I was thinking of just setting up a download parlour page, but just stuffed full of malware in the download.I reckon that the FBI need to run an ISP (proxy server) to make it appear that parler have found a way to stay on AWS - they can then monitor these shitheads and carry out enough busts to keep their violence under control. A bit safer than a physical infiltration.
I wouldn't normally advocate such clandestine monitoring, but for these fash, I'll make an exception.
I was crying at that point. Though I think it would have been even better if he invoked Kindrgarden Cop rather than ConanI like the bit where he gets the sword out.
Not US born so ineligible. It’s been suggested before.
Yep. Dolly Parton for president though that would work.
Pure laughter the second he got his toy sword outWith laughter or due to his pathos
I thought he hammed it up beautifullyPure laughter the second he got his toy sword out
Pure laughter the second he got his toy sword out
Yep. Dolly Parton for president though that would work.
The bit about his dad was powerful, though. That's how you compare Trump to Hitler. Kind of went downhill from that point...The fucking sword...
Pretty clever prop placement/analogy to use though given he's trying to get through to people who seem to have accepted a con-artist reality TV show President as the closest thing there is to God.
I mean..they all wanna be Conan right?
The fucking sword...
Pretty clever prop placement/analogy to use though given he's trying to get through to people who seem to have accepted a con-artist reality TV show President as the closest thing there is to God.
I mean..they all wanna be Conan right?
I've been following this thread and am genuinely wondering to what extent youtube has affected/emboldened these people (Trumpists). With the way its algorithms work, some body could start out searching "Are vaccines really safe?" and in a very short space of time could find themselves having the most out-there Qanon (etc) stuff suggested to them. It monetises people's curiousity/vulnerability/discontent etc, and I wonder how much of the blame lies there, as much as the orange bellend himself. I'm not that clued up the ins and outs of American politics and society to know how much difference it would've made if youtube didn't work that way.
(Go easy - this is my first post.)
The medium has changed, so the speed that ideas can circulate has increased. But is it so different from before, back when propaganda was spread by pamphlets? There is at least easier access to other information now if you want it. Clearly a lot of people don't want it and don't want to hear other points of view or information.I've been following this thread and am genuinely wondering to what extent youtube has affected/emboldened these people (Trumpists). With the way its algorithms work, some body could start out searching "Are vaccines really safe?" and in a very short space of time could find themselves having the most out-there Qanon (etc) stuff suggested to them. It monetises people's curiousity/vulnerability/discontent etc, and I wonder how much of the blame lies there, as much as the orange bellend himself. I'm not that clued up the ins and outs of American politics and society to know how much difference it would've made if youtube didn't work that way.
(Go easy - this is my first post.)
The results provide evidence in favor of partisan cueing: When alternative narratives are endorsed by political parties viewed favorably by the respondent, they are more likely to be believed. I suggest that political parties are able to capitalize on misinformation and a lack of trust in official institutions for tactical advantage. Results differ by subgroup: Higher income and urban respondents are swayed more by their own party source than are lower income and rural individuals.
Come with me, if you want to live.
Was awaiting for the usual "I understand your anger", "lets focus on fighting the enemies that have forced us into this situation". didn't come.That's one hell of a political broadcast with a heck of a swipe at all the grifters who facilitated Trump over the last 4 years
I've been following this thread and am genuinely wondering to what extent youtube has affected/emboldened these people (Trumpists). With the way its algorithms work, some body could start out searching "Are vaccines really safe?" and in a very short space of time could find themselves having the most out-there Qanon (etc) stuff suggested to them. It monetises people's curiousity/vulnerability/discontent etc, and I wonder how much of the blame lies there, as much as the orange bellend himself. I'm not that clued up the ins and outs of American politics and society to know how much difference it would've made if youtube didn't work that way.
(Go easy - this is my first post.)
I've been following this thread and am genuinely wondering to what extent youtube has affected/emboldened these people (Trumpists). With the way its algorithms work, some body could start out searching "Are vaccines really safe?" and in a very short space of time could find themselves having the most out-there Qanon (etc) stuff suggested to them. It monetises people's curiousity/vulnerability/discontent etc, and I wonder how much of the blame lies there, as much as the orange bellend himself. I'm not that clued up the ins and outs of American politics and society to know how much difference it would've made if youtube didn't work that way.
(Go easy - this is my first post.)
Yeah yeah. You were just doing research.Massively, I'd say. I only watched one Sidney Powell / Lin Wood speech (admittedly it was for an hour or so) not that long ago and still get presented with similar things.
