J Ed
Follow Back Pro Expropriation
have you decided what these are? I mean you've neatly split off 'white working class causes' from the issues facing the working class as a whole so lets hear them.
IMO You can only really think about the concept of white working-class issues, as opposed to working-class issues, if you are so committed to neoliberal ideology that you conceptualise the people entirely as segmented consumers in the same way that they are targeted by say advertising companies, rather than as workers who also have X, Y and/or Z identity. It seems to be a world that sees only social issues as being the only issues which are legible within the political terrain, everything else is out of bounds of politics and is not worth talking about and when someone disagrees with that then they are perceived as detracting from the only politics which is possible and they are doing so because they are secretly motivated by racism, sexism or whatever else. In a sense I think that this is where so much of the hostility towards even the mildest of social democratic reforms, in reality probably it's more accurate to call it souped up welfare liberalism, comes from. The idea that any working-class grievance could be legitimate, or any actual change to the way in which neoliberalism functions, has become common sensical for the political and media class and the ever decreasing number of people who still buy what they are selling.
Add to that toxic mix a situation in which wages have declined since the 70s, cost of living has increased and the fact that life has simply become unliveable for millions of people, and a candidate on the other side who is actually willing to acknowledge those realities but also mobilise voters on the basis of nativist animus... the worldview outlined above is going to lose every single time.
Last edited: