It's not nice to be intolerant of the viscous, after all. Some just have a different pace of thinking.
well I was gonna say unless they mean thick
It's not nice to be intolerant of the viscous, after all. Some just have a different pace of thinking.
Do you think so?isn't calling it out engaging with it?
Ok. Noted.And it's my right to debate and discuss the issues raised by transactivists campaigns, if you don't want to engage with that, fine, but just shouting 'transphobe' and running away is pointless imo.
It's complex because to be 'non-transphobic' the demand appears to be that everyone else meekly accepts that the entire parameters of the debate be set by one side. So if you don't accept that, then by definition you're a transphobe.
Hating, shunning, trying to fuck up transpeople = transphobia for sure. Bullying misgendering, etc etc likewise. I don't do any of those things and I'd happily bet I've had far more interaction with transpeople than most people, they have been in my life since the 1980s; but according to many on this thread, I'm a transphobe. If I am then the term is just a political slur, it's meaningless.
I think we seem to have found our natural rhythm of being arrogant and rude as fuck whilst having a laugh. This might turn out to be The Thread of the Year.Great bantz lads.
I think we seem to have found our natural rhythm of being arrogant and rude as fuck whilst having a laugh. This might turn out to be The Thread of the Year.
I like performative adolescent masculinity especially when it is accompanied by a natal cis vagina, like mine. Now fuck up and listenThere's nothing like a bit of performative adolescent masculinity to establish your credentials for telling feminists to shut up.
i think it may beDo you think so?
I like performative adolescent masculinity especially when it is accompanied by a natal cis vagina, like mine. Now fuck up and listen
It's already doing it. You can't fool everyone the whole of the time
That's meant to be a killer point? On a thread about gender and sex?
Sheesh.
That's meant to be a killer point? On a thread about gender and sex?
Sheesh.
yes, after st george bantz, who was martyred for his faith on this day in 1412YES! KILLER!
I wrote an essay in response to soc fem vs rad fem. Ama return to that after more sleep. This is bantz tuesday.
Eastenders is my alternative to chemical sedation. Use it wisely, but it sure helpsi am going to watch hollyoaks, it's way more inclusive than this thread.
Ok.i think it may be
It's a reaction to you calling people entitled, stereotypical men.
a natal cis vagina
That answer was utterly explicitly to one poster and not to HoratioCuthbert and it's extremely dishonest of you to suggest otherwise..
But no surprise to me
Do you think slightly mistaken might work just as well in that sentence, cope?That answer was utterly explicitly to one poster and not to HoratioCuthbert and it's extremely dishonest of you to suggest otherwise. But no surprise to me.
Also see... for example...
'Top bantz lads'
A key tactic in this debate is to reframe disagreement as hate. What this does is to let the transactivist off the hook when it comes to providing evidence to defend their argument. It's just another way of suffocating debate.
Do you think slightly mistaken might work just as well in that sentence, cope?
I'd accept that you made an honest mistake but when you try and justify it, you're just a liar.
Sick burn yoDouble ouchhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhyyyyyyyyyy!
Not when she tries to prove that she's right, as she just has done. She has form.
i dont think they meant viscous, maybe vicious