littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
France is in NATO.*Not sure if France is in NATO at the moment.
Ok, poor old Switzerland. Defenceless in the face of North Korea's might.
France is in NATO.*Not sure if France is in NATO at the moment.
But its cultural innit part of are deep seated traditions just ask the irishBritannia fucking up the middle east since the crusades
go UK indeed
Can someone tell the fool that the post he squealed about wasn't even by OU but me.You are being considerably less than accurate here. You will struggle to find a post where I gratuitously abused anyone. I used to respond, now I just put obnoxious arseholes like OU on ignore.
France is in NATO.
Ok, poor old Switzerland. Defenceless in the face of North Korea's might.
That's hardly abuse. It IS vile to advocate the murder of millions of civilians just as a tit for that tactic that hastens the end of the world as we know it.
In a thread with some spectacularly stupid posts this might be the best (tied with likefish's last stream of shite). How the fuck can you possibly know that strategies other than MAD won't work? Is it based on some special exploration of all the alternate dimensions?It works though obscene as it is nuke me I nuke you. Has stopped the 3rd world war happening on numerous occasions [B}nothing other than mad seems to work.[/B]
Has a nation with a nuke ever been messed with?. What was the alternative strategy in the Cold war then?. Trust the Soviets would just stop at Eastern Europe?In a thread with some spectacularly stupid posts this might be the best (tied with likefish's last stream of shite). How the fuck can you possibly know that strategies other than MAD won't work? Is it based on some special exploration of all the alternate dimensions?
What absolute fucking brain dribbling nonsense
i beg your pardon?uk and france possibly stopped the US attempting a "limited" nuclear war in europe.
out of the nuclear club UK and France are the least evil although the UK following the US lead on everything isnt helpful
russia bond villian
USA sane but evil chance to be replaced by more of the sane or Moonbats are us
china evil but not really are problem
isreal evil and capable of starting something possibly the samson option
india could probably survive a nuclear war with its neighbours
pakistan evil corrupt and paranoid that america's going to steal its nukes
North korea eat a snickers kim please not really a threat but a problem never the less
also runs
iran of course its for peaceful use the fact its underground surrounded by missiles is for self defence
japan could have nukes with in 6 months if they wanted them possibly doesnt.Germany and canada similarly
argentina the nazis have all died by now so no chance
south africa they burned the plans
Has a nation with a nuke ever been messed with?. What was the alternative strategy in the Cold war then?. Trust the Soviets would just stop at Eastern Europe?
The Argentinians invaded the Falklands, despite Britain having nukes.Has a nation with a nuke ever been messed with?. What was the alternative strategy in the Cold war then?. Trust the Soviets would just stop at Eastern Europe?
Really? The evil red empire just waiting to invade. Christ.Has a nation with a nuke ever been messed with?. What was the alternative strategy in the Cold war then?. Trust the Soviets would just stop at Eastern Europe?
Because they were worth trusting, right?Really? The evil red empire just waiting to invade. Christ.
Really? The evil red empire just waiting to invade. Christ.
This is a good point. Maybe thatcher realised she didn't need them.The Argentinians invaded the Falklands, despite Britain having nukes.
This is a good point. Maybe thatcher realised she didn't need them.
If you subscribe to the logic of deterrence, that may be right. What is at issue is the fact that 'Sir' Nicolas was (unwisely) drawn into making a very public intervention into a intra and inter party political debate. He has no right to do so in his professional capacity.What the soldier said was absolutely correct. A deterrence is of no use if you state categorically that it won't be used.
where should they have nuked then?Define messed with? America has nukes and had two airliners flown into their major financial center causing huge economic harm and chaos.
Really? The evil red empire just waiting to invade. Christ.
where should they have nuked then?
Thanks for enlightening us.America remains the only country to have used nuclear weapons against human targets after their invention. Since then, despite the non proliferation treaty, they have spread to a number of nations and no nation has unilaterally disarmed once they were in possession of functional nuclear weapons.
America remains the only country to have used nuclear weapons against human targets after their invention. Since then, despite the non proliferation treaty, they have spread to a number of nations and no nation has unilaterally disarmed once they were in possession of functional nuclear weapons.
I thought someone might come up with that, I did say in possession of functional nuclear weapons, I don't think South Africa ever had that did they?South Africa...
Yes a different manner, Soviet nukes based on their land.And in a different manner Kazakhstan and Ukraine.
In a thread with some spectacularly stupid posts this might be the best (tied with likefish's last stream of shite). How the fuck can you possibly know that strategies other than MAD won't work? Is it based on some special exploration of all the alternate dimensions?
What absolute fucking brain dribbling nonsense