Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukip - why are they gaining support?

Ghandi.jpg


:confused:

What a clown you are Pickman's. Do you know nothing of history? The Roma look subcontinental because they are subcontinental. Hence the reluctance of Farage and his ilk to share a street with them.

5601320890_50a58ac244.jpg
 
that's ROMANIANS you thick cunt

No, he's talking about the Roma specifically.

Note what he says in the very piece you cite: “The vast majority of Romanians who have come to the UK wish to better their lives and would make good neighbours."

Politicians throughout Europe use this kind of code.
 
if he meant roma surely he'd have said 'the majority of Roma'

unless its all a sneaky dog whistle code to tie in general anti roma prejudice and conflate that with romanians and eastern europeans in general?
 
No, he's talking about the Roma specifically.

Note what he says in the very piece you cite: “The vast majority of Romanians who have come to the UK wish to better their lives and would make good neighbours."

Politicians throughout Europe use this kind of code.
he says that because he said clearly the other day he wouldn't want a romanian as a neighbour and now he's trying to make out he didn't mean it.
 
No, he's talking about the Roma specifically.

Note what he says in the very piece you cite: “The vast majority of Romanians who have come to the UK wish to better their lives and would make good neighbours."

Politicians throughout Europe use this kind of code.
not to mention certain academics in turkey
 
if he meant roma surely he'd have said 'the majority of Roma'

unless its all a sneaky dog whistle code to tie in general anti roma prejudice and conflate that with romanians and eastern europeans in general?
Yep. That's exactly what he did in the radio interview discussed on the other thread. Segued from Roma into Romanians very deliberately and deftly.
 
If Milliband starts to "triangulate" his stated policies so as to encompass racist supporters of Farage then he will be more of a loser than some of us already thought he was.
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...aying-ukip-is-not-a-racist-party-9396215.html
In that article itself the Independent manages to slip seemlessly from talking about Rumanians to Roma.
He can't help himself.
“The vast majority of Romanians who have come to the UK wish to better their lives and would make good neighbours,” he wrote.

“But there is a real problem, an unpalatable truth that our political class would rather not discuss. Since the welcome fall of Communism and the awful dictator Ceausescu, Romania has struggled to complete a full transition into a western democracy.”

Citing issues of organised crime and the social exclusion of the Roma minority in Eastern Europe, Mr Farage went on to say: “We should not be in a political union with Romania, with an opened door to all of their citizens. We must take back the power to stop criminals from entering our country by taking back control of our borders.
Farage and racism is like Putin and the Ukraine; he's not moving in the tanks but sends them as close to the border as he can. As well as given comfort to agitators from a distance. Dogwhistle brinkmanship?
 
He can't help himself.

Farage and racism is like Putin and the Ukraine; he's not moving in the tanks but sends them as close to the border as he can. As well as given comfort to agitators from a distance. Dogwhistle brinkmanship?

It's cultural. As said, we all know his claims to be separate from the polticial class is spurious given that he quacks, walks, and shits like the proverbial duck.

It's cultural: he's embedded in the machine he claims to stand against and that stand is the thing driving ukip along. Consequently he's a liar.

To people like him it's just the natural order: foreigners, like the indigenous serfs, should keep their place and preferrably, in the case of wogs, stop at Calais.

So he likely doesn't see himself as racist, even though he probably is. I don't ordinarily like that kind of judgement, but the evidence is overwhelming even if anecdotal. It's as natural to discriminate, from the top of the social pile, as it is to want Britain to be self governed.

What's then happened is he's enveigled a bunch of 'hard working' business types to come on board by offering them the ability to denounce and oppose workers rights and those pesky human rights that stop them from sacking pregnant women and paying compensation for mishaps etc.
 
"the media has elevated him....The Mail and The Sun have been actively formenting the discontent he's benefitted from. If an algorithm had to create a political leader based on Sun and Mail articles it would be Nigel Farage." - Musa Okwonga hits the nail on the head. No mystery at all.

 
"the media has elevated him....The Mail and The Sun have been actively formenting the discontent he's benefitted from. If an algorithm had to create a political leader based on Sun and Mail articles it would be Nigel Farage." - Musa Okwonga hits the nail on the head. No mystery at all.



Take comfort from that if you want, but the issue of immigration/identity politics has been the elephant in the room for twenty years. When the BNP was politically killed off it was assumed that the danger had passed.
All that's happened is that UKIP have harnessed the same discontent to more dramatic effect. 5 years ago UKIP were the 'good Nazis' the palatable alternative to the BNP.
Now Farage is getting the same treatment that Griffin got. Hope and Hate meanwhile trawl through twitter and facebook accounts to find the nugget then used to paint the party as a whole party as fascist. Exactly the same formula employed against the BNP.
Perhaps it will work again.
What if it dosen't?
What if it does?
 
its not the same really, ukip has a veneer of respectability that the BNP never managed, even at the height of their star.
 
Because they wear better clothes? You don't get that whole 'scruffy chav'/'fat thug' thing that made it easy for people to look down their noses at the EDL/BNP. This is respectable middle-class bigotry, right?
i was referring to the fact that the british national party (re-)emerged from the national front, a party which never managed to shrug off its virulent hitler-worship.
 
Take comfort from that if you want, but the issue of immigration/identity politics has been the elephant in the room for twenty years. When the BNP was politically killed off it was assumed that the danger had passed.
All that's happened is that UKIP have harnessed the same discontent to more dramatic effect. 5 years ago UKIP were the 'good Nazis' the palatable alternative to the BNP.
Now Farage is getting the same treatment that Griffin got. Hope and Hate meanwhile trawl through twitter and facebook accounts to find the nugget then used to paint the party as a whole party as fascist. Exactly the same formula employed against the BNP.
Perhaps it will work again.
What if it dosen't?
What if it does?

I go along with quite a lot of that post, but certainly not the "elephant in the room" thing. Migration is talked about a great deal. Why do people act as if it isn't?
 
i was referring to the fact that the british national party (re-)emerged from the national front, a party which never managed to shrug off its virulent hitler-worship.

did any significant number of BM end up in the BNP? cos they were a not-even-trying-to-hide-it hitler cult ennit...
 
I get the impression Griffin isn't really trying to be respectable any more, some of the mask has slipped and the islamophobia is laid on pretty strong now. His has his euro-money (which presumably comes with a nice golden parachute) so is probably set up on that alone, no need to bilk party members for a living.
 
if he meant roma surely he'd have said 'the majority of Roma'

unless its all a sneaky dog whistle code to tie in general anti roma prejudice and conflate that with romanians and eastern europeans in general?

It is. Based on the fact that his electorate is defined as those who can't be arsed to distinguish "Romanian" from "Romany".
 
Back
Top Bottom