fakeplasticgirl
Keirleader
Can’t tell if this is sarcastic or not?I agree with RLB, Corbyn’s leadership deserves a 10/10. The reactionaries and scabs of the electorate get a big fat zero.
Can’t tell if this is sarcastic or not?I agree with RLB, Corbyn’s leadership deserves a 10/10. The reactionaries and scabs of the electorate get a big fat zero.
By this stage she knows she's not going to be leader (if she didn't a long time ago) it's about positioning herself afterwardsYeah, 0/10 to Nandy for ability to unite the party. She didn't have to say all that.
Certainly the 'Leader' of blueLab, now...and probably already calculating positioning for when Starmer's lurch to the right fails at the next GE.By this stage she knows she's not going to be leader (if she didn't a long time ago) it's about positioning herself afterwards
Why did Corbz get so many votes in 2017 then?No, corbyn’s leadership was a bigger factor than Brexit.
View attachment 200755
Anyway, I’m repeating myself now as I’ve posted about this before.
Certainly the 'Leader' of blueLab, now...and probably already calculating positioning for when Starmer's lurch to the right fails at the next GE.
Fair points, but her long game will have give enough distance from Starmer to allow her to conduct the same sort of schtick when he fails.I don’t think so. On both counts. Her policy ‘offer’ is deliberately impenetrable in places and often contradictory. But what emerges when she has been pressed on the detail are politics very similar to Starmer. She’s a better communicator. She cloaks the analysis in northern common sense language (as opposed to Starmer’s metropolitan narrating class pomposity) but fundamentally she ends with the same diagnosis as him.
On your second point I think she is trying to do two things here: ensure a high profile shadow cabinet role once Starmer is elected and I expect her to try to rack up enough votes to get Starmer in on second preference votes
Mind you, I did it this morning, narrowed my eyes and gritted my teeth and voted RLB and Nandy as second pref, didn't use third pref, fuck off posh chin. Next step is to cancel political fund, fuck participating in this bollocks again
who did you vote deputy?
Yeah agree with smokeandsteam. Nandy's politics are pretty much same old same old (post) soft leftism labourite bollocks, she just does a semi decent job at obscuring her politics to play to different galleries. Her voting record and history doesn't really support a blue labour true believer, they both just see use in each other (like with miliband, also dreary same old post soft left)
Why have you signed up to receive email communications from him if you loathe him so?
Further evidence, if it was needed, that Waitrose is unfit for the leadership of the Labour Party. No lessons learnt from December. The smug insistence that he knows best. An explicit refusal to accept why the approach is toxic to voters
Don't suppose it's active; I presume that the candidates forked out £6k for the members, affiliates & supporters so they could bomb out the emails etcWhy have you signed up to receive email communications from him if you loathe him so?
Why have you signed up to receive email communications from him if you loathe him so?
An approach backed by the members of the labour party.
Why have you signed up to receive email communications from him if you loathe him so?
can you point me to the policy that demands rejoining the EU?
Can you point me to Keir Starmer demanding rejoining the EU?
Did you read the link I posted? Unlike RLB and Nandy Starmer refuses to rule out seeking to rejoin the EU.
Leaving aside the fact that this isn’t party policy - as you suggest it is - but after the referendum and the GE how much more evidence does Starmer need that his politics and instincts run counter to ordinary people? What does it say about his political judgment? Why would labour elect someone so out of touch?
Because the members prefer him or his policies to the other choices?
I didn’t suggest it was party policy. Simply that the members would like it to be so. Reflected if they choose to elect Starmer as their leader.
Ordinary people that aren’t members of the labour party?
What evidence have you got that Labour Party members want a campaign to rejoin the EU? Are you suggesting that they are as stupid as Starmer?
The idea that in 5 years time/10 years time there will be a popular impulse to rejoin the flagging neo-liberal EU project is frankly, fucking ridiculous.
Tbh a huge chunk of the membership are as stupid as starmer as to think it's a good idea, dunno whether a majority but there are plenty of them. The bellends.