Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Urban 75 Informal Anarchist Actions

anarchist horse actions

 
Wow, this one is a classic - loses points for not reading like badly translated poetry, but the emphasis on bus stops makes up for it:


Unsurprisingly we have also had lots of issues with tankie groups. After we posted an action where windows of a bus stop had been smashed we received a fuck tonne of abuse online...

The action we previously mentioned caused quite a split in the left – with some people becoming distraught at the idea of property damage happening to privately owned anti-homeless architecture and others minding their business and not policing others...

It was very clear from the response to the bus stop action that our local scene was not a safe space for us. We’ve accepted this and moved on.

Wherever bus stop windows get smashed, their legacy will live on. ✊
 
Wow, this one is a classic - loses points for not reading like badly translated poetry, but the emphasis on bus stops makes up for it:




Wherever bus stop windows get smashed, their legacy will live on. ✊
Is there any explanation for the action where windows of a bus stop were smashed?

wherever they go next, they’ll continue to be a pain in the ass for the state, capitalism, transphobes and anyone wanting to wait for a bus out of the rain
 
That statement is just fantastic.

"When we quote tweeted that we could beat everyone in LGB Alliance in a fight, Proletarian Memetics Laboratories replied to us “What next for you incel edgelords? Knock down ginger at the local womens institute meeting”."

Shake in your boots the forces of State and Capital, shake like the weak and fearful cowards that you are.
 
Is there any explanation for the action where windows of a bus stop were smashed?

wherever they go next, they’ll continue to be a pain in the ass for the state, capitalism, transphobes and anyone wanting to wait for a bus out of the rain

They mention anti-homeless architecture so I'm guessing the bus stops had replaced sleepable benches with sloped benches/individual seats/handrest split benches/whatever.
Smashing the bus stop windows is not exactly a useful piece of practice that I can see in response to this placement of hostile architecture.
 
They mention anti-homeless architecture so I'm guessing the bus stops had replaced sleepable benches with sloped benches/individual seats/handrest split benches/whatever.
Smashing the bus stop windows is not exactly a useful piece of practice that I can see in response to this placement of hostile architecture.
What response would you suggest? Erection of organic hemp hammocks?
 
We have these things in our local bus stops, they were clearly installed by someone driven by a combination of spite and an irrational fear of the poors moving in and bringing down house values. You certainly can't sleep on them.
Hell you can't even sit on them if you are actually using the bus stop to wait for a bus.
 

Attachments

  • 2018-03-25 15.22.04.jpg
    2018-03-25 15.22.04.jpg
    307.2 KB · Views: 11
Wow, this one is a classic - loses points for not reading like badly translated poetry, but the emphasis on bus stops makes up for it:




Wherever bus stop windows get smashed, their legacy will live on. ✊
The world around us will be dead before we reach our thirties. Revolution will never happen and we will never win.
Sound like a barrel of laughs 😬
 
What response would you suggest? Erection of organic hemp hammocks?

There's plenty of hostile architecture around which is amenable to being de-hostiled in one way or another depending on what equipment you can/will use if you want to take direct action against hostile architecture. Smashing the windows of a bus stop doesn't change anything about the seating in it.

If you want to draw attention to the issue and can't fix the seating, break it rather than the windows so everyone can experience what it's like to not have public architecture that meets your needs. Whatever you do, it's the marketing around the action that does the work more than the action itself.
 
That statement is just fantastic.

"When we quote tweeted that we could beat everyone in LGB Alliance in a fight, Proletarian Memetics Laboratories replied to us “What next for you incel edgelords? Knock down ginger at the local womens institute meeting”."

Shake in your boots the forces of State and Capital, shake like the weak and fearful cowards that you are.
There's only like two people in LGB Alliance anyway, horrible as they are I don't think they're a huge boss battle.
 
There's plenty of hostile architecture around which is amenable to being de-hostiled in one way or another depending on what equipment you can/will use if you want to take direct action against hostile architecture. Smashing the windows of a bus stop doesn't change anything about the seating in it.

If you want to draw attention to the issue and can't fix the seating, break it rather than the windows so everyone can experience what it's like to not have public architecture that meets your needs. Whatever you do, it's the marketing around the action that does the work more than the action itself.
If someone engineers something you can un- engineer it, with some panachè
 
None of u bitchass crackers is gonna do shit. Your all a bunch of pale ass sheep fucking pussy faggots.
Each of your aliases has been shown the door here, but like billy no mates, you keep hanging around, desperately seeking attention.

Have taken the bait and replied to your meanderings, but you have nothing to say.

You're possibly the most boring troll ever. It must get to you, being so utterly useless and uninspired.
 
Back
Top Bottom