ok, well it is now or at least will be very very soon
the doors that way if it is unacceptable to you>>>>>>>>>>
... it would be a shame to leave the job because of having to comprimise your principles in one tiny area and deprive your clients of all the other skills you have to offer
in your world it may be that way, for us in the lower level working classes, if you fuck up you get sacked.
with healthcare professionals its very much based on an ability to do the job (as well as know the theory underpinnign why you would do the job in that way)..
same in construction, same in retail, engineering and so on
i work 9-5 and so does my wife 3 days a week...... because we have to to earn the money we need to earn to pay for our home, food, bills.....
unlike yourself, we dont feel it is morraly acceptable to expect others to support us
yes im blowing my own trumpet, because i work fucking hard, i work well (can always do better) and i object to a being told "i must be hated by my clients" by a drugs worker who doesnt even know what her job is really all about
ok?
with that and your previous post in mind.. as your child is so far away, how does working part time help? why are you choosing to live so far away?
i have a child (well he is 22 soon... eek!) that i was seprated from (i paid maintainence even before the existence of the CSA... its wasnt my choice to do so, it was my responsibility as his father) i had weekend access (defined as sat 12noon til sun 5pm) working full time didnt prevent me from having him with me from after school on friday til sunday 5pm.... i lived 60 miles away
im even more confused now... you dont have even shared custody?.. i thought you were a single parent with full time care....
you know what, i dont care
enjoy the labour state while it lasts, the tories will oh so clealry be in next may
than you will ahve something to compalin about
as will you because youll probably be out of a job
what ever you say
Well given they’re about 40% of the electorate, it would appear the real misanthrope is actually you. Here’s a question, what percentage of the average income should be given to the unemployed and sick do you think?jiggajagga said:Oh and you are the type of cunt that I despise by the way. All you care about is yourself, yourself and er.....yourself. (otherwise known as a tory).
Well given they’re about 40% of the electorate, it would appear the real misanthrope is actually you. Here’s a question, what percentage of the average income should be given to the unemployed and sick do you think?
if i worked 9-5 then i would never see my son, who lives on the other end of the country to me
not that its any of your business, i just mention it to point out that peoples needs are diverse and complex
and thats exactly what the problem is with your attitude and this new legislation
its an attack on the most vulnerable, it wont help anyone, it will make things worse and what will actually happen in practice is it will be fudged, blagged and nothing will actually change except that some of the poorest most vulnerable people in the country will end up poorer and more vulnerable
you dont give a person a hand up by kicking them whilst they're down and that's exactly what the new scheme will do
what ever you say
but to keep you happy
the tories like a big bang for their buck
i have high value skills but only attract a low value wage
to explain.. i can do everything a (staff grade) doctor can do (within the limits of my speciality) but at 50% of the cost
so... i think my post is safe as i can nurse, key work, supervise, drug screen and do all those nursey and drug worker things AND i can write out scripts for the drugs my clients need to break the link between addicition and criminality
my job is safe, the tories like drugs treatments albeit in quite restrictive formats
if i was a doctor or drugs worker (ie didnt have nursing qualifications and a prescribing license) meaning i was either expensive or of limited usefulness.... then i would be concerned
e2a: it was during the last tory government that drug services started to become meaningful with drug policy moving away from wholly punitive culture throughout the late 70's and early 80's culminating in the 10 year drug strategy at the start of 1998 (devised in the tory house, implemented under labour)
well you are in one of those politically correct positions that the tories have railed against
the tories were quite happy with high unemployment, whilst they may have made occasional soundbites they were well aware that keeping a percentage of the population on benefits and in poverty was in the interests of those who control labour
it was people like you who lost their jobs and it will be again under a tory government
scabs get shot first by the powers that be, always have, always will
Just read this posting. Very interesting points of view.
Jonajuna I say to you; don't get ill, don't get injured, don't lose your job in an emplyment blackspot, don't get older and you will be fine in this 'green and pleasant land, this England'.
Oh and you are the type of cunt that I despise by the way. All you care about is yourself, yourself and er.....yourself. (otherwise known as a tory).
I wrote on these boards 2 yrs ago that we are sleepwalking into a nightmare by allowing governments to do what they wished with the unemployed and sick, that we had to fight back in any way we could.
Well, the chickens are coming home to roost I fear! Just wait till the tories like jonajuna get into power next year. You ain't seen nothin' yet folks!
It’s a bit of myth I reckon that their position is due to them not being aware of the level of suffering. More that they have a different take when it comes to the extent to which that suffering should be mitigated. It may just be case that their position is closer to the “average” punter’s view, and you harbour an eccentric compassion perhaps through some sentimental identification with the weak or otherwise inept. ‘course it ties in with some arbitrary idea of innocence and guilt and moral choice. If you could find some stain on their character, even if limited only to their abhorrent opinions on this-or-that, their suffering would be fair game no doubt.trevhagl said:Very true and the worst thing is no one will change it because none of the politicians have any knowledge of what it's like.
Oh don’t tell me you’re another sanctimonious bastion of righteousness who believes 40% of the electorate are indecently selfish. It really is like a western with plucky underdog goodies and bully boy baddies in there isn’t it.trevhagl said:sad but very very true...
It’s a bit of myth I reckon that their position is due to them not being aware of the level of suffering. More that they have a different take when it comes to the extent to which that suffering should be mitigated.
for want of the price, of tea and a slice, the old man died.
to declare 40% of the electorate as indecently selfish sounds like the ranting of a religious maniac. Repent Sodom for the end is nigh.
Of course we are you idiot. Thats why we are fucked by the bankers, why we are fucked over climate change. WE are too selfish to change for the betterment of all...just for the individual!
We are all Doooomed doooomed I tells yah!
Ever read the Selfish Gene?