el-ahrairah
forward communism, forward gerbils!
my cuppa was introduced to my monitor via the medium of hysterical laughter. post of the day so far.
UK courtroom to hear evidence against the official narrative of 9/11
- Thread starter Jazzz
- Start date
my cuppa was introduced to my monitor via the medium of hysterical laughter. post of the day so far.
Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
Horsham Magistrates are going to take about 3 minutes to fine this tool for having no tv licence, then kick him out on his arse.
It could be worth going along to watch, tbf!
existentialist
Tired and unemotional
Somehow I doubt it.
cesare
shady's dreams ♥
They've probably been instructed to arrive for 10am and the case will be heard as soon as possible after then. So they'll be left waiting until 12.55.It's not going to unfold - these vaunted three hours is simply these idiots misreading being told they will be heard in the 10am-1pm session as them being allotted three hours to present their case - rather than them being heard alongside many others in that session. They've even managed to either totally misread or lie about the most basic of intro information
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
I find most of the individual expert testimony plausible. What I don't find plausible is the synthesis of those individual expert testimonies into a coherent narrative, mostly because such narratives pick and choose the testimony that fits the thesis of the narrative best, and take for granted the veracity and validity of that testimony, even if it is unsupported by the rest of the "expert community" for that subject.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Sorry, no public seating in courtroom #3.Dotty's going to be round on the 25th so we could try and head up to Horsham and see what's going on...
or maybe not
(i wonder why?!)
frogwoman
No amount of cajolery...
It's those jews again
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Another example of Jews in law.It's those jews again
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
I think you're assuming that C
ptin Fceplm is posting this stuff in the hope of convincing/converting someone. He isn't. He's posting to boost his sense of self-respect. He's testifying his "truth" so that, like an evangelical Christian, he can feel smug about being better-informed than the atheists and agnostics. 
frogwoman
No amount of cajolery...
Not only are they controlling the TV and making a truth-seeker pay towards his own brainwashing they are now SUPPRESSING THE TRUTH FROM THE PUBLIC
I think you're assuming that C
tbh, i think he's just a) mad, and b) a bit of a cock.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Thank you jazzz for starting this thread and proving the utter lunacy of the cause you espouse. If 11 1/2 years after 911 the best your side can do is an albeit imaginative case for non-payment of tv licence on the grounds the bbc is a terrorist organisation, then the only value left in your cause is comedick value, and the only people attracted by it appear to be such sad-arses and fuckwits even a viz cartoon along the lines of 'june the 9/11 loon' would hesitate at some of the anticks conspiraloons get up to.
8ball
Decolonise colons!
I think the only real explanation left is some kind of organic brain illness.
He gets his ass handed to him and vanishes until the cognitive dissonance dies down, but rather than what happens with a normal mind, he just seems to eventually re-boot and come back with another piece of total crap a while later as if nothing has happened.
He reminds me more of a broken computer than anything else.
rubbershoes
not the only raver in the village
existentialist
Tired and unemotional
I got a mild knucklerapping for doing that, though. Or maybe it was putting theIt's spelled C
into his proper username, I forget now...I think he must have been relentlessly reporting posts where it was happening, because I seem to recall it was quite prevalent at one time.
existentialist
Tired and unemotional
I suspect you'd be in for fairly long periods of boredom with a couple of episodes of hysterical fun, lasting about two and a half minutes.Dotty's going to be round on the 25th so we could try and head up to Horsham and see what's going on...
or maybe not
existentialist
Tired and unemotional
So the most anyone's going to hear about it might be a brief report in the West Sussex County Times (and I don't suppose even they bother reporting TV licence cases, although I suppose it might give them an excuse to report on a "minor fracas" in the magistrates' court, at best.
My money's on a total non-event, with chummy being handed a fine and a brief visit to the cells to reflect on whether his noble cause is worth his rather less noble liberty.
ETA: and a representation to the court from Jazzz, claiming that he can't get a fair trial as the case has been extensively discussed on that there Illumatinet.
So you are demanding I enter discussion with you on a topic, then you are saying you don't want to discuss it? Nice move.
I would say that informationclearinghouse is more reputable than the BBC which I view as a discredited news source. Your opinion may be different. That's fine! I'm just filling you guys in. What you make of things is up to you.
Happy banging!
beesonthewhatnow
going deaf for a living
editor
hiraethified
How you deal with the thorny question of the credibility of the supposed 'peer reviewed' study you cited in your opening post?So you are demanding I enter discussion with you on a topic, then you are saying you don't want to discuss it? Nice move.
I would say that informationclearinghouse has greater 'credibility' than the BBC. Your opinion may be different. That's fine! I'm just filling you guys in. What you make of things is up to you.
Happy banging!
If you are asking, must I get sidetraked by totally irrelevant stuff which was already done to death several years ago, the answer is no.
editor
hiraethified
My question was absolutely central to your opening post.
Well are you happy for a thread on the topic of the nanothermitic residue found in sample of dust from the World Trade Centre? You certainly should be. If you are, then we'll kick it off there.
beesonthewhatnow
going deaf for a living
I don't think it's irellevant at all. You consistantly bring your jewish heritage up when faced with the anti semitic accusations these topics bring, yet not only have always refused to condemn a known holocaust denier, but apparently spent a day with him conducting "research". I'd say this rather undermines your credibility.
equationgirl
Respect my existence or expect my resistance
I said I wasn't discussing it with you. Perhaps THE REALLY REALLY BIG FONT will make it superclear:So you are demanding I enter discussion with you on a topic, then you are saying you don't want to discuss it? Nice move.
I would say that informationclearinghouse is more reputable than the BBC which I view as a discredited news source. Your opinion may be different. That's fine! I'm just filling you guys in. What you make of things is up to you.
Happy banging!
I'M NOT DISCUSSING THIS WITH YOU.
I also think you should check the dictionary definition of 'demand'.
Similar threads
