Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

UK courtroom to hear evidence against the official narrative of 9/11

it was a victory in the sense that he got two dozen sadsacks out to support him, and didn't mention the jews once
DotCommunist,

I hope you aren't insinuating that Rooke holds an entire race of people responsible for 9/11 without any basis whatsoever that he personally thinks that way. I am really disappointed with this continued shameful stuff on urban75. Bandying about accusations of racism where none exists is an insult to any genuine anti-racism campaigner, and many on these boards should know a great deal better :rolleyes:
 
...I am really disappointed with this continued shameful stuff on urban75. Bandying about accusations of racism where none exists is an insult to any genuine anti-racism campaigner, and many on these boards should know a great deal better :rolleyes:
It's not as disappointing as seeing you continue to peddle your various conspiracies that, as has been pointed out to you numerous times, are modelled after and repeat classic anti-Semitic tropes.As well as being utter bollocks.
 
DotCommunist,

I hope you aren't insinuating that Rooke holds an entire race of people responsible for 9/11 without any basis whatsoever that he personally thinks that way. I am really disappointed with this continued shameful stuff on urban75. Bandying about accusations of racism where none exists is an insult to any genuine anti-racism campaigner, and many on these boards should know a great deal better :rolleyes:

Stop hanging out with racists.
 
DotCommunist,

I hope you aren't insinuating that Rooke holds an entire race of people responsible for 9/11 without any basis whatsoever that he personally thinks that way. I am really disappointed with this continued shameful stuff on urban75. Bandying about accusations of racism where none exists is an insult to any genuine anti-racism campaigner, and many on these boards should know a great deal better :rolleyes:


Jazzz


which one of us is mates with Nick Kollestrom?
 
DotCommunist,

I hope you aren't insinuating that Rooke holds an entire race of people responsible for 9/11 without any basis whatsoever that he personally thinks that way. I am really disappointed with this continued shameful stuff on urban75. Bandying about accusations of racism where none exists is an insult to any genuine anti-racism campaigner, and many on these boards should know a great deal better :rolleyes:



why do you think people always accuse you of being an anti-semite jazzz? as it happens i don't think you are. but surely, in the however many years you have been involved with this stuff you must have noticed how much racist shit there is?
 
I believe his line here is "even racists can be right sometimes"
Or, perhaps,"their views on race are not relevant to the Greater Truths, which are of course anything I believe to be true".

It's ends-justifies-the-means thinking for paranoid zealots...which is probably why racism crops up so often in the context of conspiraloonery - they share a lot of thinking errors in common.
 
DotCommunist,

I hope you aren't insinuating that Rooke holds an entire race of people responsible for 9/11 without any basis whatsoever that he personally thinks that way. I am really disappointed with this continued shameful stuff on urban75. Bandying about accusations of racism where none exists is an insult to any genuine anti-racism campaigner, and many on these boards should know a great deal better :rolleyes:

Your ability to ignore points and duck questions that are inconvenient for you is astounding.

I'd love to hear how Rooke's conviction for not having a TV licence can be construed as a victory, but I suppose there's precious little chance of your ever explaining it...
 
Is there anything in that article that supports your claim that this was some kind of victory for this prat?

He seems to be being careful to avoid actually claiming that himself - he's just sticking to the links. I think if he was honest (which he's not, obviously) even he'd admit it's a totally ridiculous claim.
 
DotCommunist,

I hope you aren't insinuating that Rooke holds an entire race of people responsible for 9/11 without any basis whatsoever that he personally thinks that way. I am really disappointed with this continued shameful stuff on urban75. Bandying about accusations of racism where none exists is an insult to any genuine anti-racism campaigner, and many on these boards should know a great deal better :rolleyes:
Well, here is his expert witness Tony Farrell being all pally with anti-semite and holocuast denier Nick Kollerstrom in a film they made together .

Only ever a few steps away.



(ed: I've embedded the video for you but will un-embed if you want)
 
from the comments:

How do the small number of filthy antiGentile/antiSemitic(includingMoslems!)
/antiEveryone , but their hatefilledZionist selves. Get away with it...?
Where are 'our'(?) Politicians, Police , Military officers ??
To understand, watch "HowZionistsDivideAndConquer","JamesWright,
Scottish Rite 'Sentinel' program". Read"TheInternationalJew"4vols
(80articles)editorHenryFord.ref:page68,etc,vol1.Learn the methodology
of recruiting/manipulating men/women, via fraternities(Masons,etc)to be
complicant in subverting their own countries, at the demands of theirZionist
puppet meisters. WatchMikeRavero,DavidIrving andEusticeMullins .
See"AlexJones'CoverUp'~israeliSpyRing inUSA,Australia andCanada"
"BenFreedmans1961speech","RabbisAgainstZionism" and Linked vids.
See w w w. i am the witness. c o m and 'Links'. Britain has been'owned'
by these international schleppers for a long time. Learn the reality of
OUR very dangerous situation.

yeah because that's not anti-semitic at all.
 
What do you think about Rooke attempting to use as an expert witness someone who is more than happy to work with holocaust deniers Jazzz?

Have you now cut all ties with the holocaust denier Nick Kollerstrom after your own previous joint work with him? If so, why? On what grounds? His anti-semitism? If so, then why would you think that it's for ok Farrell to work with him without it undermining his own credibility?

You have cut ties with Kollerstrom right? Haven't you?
 
Farrell can't even pretend that he didn't know about his mates holocaust denials in the way that jazzz did as in the video they produced together they chose to include this (edit: as noted above):

2eydrx1.jpg
 
On Kollestrom nowadays, his main website is

http://www.whatreallyhappened.info

The website is a new form of Holocaust-based anti-semitism positing Finkelstein as a Neutral between Holocaust Orthdoxy and Holocaust Revisionism (denial of murderous intent by the Nazi elite and belief that deaths of Jews were magnified a five hundred fold by a Soviet-Allied post-war conspiracy).
Treating itself as merely a fascinated curious observer.

In its WW2-related history it describes a Soviet interrogation and prison centre for caught Nazis and collaborators - Zgoda labour camp - as a "Jewish concentration camp for Germans".
It features prominent centre-right filth like Peter Hitchens and Pat Buchanan:

Peter Hitchens on WW2 (Daily Mail)

Did Hitler want war? (Pat Buchanan)

Alongside masses of partially posted Bletchley Park intelligence documents.

It is also heavily part of the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust.

http://forum.codoh.info/viewforum.php?f=2

Kollestrom is a semi-prominent guest on conspiracist US radio:

http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.nl/2013/01/academic-witch-hunt-target-nick.html
 
Sorry, butchersapron - trying to be helpful, I embedded that video for you but its such stinking a pile of loonshite I'm thinking you intentionally only posted up a screen grab. Please advise!
 
Back
Top Bottom