Corax
Luke 5:16
Am interesting place for corporation tax lawyers, funnily enough.no, that's the azores
Am interesting place for corporation tax lawyers, funnily enough.no, that's the azores
very nice place for a holiday too, and if the sea's calm you can go whale watchingAm interesting place for corporation tax lawyers, funnily enough.
very nice place for a holiday too, and if the sea's calm you can go whale watching
Of the aquatick variety
I'm not sure wether it's his Twittering little hands or the appearance of the US being run by an unreliable Putin fan who thinks Europeans are in rent arrears to him but he's having an effect on European defence spending....
One senior EU diplomat said the EU’s ambitions would be judged more on its ability to coordinate security and defense policy and less on its ability to reform the eurozone.
“The real test is going to be on defense and not on the euro,” the diplomat said, noting that if a conflict were to develop in, say, the Balkans, the EU should have the capability to intervene without turning to London or Washington to take the lead.
This ability to put EU boots on the ground will depend heavily on decisions over the next few months on financing for existing EU battlegroups, comprised of approximately 1,500 soldiers, which have never been deployed, mainly because of funding disputes.
Until now, defense cooperation in Europe has existed mainly at the bilateral or regional level. According to a study by the European Parliament, there were nearly 400 ongoing military cooperation projects in Europe in early 2015.
Among the existing partnerships is a joint procurement program for ammunition for an anti-tank system used by Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic and Poland.
...
by banking standards - and corporate standards - the guy's positively saintlyNot Trump but US news - the primaries for New Jersey Governor race have just been held and the Democrats have decided on Phillip Murphy, a bloke with a 23 history at Goldman Sachs and who
Lovely, what a generous man.
I'm not certain it would. A lot of the companies that service voting machines are owned by Republicans. There's already something called "red shift" that's been happening with voting machines. I don't think the Republicans, who are in control of both those bodies, want anyone to know.
Red Shift: why it's important
Wisconsin: None dare call it vote rigging
Hey, maybe they just felt hungry!Donald Trump To Dine With Two Senators Who Will Question James Comey
I'm sure the timing is merely a coincidence. Nothing to see here.
What species of Whale?very nice place for a holiday too, and if the sea's calm you can go whale watching
Precisely
Tasteless comment...........but I can't help liking it, as per this one individualWhile a big part of his base (and indeed the general public) would applaud a big infrastructure bill, those Tea party republicans in the house and Senate, will figuratively die before passing any big spending agenda.
He'll get fucked in both holes by this one. Marvelous.
Important point. Worth reading this thread on the nature of Trump's support and how it's fading. Most significantly he's losing the Clinton hating conventional Republicans he needed to win the election.
Occurs to me that means he's in trouble. He'll need to rally the respectables to win a second term in 2020. There'll be no pre-demonised Dem hate figure that the GOP have been throwing shit at for decades to run against.
Silver also pointed out earlier things like ditching Paris are pretty bad politics. Republicans will mostly approve of the affront to tree huggers but a lot of them only weakly. For a broad swath of Dems piously obsessed with things eco on the other hand its like he killed Bambi. 2020 will be all about turnout and Trump's mobilising the wrong side.
In Politico Trump tweets propel Europe into new military age
I'm not sure wether it's his Twittering little hands or the appearance of the US being run by an unreliable Putin fan who thinks Europeans are in rent arrears to him but he's having an effect on European defence spending.
This will probably all go pear shaped, whatever the precise EU standard is for that, military affairs hasn't been their thing. However the Brexiting Brits have gone all quiet about these EU Johnnies sidelining NATO. Rather eager for some juicy defence contracts it seems.
Any EU 'army' will certainly go 'pear shaped' without a U.K. Involvement.
Have a look at the various 'suggestions' Re; European army/defence force, and The French ambivalence towards NATO membership....how so?
"This will probably all go pear shaped, whatever the precise EU standard is for that, military affairs hasn't been their thing. However the Brexiting Brits have gone all quiet about these EU Johnnies sidelining NATO. Rather eager for some juicy defence contracts it seems"
Can you expand on your last paragraph?
Any EU 'army' will certainly go 'pear shaped' without a U.K. Involvement.
Mebbes the next time, we should just keep our noses out, and let our continental cousins sort themselves out
Harris was questioning Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, asking him if he would send a letter to Special Counsel Robert Mueller giving him unlimited authority in his probe into possible ties between President Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia.
The exchange was tense, with Harris interrupting Rosenstein as he started to say there wasn’t enough time to explain the answer. When she asked for a yes or no answer, he demurred, and she said, “either you are willing to do that or not.”
Republican Sen. John McCain first interjected, out of turn, with a plea to the committee chairman, Sen. Richard Burr: “Mr. Chairman, they should be allowed to answer the question.”
As the exchange between Harris and Rosenstein continued, Burr interjected and asked Harris to suspend.
“The chair is going to exercise the right to allow the witnesses to answer the question, and the committee is on notice to provide the witnesses the courtesy – which has not been extended all the way across – extend the courtesy for questions to get answered.”
Well, this was bound to happen sooner or later:
I was not implying that absent the Brits a European effort would fall apart. In general I tend to share the French opinion that London often pushed the EU in really dysfunctional directions."This will probably all go pear shaped, whatever the precise EU standard is for that, military affairs hasn't been their thing. However the Brexiting Brits have gone all quiet about these EU Johnnies sidelining NATO. Rather eager for some juicy defence contracts it seems"
Can you expand on your last paragraph?
Any EU 'army' will certainly go 'pear shaped' without a U.K. Involvement.
Mebbes the next time, we should just keep our noses out, and let our continental cousins sort themselves out
We, the apathetic AMerican assholes that brought the world this idiot, call him "RoadKill" as he looks as though he has a dead critter found alongside the road,placed upon his bald pate'. When I found out he had won all I could say was :"Oh, this should be interesting" not to disappoint he fired off 40 or 80 cruise misses into Soriano, whom we had communication with,but now think to old RoadKill Isis is now running Seria. The NSA runs the country anyway. PEOPLE OF THE WORLD, WE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT WE HAVE BROKEN THE WORLD. SORRY BOUT THAT ALL.Related to that, also claimed a president who died years before the civil war could have prevented it if he had postponed taking office until that period (Jackson, zombie POTUS)...
How about "honest loyalty" and maybe a reduced sentence if you rat out Jared?I think I should make it clear to everyone on this thread that I need loyalty, I expect loyalty.
A lot of voters smelling something fishy here....
In a poll released at the end of last month, 37 percent of respondents approved of the job the president was doing and 55 percent disapproved.
The new poll also finds 31 percent of voters think Trump did something illegal regarding his relationship with Russia.
Another 29 percent of respondents think the president did something unethical, but not illegal, regarding his relationship with Russia. Thirty-two percent think the president did nothing wrong.
Forty percent of voters think Trump's campaign advisers did something illegal in their relationships with Russia, while another 25 percent think they did something unethical, but not illegal.
A majority of voters, 54 percent, think Trump is too friendly with Russia, compared to 38 percent who think he has the right attitude toward Russia.
Nearly 70 percent of voters are "very concerned" or "somewhat concerned" about the president's relationship with Russia.
The poll was conducted from May 31 to June 6 among 1,361 voters. The margin of error is 3.2 percent.
...