Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

what no annual poppy bunfight thread?

poppy?


  • Total voters
    120
rtE5npw.jpg
 
You are being considerably less than accurate here. You will struggle to find a post where I gratuitously abused anyone. I used to respond, now I just put obnoxious arseholes like OU on ignore.
Can someone tell the fool that the post he squealed about wasn't even by OU but me.
 
uk and france possibly stopped the US attempting a "limited" nuclear war in europe.

out of the nuclear club UK and France are the least evil although the UK following the US lead on everything isnt helpful
russia bond villian
USA sane but evil chance to be replaced by more of the sane or Moonbats are us:eek:
china evil but not really are problem
isreal evil and capable of starting something possibly the samson option:eek:
india could probably survive a nuclear war with its neighbours
pakistan evil corrupt and paranoid that america's going to steal its nukes

North korea eat a snickers kim please not really a threat but a problem never the less

also runs

iran of course its for peaceful use the fact its underground surrounded by missiles is for self defence:facepalm:
japan could have nukes with in 6 months if they wanted them possibly doesnt.Germany and canada similarly
argentina the nazis have all died by now so no chance
south africa they burned the plans

:(
 
That's hardly abuse. It IS vile to advocate the murder of millions of civilians just as a tit for that tactic that hastens the end of the world as we know it.

It works though obscene as it is nuke me I nuke you. Has stopped the 3rd world war happening on numerous occasions nothing other than mad seems to work.
 
It works though obscene as it is nuke me I nuke you. Has stopped the 3rd world war happening on numerous occasions [B}nothing other than mad seems to work.[/B]
In a thread with some spectacularly stupid posts this might be the best (tied with likefish's last stream of shite). How the fuck can you possibly know that strategies other than MAD won't work? Is it based on some special exploration of all the alternate dimensions?

What absolute fucking brain dribbling nonsense
 
In a thread with some spectacularly stupid posts this might be the best (tied with likefish's last stream of shite). How the fuck can you possibly know that strategies other than MAD won't work? Is it based on some special exploration of all the alternate dimensions?

What absolute fucking brain dribbling nonsense
Has a nation with a nuke ever been messed with?. What was the alternative strategy in the Cold war then?. Trust the Soviets would just stop at Eastern Europe?
 
uk and france possibly stopped the US attempting a "limited" nuclear war in europe.

out of the nuclear club UK and France are the least evil although the UK following the US lead on everything isnt helpful
russia bond villian
USA sane but evil chance to be replaced by more of the sane or Moonbats are us:eek:
china evil but not really are problem
isreal evil and capable of starting something possibly the samson option:eek:
india could probably survive a nuclear war with its neighbours
pakistan evil corrupt and paranoid that america's going to steal its nukes

North korea eat a snickers kim please not really a threat but a problem never the less

also runs

iran of course its for peaceful use the fact its underground surrounded by missiles is for self defence:facepalm:
japan could have nukes with in 6 months if they wanted them possibly doesnt.Germany and canada similarly
argentina the nazis have all died by now so no chance
south africa they burned the plans

:(
i beg your pardon?
 
Has a nation with a nuke ever been messed with?. What was the alternative strategy in the Cold war then?. Trust the Soviets would just stop at Eastern Europe?

Define messed with? America has nukes and had two airliners flown into their major financial center causing huge economic harm and chaos.
 
What the soldier said was absolutely correct. A deterrence is of no use if you state categorically that it won't be used.
If you subscribe to the logic of deterrence, that may be right. What is at issue is the fact that 'Sir' Nicolas was (unwisely) drawn into making a very public intervention into a intra and inter party political debate. He has no right to do so in his professional capacity.
 
America remains the only country to have used nuclear weapons against human targets after their invention. Since then, despite the non proliferation treaty, they have spread to a number of nations and no nation has unilaterally disarmed once they were in possession of functional nuclear weapons.
 
America remains the only country to have used nuclear weapons against human targets after their invention. Since then, despite the non proliferation treaty, they have spread to a number of nations and no nation has unilaterally disarmed once they were in possession of functional nuclear weapons.
Thanks for enlightening us.
 
America remains the only country to have used nuclear weapons against human targets after their invention. Since then, despite the non proliferation treaty, they have spread to a number of nations and no nation has unilaterally disarmed once they were in possession of functional nuclear weapons.

South Africa...

And in a different manner Kazakhstan and Ukraine.
 
In a thread with some spectacularly stupid posts this might be the best (tied with likefish's last stream of shite). How the fuck can you possibly know that strategies other than MAD won't work? Is it based on some special exploration of all the alternate dimensions?

What absolute fucking brain dribbling nonsense

Well the soviet union and the US both engaged in proxy wars or out right invasions against nuclear powers.
chinas attacked vietnam
India and pakistan havn't fought a war since they got nukes.
 
Back
Top Bottom