trying to do two things here: ensure a high profile shadow cabinet role once Starmer is elected and I expect her to try to rack up enough votes to get Starmer in on second preference votes
Fair points, but her long game will have give enough distance from Starmer to allow her to conduct the same sort of schtick when he fails.
 
Yeah agree with smokeandsteam. Nandy's politics are pretty much same old same old (post) soft leftism labourite bollocks, she just does a semi decent job at obscuring her politics to play to different galleries. Her voting record and history doesn't really support a blue labour true believer, they both just see use in each other (like with miliband, also dreary same old post soft left)
 
Yeah agree with smokeandsteam. Nandy's politics are pretty much same old same old (post) soft leftism labourite bollocks, she just does a semi decent job at obscuring her politics to play to different galleries. Her voting record and history doesn't really support a blue labour true believer, they both just see use in each other (like with miliband, also dreary same old post soft left)

We also need to stop the Ed Miliband redux comparisons with Waitrose. The role he’ll play is far closer to Kinnock. Elected using the language of the left (and to be fair Kinnock had a better track record and use of the language) to move Labour to the right as fast as he can
 
Further evidence, if it was needed, that Waitrose is unfit for the leadership of the Labour Party. No lessons learnt from December. The smug insistence that he knows best. An explicit refusal to accept why the approach is toxic to voters

 
Further evidence, if it was needed, that Waitrose is unfit for the leadership of the Labour Party. No lessons learnt from December. The smug insistence that he knows best. An explicit refusal to accept why the approach is toxic to voters



An approach backed by the members of the labour party.
 
Can you point me to Keir Starmer demanding rejoining the EU?

Did you read the link I posted? Unlike RLB and Nandy Starmer refuses to rule out seeking to rejoin the EU.

Leaving aside the fact that this isn’t party policy - as you suggest it is - but after the referendum and the GE how much more evidence does Starmer need that his politics and instincts run counter to ordinary people? What does it say about his political judgment? Why would labour elect someone so out of touch?
 
Did you read the link I posted? Unlike RLB and Nandy Starmer refuses to rule out seeking to rejoin the EU.

Leaving aside the fact that this isn’t party policy - as you suggest it is - but after the referendum and the GE how much more evidence does Starmer need that his politics and instincts run counter to ordinary people? What does it say about his political judgment? Why would labour elect someone so out of touch?

Because the members prefer him or his policies to the other choices?

I didn’t suggest it was party policy. Simply that the members would like it to be so. Reflected if they choose to elect Starmer as their leader.

Ordinary people that aren’t members of the labour party?
 
Because the members prefer him or his policies to the other choices?

I didn’t suggest it was party policy. Simply that the members would like it to be so. Reflected if they choose to elect Starmer as their leader.

Ordinary people that aren’t members of the labour party?

What evidence have you got that Labour Party members want a campaign to rejoin the EU? Are you suggesting that they are as stupid as Starmer?

The idea that in 5 years time/10 years time there will be a popular impulse to rejoin the flagging neo-liberal EU project is frankly, fucking ridiculous.
 
What evidence have you got that Labour Party members want a campaign to rejoin the EU? Are you suggesting that they are as stupid as Starmer?

The idea that in 5 years time/10 years time there will be a popular impulse to rejoin the flagging neo-liberal EU project is frankly, fucking ridiculous.

If he said it and they vote for him.
 
Back
Top Bottom