He really isn't choosing the best place to do it, then!
I can understand people voting for Trump, after all, people voted for Corbyn.
he pretty much shattered that one into a thousand tiny pieces, waaay backSurely by this point marty1 is breaking the rule of ‘don’t be a dick’?
wtf are you on about? i have done no such thingExactly, thank you for now debunking yourself.
I didn't invite you to post up random links, especially ones from right wing websites or Youtube content thieves. I asked you a fucking question.
Kamala Harris attacks Joe Biden's record on busing and working with segregationists in vicious exchange at Democratic debate
Biden calls Harris' attack "a mischaracterization of my position across the board."www.google.com
I didn't invite you to post up random links, especially ones from right wing websites or Youtube content thieves. I asked you a fucking question.
I didn't invite you to post up random links, especially ones from right wing websites or Youtube content thieves. I asked you a fucking question.
I suggest you re-read your post, you asked for a credible link - I gave you three to choose from.
The first is a c-span video and the other two are related articles.
I provided you what you ‘fucking’ asked for (ffs).
So here's the problem. As far as I'm concerned you post some interesting stuff from the UK, but you repeatedly spam the place with this sort of dumb shit that is C&Ped from US r/w social, for whatever reasons you have, I don't care. Anyone can read this stuff and see precisely where it comes from - I do, lots of other people do too. It's disruptive, it causes fights, it doesn't improve anything. Thread bans are pointless because new threads emerge all the time.
So we're left with either (a) you stop it or (b) you get permabanned. I honestly don't see a way past this.
I'm still listening, I'm sure they'll get to it.Did they think M1 should be banned too?
Those were not - even slightly - 'credible' links. More like provocative, snide trolling. With zero argument from you explaining how they were credible.I suggest you re-read your post, you asked for a credible link - I gave you three to choose from.
The first is a c-span video and the other two are related articles.
well done S-P.
Losing patience with you now. You've been warned about your constant 'hit and run/cut and paste' right wing trolling. I'm thinking that this site really isn't for you as it REALLY doesn't need someone posting up a stream of conservative/republican links without any comment or input.I suggest you re-read your post, you asked for a credible link - I gave you three to choose from.
The first is a c-span video and the other two are related articles.
I provided you what you ‘fucking’ asked for (ffs).
Those were not - even slightly - 'credible' links. More like provocative, snide trolling. With zero argument from you explaining how they were credible.
For instance, look how ridiculously easy it was for me to demolish your prize Exhibit A, concerning the then-VP Biden speaking at the funeral of Robert Byrd.
I note you have put zero counter-argument to that particular post of mine.
Heads of two tech giants - Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook) and Jack Dorsey (Twitter) will now testify over alleged censorship of the Hunter Biden article that appeared in the NY post.
Facebook and Twitter chiefs ordered to testify - BBC News
The social networks have been accused of censoring a news article about Joe Biden's son Hunter.www.google.com