On the Qanon Annonymous podcast (brilliant and very funny, btw), they often assess the social media (Facebook etc) timelines of people who have gone full Qanon. From the analysis I have heard, their early posts - in the vast majority of times - are very neutral politically. They might have the odd God Bless America, or the occasional comment on something major happening in the news. Then things begin to change - there is often a middle period where they will quote Qanon stuff with things like "Hey, you should read this. Interesting." or, "Guys - check this out - worrying if true!" I.e. not fully committed. Curious, but otherwise still showing pictures of family days out and interior designs in their house, etc. Few months down the line they are literally putting up memes saying that Obama drinks babies' blood and Hillary is a Satanist. Then it's all "The day of reckoning is soon here" "Where we go 1, we go all". I.e Full Qanon. Cue teary facetime rants that they put up on facebook, etc. Full of satanists, shadowy deep states, etc. The Rabit Hole.I've been following this thread and am genuinely wondering to what extent youtube has affected/emboldened these people (Trumpists). With the way its algorithms work, some body could start out searching "Are vaccines really safe?" and in a very short space of time could find themselves having the most out-there Qanon (etc) stuff suggested to them. It monetises people's curiousity/vulnerability/discontent etc, and I wonder how much of the blame lies there, as much as the orange bellend himself. I'm not that clued up the ins and outs of American politics and society to know how much difference it would've made if youtube didn't work that way.
(Go easy - this is my first post.)
It's almost four years old now, but this article about youtube recommendation algorithms has stuck in my head: Force Fed — Real LifeI've been following this thread and am genuinely wondering to what extent youtube has affected/emboldened these people (Trumpists). With the way its algorithms work, some body could start out searching "Are vaccines really safe?" and in a very short space of time could find themselves having the most out-there Qanon (etc) stuff suggested to them. It monetises people's curiousity/vulnerability/discontent etc, and I wonder how much of the blame lies there, as much as the orange bellend himself. I'm not that clued up the ins and outs of American politics and society to know how much difference it would've made if youtube didn't work that way.
One way you can think of it is a 'force multiplier'. This is a military term and it means, like a lever, you can do more with the same number of people and effort. Night vision and GPS, for example.I've been following this thread and am genuinely wondering to what extent youtube has affected/emboldened these people (Trumpists). With the way its algorithms work, some body could start out searching "Are vaccines really safe?" and in a very short space of time could find themselves having the most out-there Qanon (etc) stuff suggested to them. It monetises people's curiousity/vulnerability/discontent etc, and I wonder how much of the blame lies there, as much as the orange bellend himself. I'm not that clued up the ins and outs of American politics and society to know how much difference it would've made if youtube didn't work that way.
(Go easy - this is my first post.)
On the Qanon Annonymous podcast (brilliant and very funny, btw), they often assess the social media (Facebook etc) timelines of people who have gone full Qanon. From the analysis I have heard, their early posts - in the vast majority of times - are very neutral politically. They might have the odd God Bless America, or the occasional comment on something major happening in the news. Then things begin to change - there is often a middle period where they will quote Qanon stuff with things like "Hey, you should read this. Interesting." or, "Guys - check this out - worrying if true!" I.e. not fully committed. Curious, but otherwise still showing pictures of family days out and interior designs in their house, etc. Few months down the line they are literally putting up memes saying that Obama drinks babies' blood and Hillary is a Satanist. Then it's all "The day of reckoning is soon here" "Where we go 1, we go all". I.e Full Qanon. Cue teary facetime rants that they put up on facebook, etc. Full of satanists, shadowy deep states, etc. The Rabit Hole.
I have seen this happen to a very close friend. He was always in the middle politically and honestly was more interested in football, going out, and films than anything else. On his facebook page today he has a meme with a Zombie drugged and laying on the floor with the words above, "The Great Reset is Underway." He now goes on anti mask marches, believes that Bill Gates created the virus. He has lost nearly all his friends. Again, the rabbit hole.
The bit about his dad was powerful, though. That's how you compare Trump to Hitler.
Connecting everyone to everyone is also a fantastic thing, though, with amazing possibilities for exchanging information and ideas. And for getting out subversive messages from places in genuine strife - eg the role of the internet in the Arab Spring.Perhaps it's also just the idea of connecting everyone to everyone else that was a bad idea.
He was always very socially well adjusted - very well liked in a large group of friends. He is a millionaire after having built up a air conditioning business. Hadn't read a book in his life, but was very funny and naturally bright.Does sound very similar to progression into a cult. Which is unfortunate because the main way I've heard of getting someone out of a cult is to show up inconsistencies between what the cult leader says and does, or says on different occasions. Only here there are multiple cult leaders: Trump, Q, lots of randoms ...